Were you touching yourself when you typed this?Two seasons as captain of the Furies. 0 Team sheet errors.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Were you touching yourself when you typed this?Two seasons as captain of the Furies. 0 Team sheet errors.
Im still gunna punch him in the neck
At least wait until the 3rd quarter, we should have it in the bag by then
The league vetoed it on the basis that it would make both teams worseWhen did you trade in NaturalDisaster ??
The league vetoed it on the basis that it would make both teams worse
Him leaving made you less sympatheticNo team is worse for getting rid of mr 0%
Him leaving made you less sympathetic
Popcorn.gifCome at me.
Yeah, sympathy, empathy - none of the ‘pathys’ really.We have a guy punching his teammates during games
We never really have had much sympathy
Yeah, sympathy, empathy - none of the ‘pathys’ really.
Oh, except for psychopathy I guess.
Yeah, just like that grey area between ‘person of interest’ and ‘suspect’ I’m always having to operate within.I always forget if the judge said im a pyschopath or a sociopath. I also always forget what the difference between the two is, so i suppose it doesnt matter
For the record, the awesome dude who knifed the tyres of the judges jag wasnt me
Him leaving made you less sympathetic
I’d be more concerned about the train we will run on you to be honestBtw, just a random question...
Which car do you drive, and where do the royals park on match day?
I’d be more concerned about the train we will run on you to be honest
you went up north?
how was it.
EFArfctiger74 said:74 said no one was in the carriage during the 9.56am service, and their tryst was over within seconds
.
man that train guard and magistrate are a bunch of campaigners.Not good
http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw...n/news-story/fd137db7d5415931a942794d47f90945
A PASSENGER who was fined $700 after receiving oral sex on a train has defended his actions, asking, “What man would have knocked it back?”
Rfctiger74, 44, said he began speaking to the woman — who had a “mad body” — on the platform, where she told him: “I’m horny, will you f*** me?”
The gun wingman from the Furies, said the woman then started masturbating next to him, and he agreed to have her perform oral sex on him.
“[The woman] was pretty horny and ready to go,” he told Daily Mail Australia. “Toey as.
But their late-morning liaison was captured on the CCTV, and staff were waiting for the pair when the train pulled into Wollongong Railway Station.
Staff reported finding a “large and disgusting” liquid mess on the floor, which they originally thought was urine, but rfctiger74 explained it was Cola that he had used to clean himself up.
“I got a blow job on the train and I was rinsing my c**k off,” he told officers, according to the Illawarra Mercury.
He later informed police he didn’t have to “pay for it”.
He told the Daily Mail he now regrets his actions after receiving a “bollocking” from a magistrate and having the encounter written up in the regional newspaper, and feared his partner may find out.
“As soon as the deed was done I was out of there and off ... I didn’t know they had cameras all throughout the train.”
The woman, who is known to police, confirmed rfctiger74s story.
74 said no one was in the carriage during the 9.56am service, and their tryst was over within minutes.
“How can you be so lucky and unlucky in the one day?” he asked. “You’d think the train guard would’ve said ‘good on ya, mate.’”
He explained that he poured the bottle of Coke over his genitalia for hygiene reasons.
The woman was a little younger than him and “wasn’t a good sort”, he said. It is unclear whether she was penalised over their encounter, which 74 believes is unfair.
“She was the one masturbating,” he said. “If she didn’t offer me nothing I wouldn’t have f***ing done it.”
He pleaded guilty to offensive behaviour and wilful and obscene exposure at Wollongong Local Court on Tuesday and was placed on a good behaviour bond. He said the magistrate “wasn’t happy” with him, which was “understandable”.
74s lawyer described the incident as “opportunistic”, noting that the encounter had only been witnessed by a few people, despite the time of day.
“The facts speak for themselves ... he took the opportunity that presented itself,” the solicitor said.
Magistrate Mark Douglass convicted 74 on both counts, saying such behaviour would not be tolerated.
“There’s a line in relation to decency in our community and you have well and truly crossed it,” he said.
A royal ninja?
A royal ninja?