Sexual Assault in Football

[Cruyff14]

Right now he would probably take any contract he can get after he is done with United.

Doubt it.

 

[Zidane98]

Yeah dunno how constructive dismissal would go.

If his contract is paid out in full there are no arguments. That means the terms of the contract have been met and then terminated.

 

[SM]

If his contract is paid out in full there are no arguments. That means the terms of the contract have been met and then terminated.

Your suggestion he train on his own unless he agrees to leave is constructive dismissal.

 

[Jatz]

Could they not just pay out the contract and have him leave?

 

[Zidane98]

Your suggestion he train on his own unless he agrees to leave is constructive dismissal.

Valid point. Not sure how much the civil system would entertain his complaints given the circumstances though.

 

[RPCB]

Why would he even come to the A-League lol.

Who said that?

See, I wouldn’t need to ask if you actually quoted people on here.

 

[pantskyle]

Could they not just pay out the contract and have him leave?

Sure they could, how would that look if they paid him off 10 million?

 

[Zidane98]

Sure they could, how would that look if they paid him off 10 million?

To me I can understand it as the club wanting to remove someone who they do not want at United while meeting all legal obligations to do so. End of the day he is going to get paid anyway if he hangs around as expected until the end of his contract.

 

[pantskyle]

To me I can understand it as the club wanting to remove someone who they do not want at United while meeting all legal obligations to do so. End of the day he is going to get paid anyway if he hangs around as expected until the end of his contract.

It's bad PR either way.

 

[Jatz]

Sure they could, how would that look if they paid him off 10 million?

Better than letting him hang around like a bad smell.

I think the average Joe would realise he can't now be sacked but that he shouldn't be near the team.

It's better than letting him stay there in the club shirt for the next two years collecting his payment anyway.

 

[Zidane98]

Better than letting him hang around like a bad smell.

I think the average Joe would realise he can't now be sacked but that he shouldn't be near the team.

It's better than letting him stay there in the club shirt for the next two years collecting his payment anyway.

Yeah, while the PR from paying out his contract is bad, this is much worse. And the end result is the same. This really is a "least worst" type situation where the club can never really come out a winner.

 

[pantskyle]

Better than letting him hang around like a bad smell.

I think the average Joe would realise he can't now be sacked but that he shouldn't be near the team.

It's better than letting him stay there in the club shirt for the next two years collecting his payment anyway.

Might be able to sell him for peanuts and remove him that way. Someone will take on the contract.

 

[Jatz]

Might be able to sell him for peanuts and remove him that way. Someone will take on the contract.

Will they? Who's paying him 75k a week now?

 

[Cruyff14]

Who said that?

See, I wouldn’t need to ask if you actually quoted people on here.

The board's biggest advocate of the A-League.

 

[Frank Bunn]

Greenwood has been included in United's updated PL squad via the U21s. But he remains suspended from training and matches until their review is finished.

Mason Greenwood included in Man United's latest Premier League squad list

Mason Greenwood has not played for Man United since he featured against West Ham on January 22 last year.

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

 

[pantskyle]

Will they? Who's paying him 75k a week now?

I don't know Jatz, maybe he'd get less from a new club over a longer period.

 

[Punchy Bassett]

Does anyone really think the Glazers will stump up the cash to pay him out? They'll leave this burning pile of s**t on the door step of any potential new owners.

Personally, he shouldn't play for us again.

 

[Zidane98]

Does anyone really think the Glazers will stump up the cash to pay him out? They'll leave this burning pile of s**t on the door step of any potential new owners.

Personally, he shouldn't play for us again.

If they look at it in terms of the negative publicity costing the club more than 10 million then sure I expect them to have no qualms doing it.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

 

[JacobTaranto]

Greenwood has been included in United's updated PL squad via the U21s. But he remains suspended from training and matches until their review is finished.

Mason Greenwood included in Man United's latest Premier League squad list

Mason Greenwood has not played for Man United since he featured against West Ham on January 22 last year.

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

United have a fairly dope front line if Mr mason greenwood is re included ...

 

[jd2010]

Bissouma early in the season as well. Surely Partey is the outlier and gets what the crimes deserve for a change

 

[jd2010]

I do feel the clubs of players found not guilty are a little hamstrung in what they can or should do next. Right thing to do is stand them down until they're found guilty or not by the courts. But legally it's tough after that. PR wise just call it a mutual termination, sure it means they got paid to get out but it's over and done with in one go

 

[RPCB]

Tbf, the only reason that tweet belongs on this thread is because it mentions Mason Greenwood’s name. Otherwise, the “off topic” thread is more suitable for discussing Nick Kyrgios and Zverev’s cases.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

Does anyone really think the Glazers will stump up the cash to pay him out? They'll leave this burning pile of s**t on the door step of any potential new owners.

Personally, he shouldn't play for us again.

You sir are a wonderful wordsmith.
Paint a lovely picture.

 

[Frank Bunn]

These cases don't appear to be related?