- Aug 2, 2012
- 34,820
- 56,389
- AFL Club
- Geelong
No they don't.He pisses down their back and tells them its raining and they believe it
They just pretend to, and spread the word.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
No they don't.He pisses down their back and tells them its raining and they believe it
You’re not supporting the government. You’ve spent days whinging about everyone who isn’t Morrison.Apolotical in CFA uniform, doesn’t mean we can’t support the Government for doing what is needed
Hasn’t helped, Nowa Nowa evacuated and under threat, imagine how much safer they’d be if the town was able to be protected. Hope those poor protestors haven’t lost their homes. Or are they the rent a crowd who all live in the city?
Was about to say, they’re in a car park.What, even the car park they're standing on?
Send that to Angus Taylor's office. And Clover Moore.All this pollution from the fires must have about exhausted our carry over credits from Kyoto.
It was already backburned before they took the photo.Was about to say, they’re in a car park.
You’re not supporting the government. You’ve spent days whinging about everyone who isn’t Morrison.
So you come online and whinge because you can’t do it in person. Got it.
I didn’t mention greenies...Greenies aren’t a political party, they don’t represent the views of the Greens we kept being told so it’s not really political to abuse them is it!
No I definitely couldn’t go to the nearest TV camera and tell Andrews to get f’ed if I want to keep my job.
He pisses down their back and tells them its raining and they believe it
This is not enormously surprising and also helps put Constance’s words about Morrison’s reception in Cobargo yesterday in a bit more context.Scapegoat identified.
You’re up, Gladys.
Sorry, we couldn’t lay a glove on Andrews... so we’ve got no choice.
What's illegal, dickhead?Actually dickhead it’s illegal...
Pretty sure you’ve misread what people are finding stupid...The journo pile-on is now getting completely ridiculous.
Journos getting into Morrison for a video - which was made almost definitely by his office and would not have had his involvement - discussing the Govt response to the bushfires.
Why?
Because it has an authorisation on it with his name.
Here’s a hint - every bit of political communication, even if it is just conveying information, has to have an authorisation on it. Regardless of whether it comes from the ‘Australian Government’, an office or even the PM himself.
It’s actually against the law for them not to, and can be ordered to be taken down.
That kind of bleating is why the media has a problem. Because they are chasing the complete bullshit rather than the actual issues.
The video ended with “authorised by Scott Morrison, Liberal Party”. That is not the same as a generic government ad. There is a very blatant difference.The journo pile-on is now getting completely ridiculous.
Journos getting into Morrison for a video - which was made almost definitely by his office and would not have had his involvement - discussing the Govt response to the bushfires.
Why?
Because it has an authorisation on it with his name.
Here’s a hint - every bit of political communication, even if it is just conveying information, has to have an authorisation on it. Regardless of whether it comes from the ‘Australian Government’, an office or even the PM himself.
It’s actually against the law for them not to, and can be ordered to be taken down.
That kind of bleating is why the media has a problem. Because they are chasing the complete bullshit rather than the actual issues.
Using uniformed military personnel in political advertisingWhat's illegal, dickhead?
The journo pile-on is now getting completely ridiculous.
Journos getting into Morrison for a video - which was made almost definitely by his office and would not have had his involvement - discussing the Govt response to the bushfires.
Why?
Because it has an authorisation on it with his name.
Here’s a hint - every bit of political communication, even if it is just conveying information, has to have an authorisation on it. Regardless of whether it comes from the ‘Australian Government’, an office or even the PM himself.
It’s actually against the law for them not to, and can be ordered to be taken down.
That kind of bleating is why the media has a problem. Because they are chasing the complete bullshit rather than the actual issues.
Scummo the Spin Merchant just putty in the hands of his Spin Merchants.The journo pile-on is now getting completely ridiculous.
Journos getting into Morrison for a video - which was made almost definitely by his office and would not have had his involvement - discussing the Govt response to the bushfires.
Why?
Because it has an authorisation on it with his name.
Here’s a hint - every bit of political communication, even if it is just conveying information, has to have an authorisation on it. Regardless of whether it comes from the ‘Australian Government’, an office or even the PM himself.
It’s actually against the law for them not to, and can be ordered to be taken down.
That kind of bleating is why the media has a problem. Because they are chasing the complete bullshit rather than the actual issues.
Most of those running defence for Morrison seem to work with the premise that he's f***ing useless in the first place and can't possibly be expected to lead in this situation.Pretty sure you’ve misread what people are finding stupid...
Steve bracks summed it up just above?
Seems nothing is ScoMos fault. He’s not being forced into releasing videos that he doesn’t want to
BoomUsing uniformed military personnel in political advertising
The justification he will use if he actually replies will be amazingBoom
headshot....
The video ended with “authorised by Scott Morrison, Liberal Party”. That is not the same as a generic government ad. There is a very blatant difference.