Share/Investment Tips

[Nandrolone Stam]

A general question,

What are the rules regarding offering share/investment tips? e.g. "Buy stock X because blah blah"

As far as I know, this is an area that would need to be considered carefully, as ASIC loves jumping on people for providing fraudlent advice.

I do know that if someone was to post such advice on here they would probably have to state they are not a licensed securities dealer/financial adviser, so they should seek professional advice etc.

 

[HoldMyBeer]

S2 Resources----I'll not elaborate as those who are looking for things on a plate shouldn't be parting with their hard earned on a tip ever. They're not true speculators nor are they the type of investors the company, or any company for that matter wants on their register.

DYOR

This isn't financial advice and I'm not a financial advisor.

G'day bedford....

 

[HoldMyBeer]

S2 Resources----I'll not elaborate as those who are looking for things on a plate shouldn't be parting with their hard earned on a tip ever. They're not true speculators nor are they the type of investors the company, or any company for that matter wants on their register.

DYOR

This isn't financial advice and I'm not a financial advisor.

Not bad, up 100%

MI6 next but it’s for the very patient.

This isn't financial advice and I'm not a financial advisor.

Over and out, the interest factor here isn't there

 

[Bowski]

Not bad, up 100%

MI6 next but it’s for the very patient.

This isn't financial advice and I'm not a financial advisor.

Over and out, the interest factor here isn't there

Will read deeper into it and track out of curiosity.

"A bigfooty tip" would be a great answer to "how did you get your beach house?"

Certainly has potential after some light reading but so do most things.

 

[HoldMyBeer]

Will read deeper into it and track out of curiosity.

"A bigfooty tip" would be a great answer to "how did you get your beach house?"

Certainly has potential after some light reading but so do most things.

MI6 up more than 100% from when posted...

 

[Bowski]

MI6 up more than 100% from when posted...

I wet my beak with a tiny slice after a weekend of reading, so far so good.

 

[footy75]

AI companies.

 

[Kram]

Not bad, up 100%

MI6 next but it’s for the very patient.

This isn't financial advice and I'm not a financial advisor.

Over and out, the interest factor here isn't there

I got them from ltr.

Haven't even looked at them for ages, may as well now that they are worth something again.

 

[RandB]

MI6 FXG WA8 looking good.

So many small caps in precious & critical minerals having a run atm.

Held POD but sold out because I'm an impatient idiot.

 

[HoldMyBeer]

MI6 FXG WA8 looking good.

So many small caps in precious & critical minerals having a run atm.

Held POD but sold out because I'm an impatient idiot.

You don't need to qualify what type of idiot you think you are by using the word 'impatient' ---- I've got a list I use on myself You're welcome to lease a couple off me.

You're playing against a stacked deck, it's a tough game, the guys with the money that can move the share price as they please will take your money. They can set up charts in many mining stocks however they like with indicators that will trigger buys or sells for whatever suits them at the time. Then there's the instos.

Good luck

 

[Kram]

Understand basic capital structure and how to read a financial report is a start.

Big one is knowing if the management is any good, which I have family in the sector that often know them.

 

[sabre_ac]

Big one is knowing if the management is any good, which I have family in the sector that often know them.

Naturally, I don't have the information to back this up, but I'm going to repeat it anyway .

I am reasonably confident that I read somewhere that there is very little evidence to suggest that management teams have subsequent success after their first achievement. The concept of following certain rock star management teams to their new project as an investing strategy isn't backed by outcomes.

That said, you can certainly very quickly spot inexperienced management teams in the C-suite. I'd be looking a minimum for either the CEO, CFO or COO to have prior experience achieving a stated outcome. That or I'd want to see a stacked board, I suspect a lot of Boards are way more involved than shareholders are made aware of.

 

[Kram]

Yeah sure past success isn't a guarantee for it in the future but ni whoever is running a company is absolutely vital and makes a massive difference. Seen it time and time again. Doesn't matter if it's some tinpot drilling mob or big industrial.

 

[HoldMyBeer]

Naturally, I don't have the information to back this up, but I'm going to repeat it anyway .

I am reasonably confident that I read somewhere that there is very little evidence to suggest that management teams have subsequent success after their first achievement. The concept of following certain rock star management teams to their new project as an investing strategy isn't backed by outcomes.

That said, you can certainly very quickly spot inexperienced management teams in the C-suite. I'd be looking a minimum for either the CEO, CFO or COO to have prior experience achieving a stated outcome. That or I'd want to see a stacked board, I suspect a lot of Boards are way more involved than shareholders are made aware of.

Here's a snippet from Mark Bennett back in November 2021 which might be useful for you. He's talking about greenfields exploration which requires a different team to brownfields where a resource is already in place, and an even different team is required for mine builders. Mining companies change their teams as they progress during their life cycle from pegging ground as they move towards production.

Mark Bennett: "Our aim is to find mineral deposits and if appropriate, and it’s not always appropriate, you know, what we do most of our time is just exploration which is a low impact activity and it only rarely leads to the discovery of a viable mineral deposit. And you can, sort of, use statistics in all sorts of different ways, but if you, for example, say that only one in 10 prospects, or sorry, only one in 10 targets becomes an actual prospect, only one in 10 prospects become a mineral deposit and only one in 10 mineral deposits become a significant mine, that’s one in a thousand chance of exploration leading to a mining operation. Now if you were just to halve that then it’s still a one in 125 chance. Using the Minerals Council of Australia’s statistics it’s one in 660, so nearly always exploration fails but it’s undertaken in the hope…“

------then the power went out on his presentation

 

[sabre_ac]

Here's a snippet from Mark Bennett back in November 2021 which might be useful for you. He's talking about greenfields exploration which requires a different team to brownfields where a resource is already in place, and an even different team is required for mine builders. Mining companies change their teams as they progress during their life cycle from pegging ground as they move towards production.

Mark Bennett: "Our aim is to find mineral deposits and if appropriate, and it’s not always appropriate, you know, what we do most of our time is just exploration which is a low impact activity and it only rarely leads to the discovery of a viable mineral deposit. And you can, sort of, use statistics in all sorts of different ways, but if you, for example, say that only one in 10 prospects, or sorry, only one in 10 targets becomes an actual prospect, only one in 10 prospects become a mineral deposit and only one in 10 mineral deposits become a significant mine, that’s one in a thousand chance of exploration leading to a mining operation. Now if you were just to halve that then it’s still a one in 125 chance. Using the Minerals Council of Australia’s statistics it’s one in 660, so nearly always exploration fails but it’s undertaken in the hope…“

------then the power went out on his presentation

100% believe that you need different teams depending on the stage.

Greenfields you want your CEO to be a GEO, a deep ability to explain the potential.
Brownfields/Development you want your CEO to be from a financing or investing background, the geology is pretty much set, you need someone to sell the cost to build compared to return.
Producer you want your CEO to have an extensive experience in operating a mine, someone who can make incremental improvements to key metrics to produce predictable output.

 

[juss]

AI companies.

Is there a good ETF with AI focussed companies in it?
That'd probably be the next place I parked some funds for growth over the next 5-10 years.

 

[HoldMyBeer]

Markets are trading a broad debasement in fiat against Gold.

Gold and Gold miners will play a crucial role in the future expansion of the global monetary base.... that's not a bad addition to it's 5,000 year history as a store of value. Gold stackers are going to have their day in the sun, not without volatility mind you, but the upside of being a part of the global currency is huge.

And it's long term... look at what the CB's have been doing and that's only the start.

 

[Yellow Feathers]

Aussies sure love their mining companies and banks, don't they?
I feel insane around my friends being the only one focussed entirely on US tech.

 

[Kram]

I'm heavily tilted towards miners but big 4 banks are average long term investments and very expensive atm, only financial I have is a big holding in MQG.

I'll likely own one again one day but only at the right price.

 

[HoldMyBeer]

Struck GOLD !!!!! ---- 14 cents when I first posted about it

That's 2 from 2 ----- I might buy a gold plated ute

Hi bedford