Score review footage.

[mehow2g]

This is something that needs to be questioned, How it is possible that this day and age and the money the AFL has that the AFL comes out with lowest quality footage when it comes to score reviews?

The angles seem to be limited on certain calls, the footage becomes 240p on certain calls, the footage becomes 3fps on certain calls.

My phone camera records slow motion at 60fps in high quality and detail.

It screams corruption imo, there is no excuse for it.

Please explain AFL.

 

[Micksy]

This is something that needs to be questioned, How it is possible that this day and age and the money the AFL has that the AFL comes out with lowest quality footage when it comes to score reviews?

The angles seem to be limited on certain calls, the footage becomes 240p on certain calls, the footage becomes 3fps on certain calls.

My phone camera records slow motion at 60fps in high quality and detail.

It screams corruption imo, there is no excuse for it.

Please explain AFL.

Probably because they'll want an enterprise solution, rather than using off the shelf units.
When I did IT for the government a hard drive that would cost you and I was $200 in the shops, but the suppliers charged $5000. This included 1hr replacement anywhere anytime.