Society/Culture Should cannabis be legalised?

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hard_to_Beat

Brownlow Medallist
Suspended
Aug 9, 2012
11,162
6,004
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Hasn't stopped him so far.

This is recreational use, not medicinal use.

It is a popular vote issue, not an issue of medical interpretation.

Obama has won the vote in Colorado by 50% to 47%. Colorado is a swing state.
 

Upton Sinclair

Norm Smith Medallist
Suspended
Jul 31, 2011
5,441
2,033
AFL Club
Collingwood
What's the difference between medicinal and recreational when both have been brought in due to the popular vote? It's still illegal federally.
It will completely changed the dynamics of the Fed's case in overriding state rights, I would imagine.
 

Malifice

Moderator
Oct 2, 2007
33,803
28,288
Perth
AFL Club
Carlton
Obama has won the vote in Colorado by 50% to 47%. Colorado is a swing state.
Which is why there was deafening silence on the issue this year from the Democrats.

They didnt want to upset liberals (who tend to support legalisation) in such an important swing state during an election year.

Now the election is dusted, theyll stomp all over this.
 

CLUBMEDhurst

Norm Smith Medallist
Sep 23, 2008
7,241
4,830
Under the moonlight, the serious moonlight
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Man City
Which is why there was deafening silence on the issue this year from the Democrats.

They didnt want to upset liberals (who tend to support legalisation) in such an important swing state during an election year.

Now the election is dusted, theyll stomp all over this.
I'd be inclined to put money on this prediction
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Play by Numbers

Norm Smith Medallist
Oct 16, 2007
7,589
3,478
All up in Jock's icecream
AFL Club
West Coast
Should we be surprised?

https://news.vice.com/article/leading-anti-marijuana-academics-are-paid-by-painkiller-drug-companies?utm_source=vicenewsfb

Leading Anti-Marijuana Academics Are Paid By Painkiller Drug Companies

As Americans continue to embrace pot—as medicine and for recreational use—opponents are turning to a set of academic researchers to claim that policymakers should avoid relaxing restrictions around marijuana. It's too dangerous, risky, and untested, they say. Just as drug company-funded research has become incredibly controversial in recent years, forcing major medical schools and journals to institute strict disclosure requirements, could there be a conflict of interest issue in the pot debate?

VICE has found that many of the researchers who have advocated against legalizing pot have also been on the payroll of leading pharmaceutical firms with products that could be easily replaced by using marijuana. When these individuals have been quoted in the media, their drug-industry ties have not been revealed.
https://news.vice.com/article/leading-anti-marijuana-academics-are-paid-by-painkiller-drug-companies?utm_source=vicenewsfb
 

Mitchell Madness

Brownlow Medallist
Apr 17, 2006
19,567
7,586
???
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Miami Dolphins(NFL)

mottrain

Premiership Player
Suspended
Apr 21, 2014
3,826
1,667
AFL Club
Geelong
There's also the issue that the pro campaigners like to overstate its effects or those pushing for legalisation are doing so simply because they want to get high every night.
 

Tayl0r

Moderator
Jul 16, 2009
36,977
37,191
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
If you are surprised that opposition to marijuana groups are being funded by those who stand to lose the most from it then you best not look any deeper into the funding for the rest of the politicians.
 
Top Bottom