-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
SC Trading Thread (Part I)
- Thread starter September 27 2008
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Absolute Gun
All Australian
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Naitanui or Seaby??
Naitanui or Seaby??
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
lol.
I don't think Ziebell has reached gun status yet. I hope he doesn't hurt me.
Either of the other two may fire. Nonetheless, if they don't step up, one of them will be next.
lol.
I don't think Ziebell has reached gun status yet. I hope he doesn't hurt me.
Either of the other two may fire. Nonetheless, if they don't step up, one of them will be next.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Trading ideas:
Out Jolly, Trengove/Martin
In Barlow, Kruezer/Sandi
Is Barlow a must yet you think?
My ruck needs some serious attention, with Jolly,Warnock, McEvoy and Ja.Trengove doing SFA.
What to do???
Trading ideas:
Out Jolly, Trengove/Martin
In Barlow, Kruezer/Sandi
Is Barlow a must yet you think?
My ruck needs some serious attention, with Jolly,Warnock, McEvoy and Ja.Trengove doing SFA.
What to do???
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
All combinations of your trades are
... Barlow is a must
All combinations of your trades are
... Barlow is a mustRe: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Well Barlow is a must, so if you have to trade Trengove or Martin to get him in, then do it....and trade Trengove.
What do you think about trading Mitch Robinson for Howlett (probably) or Moles. Saves some cash, will make more money and probably get similar scores? In another thread I said I'd persevere with Robinson, but now not so sure.
Well Barlow is a must, so if you have to trade Trengove or Martin to get him in, then do it....and trade Trengove.
What do you think about trading Mitch Robinson for Howlett (probably) or Moles. Saves some cash, will make more money and probably get similar scores? In another thread I said I'd persevere with Robinson, but now not so sure.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
In the end am pretty sold on going Farmer --> Silvagni and then Warren --> Dangerfield.
Am not happy with Warren as my F7 and feel alot more comfortable putting Dangerfield in that role...
Although similar in price (Warren 260k and Danger 320k) i dont think this is much of a sideways trade. Warren is averaging mid 40s versus Dangerfields high 90s...and I think Dangerfields scope for improvemet is far bigger than that of Warrens...Danger looks like playing some seriously good footy this year...
(I think there is far more to gain both score wise and money wise to go warren to danger rather than tippet/hille to kreuzer or seaby or another ruck. hille and tippet are both good footballers...they will come good. seaby who knows could start pumping out the 40s and 50s soon...)
Can i get a consensus that these trades are in fact a good idea?
Thanks
????????????
In the end am pretty sold on going Farmer --> Silvagni and then Warren --> Dangerfield.
Am not happy with Warren as my F7 and feel alot more comfortable putting Dangerfield in that role...
Although similar in price (Warren 260k and Danger 320k) i dont think this is much of a sideways trade. Warren is averaging mid 40s versus Dangerfields high 90s...and I think Dangerfields scope for improvemet is far bigger than that of Warrens...Danger looks like playing some seriously good footy this year...
(I think there is far more to gain both score wise and money wise to go warren to danger rather than tippet/hille to kreuzer or seaby or another ruck. hille and tippet are both good footballers...they will come good. seaby who knows could start pumping out the 40s and 50s soon...)
Can i get a consensus that these trades are in fact a good idea?
Thanks
????????????
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Definately, make both of those trades. I don't think it's a sideways trade.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
J.Hill ...least job security, isnt he just filling in for brad johnson?
edit: why do you have fev sigh*
J.Hill ...least job security, isnt he just filling in for brad johnson?
edit: why do you have fev sigh*
Cruiserweight Champ
ENT Expert
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Need some advice - I really wanna free up some cash this week so im considering downgrading either Hunt > Silvagni or Medhurst > Peterson. My current 7th def is Waters and 7th fwd is Hitchcock, i also only have two starting rookies in mids.
advice appreciated.
Need some advice - I really wanna free up some cash this week so im considering downgrading either Hunt > Silvagni or Medhurst > Peterson. My current 7th def is Waters and 7th fwd is Hitchcock, i also only have two starting rookies in mids.
advice appreciated.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
factoring in job security and the fact that rookie forwards generally have a harder time consistantly scoring par scores, i would go with hunt to silvagni (or Maguire if you dont already have him). Seems fremantle are the cash cow gods...silvagni and barlow from broughton from last year
factoring in job security and the fact that rookie forwards generally have a harder time consistantly scoring par scores, i would go with hunt to silvagni (or Maguire if you dont already have him). Seems fremantle are the cash cow gods...silvagni and barlow from broughton from last year
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Silvagni looks like he'll definately get 22 (you would think). I'd personally look at him before Peterson, simply because I think his job security is better.
My questions:
Recently I have been considering trading out Luke Ball and Paul Medhurst for Jonathon Brown and Daniel Connors.
I'm now starting to think that it's not worth wasting 2 trades on. I'm really confused on this one.
What do people think? An experienced hand will probably help out. I want heaps of opinion on the subject though.
Thanks guys
Silvagni looks like he'll definately get 22 (you would think). I'd personally look at him before Peterson, simply because I think his job security is better.
My questions:
Recently I have been considering trading out Luke Ball and Paul Medhurst for Jonathon Brown and Daniel Connors.
I'm now starting to think that it's not worth wasting 2 trades on. I'm really confused on this one.
What do people think? An experienced hand will probably help out. I want heaps of opinion on the subject though.
Thanks guys
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
your choice..JB's price will no doubt soar.
Luke Ball vs JB = JB
Medhurst vs Connors = Connors more consistent with 2 scores in the 80s
your choice..JB's price will no doubt soar.
Luke Ball vs JB = JB
Medhurst vs Connors = Connors more consistent with 2 scores in the 80s
Cousin Tiger
Cancelled
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
guys, just completed 2 trades for the week, tell me what you think:
Tippett out Murphy in
Hille out Seaby in
keeping in mind that i have the following in my team
peterson, mitch duncan, barlow, dustin martin, ben nason & matt maguire.
Was thinking that once these guys go up in value, and another group of youngsters look to debut, i will downgrade to the new debutants and then upgrade existing mid range players to keepers e.g. cotchin, vince, gram > better players
i play to use a few trades early to set my team up then have a backlog for injuries/reports etc.?
Good or bad
guys, just completed 2 trades for the week, tell me what you think:
Tippett out Murphy in
Hille out Seaby in
keeping in mind that i have the following in my team
peterson, mitch duncan, barlow, dustin martin, ben nason & matt maguire.
Was thinking that once these guys go up in value, and another group of youngsters look to debut, i will downgrade to the new debutants and then upgrade existing mid range players to keepers e.g. cotchin, vince, gram > better players
i play to use a few trades early to set my team up then have a backlog for injuries/reports etc.?
Good or bad
Cruiserweight Champ
ENT Expert
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Jinny and THomas - you both make good points about the better JS of Silvagni compared to Peterson. I was hoping that with Rhan Hooper out for a month that Peterson should play atleast 7 games (probably more) and reach around 250-270k. Then using the cash made to upgrade him to a fallen premium ie Didak.
Food for thought, got a couple of days to stew over it.
Jinny and THomas - you both make good points about the better JS of Silvagni compared to Peterson. I was hoping that with Rhan Hooper out for a month that Peterson should play atleast 7 games (probably more) and reach around 250-270k. Then using the cash made to upgrade him to a fallen premium ie Didak.
Food for thought, got a couple of days to stew over it.
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Hille to seaby a nice trade, Hille just looks to slow atm and he wont be the player he was.
The second, i dont blame you have trading Tippett out, cudve given him a few more weeks though imo... Murphy is a good move barring injury but dangerfield and ballantyne looks the goods too
Hille to seaby a nice trade, Hille just looks to slow atm and he wont be the player he was.
The second, i dont blame you have trading Tippett out, cudve given him a few more weeks though imo... Murphy is a good move barring injury but dangerfield and ballantyne looks the goods too
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Spartans FC
Debutant
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Cheers mate i'll look into them both are looking promising
Cruiserweight Champ
ENT Expert
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
I like this trade - you secure a topline keeper (Brown) and acquire a mature rookie who should play 22 and by his avg so far should reach 400k by the half way point, whereby you could make a relatively easy upgrade to a gun...Medders was always gonna be an upgrade u may aswell do it now while Brown is this cheap.
I like this trade - you secure a topline keeper (Brown) and acquire a mature rookie who should play 22 and by his avg so far should reach 400k by the half way point, whereby you could make a relatively easy upgrade to a gun...Medders was always gonna be an upgrade u may aswell do it now while Brown is this cheap.
Cousin Tiger
Cancelled
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
thanks for the feedback. I've already got dangerfield in my side, and was very much contemplating ballantyne.
I will wait and see price increases and which kids are set to debut, based on that i might do the rookie ramp and make some cash in order to upgrade to a few keepers.
i've got 150k in the bank atm so in a good position i think!
thanks for the feedback. I've already got dangerfield in my side, and was very much contemplating ballantyne.
I will wait and see price increases and which kids are set to debut, based on that i might do the rookie ramp and make some cash in order to upgrade to a few keepers.
i've got 150k in the bank atm so in a good position i think!
- Banned
- #673
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
What do people think about a sideways rookie trade > Nason out for Silvagni?
Nason looks ok but not sure how much of a cash cow he'll be, can see him getting rested in the 2's in not too distant future.. I dont wanna miss out on cashing in Silvagni down the track..
What do people think about a sideways rookie trade > Nason out for Silvagni?
Nason looks ok but not sure how much of a cash cow he'll be, can see him getting rested in the 2's in not too distant future.. I dont wanna miss out on cashing in Silvagni down the track..
Cruiserweight Champ
ENT Expert
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
Waste of a trade imo, Nason is doing ok and will make some decent money, if you really want Silvagni downgrade un underperforming mid pricer like Kennelly.
Waste of a trade imo, Nason is doing ok and will make some decent money, if you really want Silvagni downgrade un underperforming mid pricer like Kennelly.
LiverpoolRed
Club Legend
Re: SC Trading Thread - 2010
I think its a waste of a trade, Nason will play for tigers al season, with our new youth policy. He looks good. It would be a waste of a trade in my opinion. SNOS is not a proven point scorer, he has played in 2 winning teams, and has scored more cos of the weighted point scoring. What if they get smashed in a couple of games? nason has been in loosing teams and still managed a 70 odd.
- Status
