Moved Thread Senate Inquiry into The Bulldogs Free Kick Differential

[Boristown]

This year they are.

But during Beveridge's tenure, whilst reaming the comp in the free kick differential - they've been top 2 twice in free kicks for.

Lol in 6 years they’ve been top 2 TWICE!

Stop the press

As an aside, have you thought about creating a Cameo profile like Plugger?

 

[Lavender Bushranger]

Lol in 6 years they’ve been top 2 TWICE!

Stop the press

As an aside, have you thought about creating a Cameo profile like Plugger?

Yes that's right.

They've dominated the free kick differential, and contrary to what some posters are saying - it's not just because they don't give away many frees.

As you stated, during this time they've been 1st and 2nd for Most Frees For also. Which puts to bed the myth that this extraordinary statistic is due to them being disciplined.

 

[Mofra]

Most of his frees were due to him being too hard to stop without defenders infringing, he really should have got more frees than he got.

So you're saying... some players get free kicks which is bad (except for Nick) and free kick counts should be even (except for Nick) but if you're first to the ball and a good team you get more free kicks, except if that happens to a team that isn't St Kilda it's bad.

Cool, got it

 

[Boristown]

Someone is going to need to explain to the Senate Inquiry how the Bulldogs managed to lose the free kick count but win the game.

 

[Lavender Bushranger]

Someone is going to need to explain to the Senate Inquiry how the Bulldogs managed to lose the free kick count but win the game.

??

They played better than Port. And they allowed Liberatore to unashamedly throw the ball out of scrimmages.

FWIW on a different note, I don't particularly rate Port.

 

[Boristown]

??

They played better than Port. And they allowed Liberatore to unashamedly throw the ball out of scrimmages.

FWIW on a different note, I don't particularly rate Port.

Of course they did.