Why do you think that is?
Why do you think that is?
I am made deeply uncomfortable by the fact that increasingly the norm is disparate from my own views and thinking. To be unable to relate on this fundamental level to fellow human beings would be deeply uncomfortable for anyone.Why do you think that is?
In what sense? And what exactly is your point, that politics are inherent to footy? Does this mean gambling is 'inherent to footy'?Okay if you want politics out of footy, how about we remove gambling?
Righto, no Australian anthem at the footy at all then. My dual citizenship says that is not about sport.No,. Thats just called pandering. And we need to be stronger and better than that. it ABSOLUTELY can just be for what it is , sport. Leave the rest to imbeciles arguing and virtue signaling on soical media. Where the rest of of us can ignore all the constant look at me virtue bullshit.
support thatRighto, no Australian anthem at the footy at all then. My dual citizenship says that is not about sport.
Playing the national anthem of a country at a sporting event in that country is not political.Righto, no Australian anthem at the footy at all then. My dual citizenship says that is not about sport.
Doesn’t individual choice override thoughI am made deeply uncomfortable by the fact that increasingly the norm is disparate from my own views and thinking. To be unable to relate on this fundamental level to fellow human beings would be deeply uncomfortable for anyone.
I cannot fathom how, in Britain, the death of a felon who overdosed on deadly drugs and dies in police custody after failing to comply with simple requests can trigger mass rioting and protests on account of his race. I do understand there is an issue with the rate at which African Americans are incarcerated, however I cannot understand what that has to do with Britain. I cannot understand how British athletes can kneel in support of an organisation which advocate for the destruction of fundamental values and tarnish British history and heroes (i.e. by tearing down statues of Winston Churchill). I cannot understand that the kneel for an issue in another country but ignore much, much larger issues such as world hunger, poverty, war, dictatorships and even a genocide in China.
It made me uncomfortable when the AFL players did it too, because I don't understand why they choose that issue above all else, and because I know some players wouldn't want to but were effectively forced.
But that has little to do with my comfort, does it?Doesn’t individual choice override though
If you believe we are a free country, if a player has earned the right to take the field, don’t they have the right to take a knee? It doesn’t interfere with the game. It represents their own view. You don’t have to agree with it.
You have the right to feel uncomfortable buddy. I don’t love it personally. But my lack of love is outweighed by the player’s right to express their viewBut that has little to do with my comfort, does it?
My point is that if you want to remove something that you deem detrimental to the sport, then we should remove gambling as well.In what sense? And what exactly is your point, that politics are inherent to footy? Does this mean gambling is 'inherent to footy'?
But gambling is not detrimental to sport. In fact it funds a lot of itMy point is that if you want to remove something that you deem detrimental to the sport, then we should remove gambling as well.
It'd be great if the advertising was regulated, especially during games. It's out of control.My point is that if you want to remove something that you deem detrimental to the sport, then we should remove gambling as well.
It has created a generation of gambling addicts. But politics won't do that.But gambling is not detrimental to sport. In fact it funds a lot of it
You said it was detrimental to sport. That is factually incorrect.It has created a generation of gambling addicts. But politics won't do that.
This is accurate. An ordinary act to one person may be considered a politically-motivated act to another. And in sports, simple sporting competitions can take on whole new levels of political importance when you have country vs. country, or events that are billed as such.Politics is life, life is politics, you can’t separate it from anything.
Anzac Day is not political.When people say they want politics out of sport, they simply mean politics they don’t like. If I may make a generalisation, a majority of people opposed to players taking a knee would lose their sh*t if the AFL was told to drop Anzac Day. There would be cries of censorship, cancel culture etc. But the very nature of Anzac Day and how it relates to our history is political.
Politics is life, life is politics, you can’t separate it from anything.
Of course it is political and has nothing to do with sport.Playing the national anthem of a country at a sporting event in that country is not political.
Let's not draw silly comparisons.
Big difference between Anzac Day commerating people who died for our freedom, and a bunch of virtue signalling tossers.When people say they want politics out of sport, they simply mean politics they don’t like. If I may make a generalisation, a majority of people opposed to players taking a knee would lose their sh*t if the AFL was told to drop Anzac Day. There would be cries of censorship, cancel culture etc. But the very nature of Anzac Day and how it relates to our history is political.
Politics is life, life is politics, you can’t separate it from anything.
You need to read up on WWI history, we were fighting in Turkey under control of the Brits to gain land for the Russian. It had nothing to do with our freedom, we could have sat on our hands during that war and Australia would have been unchanged. As Chuck D said, Don't Believe the Hype.Big difference between Anzac Day commerating people who died for our freedom, and a bunch of virtue signalling tossers.
Yeah,nah.
People of colour are currently fighting a war against injustice. They are fighting so that future generations are no longer unfairly treated or even killed, based on the colour of their skin. They are fighting for freedom, exactly what the ANZACS were supposedly doing, except now the enemy is within their own countries.Anzac Day is not political.
If you think it is, you need to spend some time with some of our returned soldiers, listen to their experiences and understand the impact it has had on them and their families.
Last week I spent 3 days trying to get government help for an ex-soldier whose job it was to recover, put together and identify body parts of people killed in Timor by Indonesia. The impact on him, his children and his wife would bring the manliest bloke to tears. Yet we do very little for these people who give everything up.
Politicians choose what wars we fight - argue with them the politics. Anzac Day is about honouring our soldiers, some of whom are the reason you and I can even have this debate on a message board.
Equating it with this kneeling nonsense isn’t just wrong, it’s disrespectful.
Fighting by kneeling versus getting shot and killed for your countryPeople of colour are currently fighting a war against injustice. They are fighting so that future generations are no longer unfairly treated or even killed, based on the colour of their skin. They are fighting for freedom, exactly what the ANZACS were supposedly doing, except now the enemy is within their own countries.
But Anzac Day is not just about WW1.You need to read up on WWI history, we were fighting in Turkey under control of the Brits to gain land for the Russian. It had nothing to do with our freedom, we could have sat on our hands during that war and Australia would have been unchanged. As Chuck D said, Don't Believe the Hype.
The kneeling is a message of support and unity for the POCs who are getting shot and killed for simply being a different race. Doesn't take a genius to understand the correlation.Fighting by kneeling versus getting shot and killed for your country
I cannot compute how someone would equate the two