-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
SC Trading Thread (Part I)
- Thread starter September 27 2008
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
But I'd say Seaby. I like Kreuzer more, but the fact is, you would be just trading sideways. At least get something out of it. Ottens isn't one you should consider a heap.
Second one
Sorry, but I don't get it...
Anyway...
Just one more opinion. I think I'll definately do this unless there's a glaring hole.
OUT: Ball, Gray
IN: Dangerfield (I have ROK, Pav and Ziebell up forward), Brown
Personally, I wouldn't jump the gun and trade Tippett.
But I'd say Seaby. I like Kreuzer more, but the fact is, you would be just trading sideways. At least get something out of it. Ottens isn't one you should consider a heap.
Second one
Sorry, but I don't get it...
Anyway...
Just one more opinion. I think I'll definately do this unless there's a glaring hole.
OUT: Ball, Gray
IN: Dangerfield (I have ROK, Pav and Ziebell up forward), Brown
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
The reality is you're trading two premiums out for a Premium and a mid pricer. I really think Ball will come good, So will Gray. Brown won't kick a big every week, but i like Dangerfield you might need to squeeze him in somehow.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Thanks Guys!
But you have just presented me with a new dilema lol Seaby or Kruezer? I see the value in Seaby, why is he priced so low? Is he up and coming as well and didn't get his chance at the eagles?
And being a Carlton man is hard to resist not bring in Kreuzer, he plays like a rover more than a ruckman and i tend to think he's always gonna get lots of stats! but yeah agreed with the trading sideways, but he sort of does look like getting consistant scores over 100, will seaby do that too or is it just a purple patch?
Thanks Guys!
But you have just presented me with a new dilema lol Seaby or Kruezer? I see the value in Seaby, why is he priced so low? Is he up and coming as well and didn't get his chance at the eagles?
And being a Carlton man is hard to resist not bring in Kreuzer, he plays like a rover more than a ruckman and i tend to think he's always gonna get lots of stats! but yeah agreed with the trading sideways, but he sort of does look like getting consistant scores over 100, will seaby do that too or is it just a purple patch?
NewmanFoley08
Draftee
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Hey need some opinions on my Tippett woes.
I am tossing up with tactic here on whether to go with a rookie in Carl Peterson & save lots of money or go with a popular pick and improving mid priced player Pat Dangerfield???
Can I please have some opinions.
Thankyou in advance!
Hey need some opinions on my Tippett woes.
I am tossing up with tactic here on whether to go with a rookie in Carl Peterson & save lots of money or go with a popular pick and improving mid priced player Pat Dangerfield???
Can I please have some opinions.
Thankyou in advance!
Millington Magic
Club Legend
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
You're right, I could/should of held back on Harvey. With his price decrease and JB's price increase coming it made it a lot easier of a decision.
You're right, I could/should of held back on Harvey. With his price decrease and JB's price increase coming it made it a lot easier of a decision.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
To be honest I think that's a FAIL
But you never know it could work... all the best..
Not sure if you are joking but basically what you are saying is:
Roo + Kornes is better than
Ablett + Hall + 2 trades
To be honest I think that's a FAIL
But you never know it could work... all the best..
Not sure if you are joking but basically what you are saying is:
Roo + Kornes is better than
Ablett + Hall + 2 trades
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
I think Luke Ball is a hack (traitor is probably the better word, but then again, he knew he wasn't good enough for us) and that Robbie Gray was a mistake.
But you're opinion is probably closer to reality
I think Luke Ball is a hack (traitor is probably the better word, but then again, he knew he wasn't good enough for us) and that Robbie Gray was a mistake.
But you're opinion is probably closer to reality
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Seaby was always 2nd/3rd fiddle to Cox/Gardiner at the Weagles, averaging around 55 since he started in 2004 (hence his low price). Rucks do take time, but I'm not sure anyone (perhaps some Eagles fans) would have expected him to burst out of his shell quite like this now that he's number 1 ruck. I picked White for my 2nd ruck, thinking he'll also go forward and kick some goals. Feeling pretty stoopid now, let me tell you...
Your man Kreuzer is a freak though- he's like Cox a year or two ago -incredible mobility and speed that big blokes often don't have, plus he's bulked up a bit since last year. Top rucks this year will be these two and Sandilands (my no 1).
Can't use a trade this week for either of the other ruckmen yet- bigger fish to fry.
Hurn-> O'Brien/Hunt/Ladson (which one?) Rest of my backs: Goddard, Enright, Hodge, Malceski, Hooker, Maguire (Silvagni, Nason)
Hall-> Brown. other forwards Roo, RoK, Waite, Medhurst, Warren, Walker (Rockliff, Roberts)
I know Hurn will come back fine and will probably still hit the 90's, but I've got to make sacrifices to fix that forward line. This should leave me with a good swag in the kitty for next week to fix my other glaring error mentioned above.
Anyone got any thoughts?
Seaby was always 2nd/3rd fiddle to Cox/Gardiner at the Weagles, averaging around 55 since he started in 2004 (hence his low price). Rucks do take time, but I'm not sure anyone (perhaps some Eagles fans) would have expected him to burst out of his shell quite like this now that he's number 1 ruck. I picked White for my 2nd ruck, thinking he'll also go forward and kick some goals. Feeling pretty stoopid now, let me tell you...
Your man Kreuzer is a freak though- he's like Cox a year or two ago -incredible mobility and speed that big blokes often don't have, plus he's bulked up a bit since last year. Top rucks this year will be these two and Sandilands (my no 1).
Can't use a trade this week for either of the other ruckmen yet- bigger fish to fry.
Hurn-> O'Brien/Hunt/Ladson (which one?) Rest of my backs: Goddard, Enright, Hodge, Malceski, Hooker, Maguire (Silvagni, Nason)
Hall-> Brown. other forwards Roo, RoK, Waite, Medhurst, Warren, Walker (Rockliff, Roberts)
I know Hurn will come back fine and will probably still hit the 90's, but I've got to make sacrifices to fix that forward line. This should leave me with a good swag in the kitty for next week to fix my other glaring error mentioned above.
Anyone got any thoughts?
- Mar 28, 2008
- 3,211
- 520
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Luke Ball > Travis Boak
Luke Ball > Travis Boak
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Go with Seaby.
Seaby is priced so low because he didn't get a chance at the rucks at West Coast. Cox and later in the year Nic nat were golden, there was no room for him. So he dropped in value, and again by moving clubs.
Go with Seaby.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
If it didn't work out...it's material for the worst trade thread!
In terms of expected round 3 values, Roo will +, Kornes will ++, whereas,
Ablett will - unless he pulls a blinder (but I've noticed Ablett is not getting the same kind of protection from his team mates 1 or 2 years ago), and Hall will not change much.
The 2 trades hurt, but my objective is for consistency, which Hall lacks (I don't doubt he will get some big scores, but for forward premiums I prefer HF than FF).
I do not lack cash cows on the bench with barlow/martin/waters/macguire/Hitchcock/Jetta and Gumbleton. Lucky so far no injuries and all rookies are due to play their 3 games.
The real other issue is having to pick up a caption out of RoK/Roo/Cooney every round. But hopefully can grab Gazza back later (waste another 2 trades...)
To be honest I think that's a FAIL
But you never know it could work... all the best..
Not sure if you are joking but basically what you are saying is:
Roo + Kornes is better than
Ablett + Hall + 2 trades
If it didn't work out...it's material for the worst trade thread!
In terms of expected round 3 values, Roo will +, Kornes will ++, whereas,
Ablett will - unless he pulls a blinder (but I've noticed Ablett is not getting the same kind of protection from his team mates 1 or 2 years ago), and Hall will not change much.
The 2 trades hurt, but my objective is for consistency, which Hall lacks (I don't doubt he will get some big scores, but for forward premiums I prefer HF than FF).
I do not lack cash cows on the bench with barlow/martin/waters/macguire/Hitchcock/Jetta and Gumbleton. Lucky so far no injuries and all rookies are due to play their 3 games.
The real other issue is having to pick up a caption out of RoK/Roo/Cooney every round. But hopefully can grab Gazza back later (waste another 2 trades...)
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Well you've done it now, should of posted the question before you did it lol
which is what i have done! for the same trade! and so far i've been told to go seaby instead, and i'm slowly being convinced! However it's not a bad trade, Kreuzer is definately gonna score better than Tippet!
Well you've done it now, should of posted the question before you did it lol
which is what i have done! for the same trade! and so far i've been told to go seaby instead, and i'm slowly being convinced! However it's not a bad trade, Kreuzer is definately gonna score better than Tippet!
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Should rack up the points this week with Shaw out, and let's face it Hunt/Ladson will never be keepers.
Hall>Brown is a good trade, But i'm not sold on Medhurst, If you have enough cash go for Medhurst, as Hall wouldn't have served his purpose.
Go with Hurn>O'brien
Should rack up the points this week with Shaw out, and let's face it Hunt/Ladson will never be keepers.
Hall>Brown is a good trade, But i'm not sold on Medhurst, If you have enough cash go for Medhurst, as Hall wouldn't have served his purpose.
Linear
Team Captain
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
If you have plenty of other cash cows and no immediate injuries hold the course and do not trade if you can help it.
If you have plenty of other cash cows and no immediate injuries hold the course and do not trade if you can help it.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Cheers, Thats the reason i do it, My first choice is normally the best, just wanted to see someone els's opinion.
Cheers, Thats the reason i do it, My first choice is normally the best, just wanted to see someone els's opinion.
Linear
Team Captain
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Thought about this trade but not convinced Boak is a keeper just yet.
Luke Ball > Travis Boak
Thought about this trade but not convinced Boak is a keeper just yet.
Linear
Team Captain
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Kreuzer is not guaranteed to score better than Tippet over 22 rounds.
Kruezer could get injured, Tippett can return to form in a few weeks and post some big scores like last year, anything can happen.
Kreuzer is not guaranteed to score better than Tippet over 22 rounds.
Kruezer could get injured, Tippett can return to form in a few weeks and post some big scores like last year, anything can happen.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Yes, but using the trades is the bad thing...
The value of Ablett may drop and allow others to jump on board and you may feel like you are losing dollars (on a relative basis), however if you keep him you it won't impact you... Ablett is apparently playing bad but he is averaging 126!!
I don't want to give my suggestion nor say too much as you've already traded..but the trades may hurt you near the end.. But all the best man...
Yes, but using the trades is the bad thing...
The value of Ablett may drop and allow others to jump on board and you may feel like you are losing dollars (on a relative basis), however if you keep him you it won't impact you... Ablett is apparently playing bad but he is averaging 126!!
I don't want to give my suggestion nor say too much as you've already traded..but the trades may hurt you near the end.. But all the best man...
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Have done -
Out: Masten, Tippett
In: Jetta, Browndog
Originally wasn't planning to trade at all but the Tippett knee and form and everything else is playing on my mind. I think he's too much of a liability especially with the value he will lose. Have gone with Jetta cos I feel his job security is better than the others i was considering and Browndog for the obvious reasons. Leaves me with 130k as well.
Have done -
Out: Masten, Tippett
In: Jetta, Browndog
Originally wasn't planning to trade at all but the Tippett knee and form and everything else is playing on my mind. I think he's too much of a liability especially with the value he will lose. Have gone with Jetta cos I feel his job security is better than the others i was considering and Browndog for the obvious reasons. Leaves me with 130k as well.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Thought long and hard about this trade i think its a win/win
A. Walker OUT Barlow IN
Hall OUT J. Brown IN
Keeping Medhurst instead of Hall and keeping Ball instead of Walker. I think both will score better and more consistently.
What do you guys think????
Thanks in advance
Thought long and hard about this trade i think its a win/win
A. Walker OUT Barlow IN
Hall OUT J. Brown IN
Keeping Medhurst instead of Hall and keeping Ball instead of Walker. I think both will score better and more consistently.
What do you guys think????
Thanks in advance
- Status