Gone Critical
Moderator
- Staff
- #126
I think Murphy and Selwood are the obvious comparisons for Pendles. These 3 are at similar stages of their careers and perhaps like the Voss/Buckley/Hird grouping you can make arguments for either 3 being the best of the group. Clearly they are no where hear those 3 in overall standing.
Ablett and Judd are well ahead of Pendles , their best seasons have been ahead of anything Pendles has yet produced and they have done it for far longer. This applies to Swan also who remains ahead of Pendles still
Ablett and Judd have been doing long enough now to enter the arguments with the likes of Hird Buckley Voss etc
Let Pendles sort himself out with his peers before we get too carried away
Out of interest I would rate Selwood 1st of the group with Pendles and Murphy, as they have been for almost their whole career, too hard to split
Ablett and Judd are well ahead of Pendles , their best seasons have been ahead of anything Pendles has yet produced and they have done it for far longer. This applies to Swan also who remains ahead of Pendles still
Ablett and Judd have been doing long enough now to enter the arguments with the likes of Hird Buckley Voss etc
Let Pendles sort himself out with his peers before we get too carried away
Out of interest I would rate Selwood 1st of the group with Pendles and Murphy, as they have been for almost their whole career, too hard to split







