Society/Culture Should Murdoch's Newscorp newspapers be called an unreliable news source like the Daily Mail.

Socrates2

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Posts
3,433
Likes
4,183
AFL Club
Richmond
Thread starter #1
Just saw a new global scientific study, that shows alarming and potentially catastrophic consequences , hardly given a mention in the Murdoch papers.Front page has 4 articles on Labor,one on the Greens and it's mostly a fear campaign in border security.The Daily Mail was recentlty taken off the reliable news source list by wikipedia. Is it time for the rest of the science denying papers to be added to the list? Four out if five climate change articles in The Australian recomnend no reduction in carbon emmissions.The Herald Sun is similar.Should we cop this from our newspapers and what can be done about it?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

jason pm

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Posts
14,079
Likes
25,384
Location
Walking distance
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Fortitude Valley Diehards. Chelsea.
#2
Most if not all MSM is a load of pretentious horseshit, clickbait sensationalist headline grabbing tripe, all while feigning non-partisanship with no agenda.

Doom and gloom, freaks, celebrities and finance is their go to.
 

Scotland

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 5, 2006
Posts
46,472
Likes
47,689
AFL Club
West Coast
#7
Interesting topic in general because people are always complaining about media biases. Left wing this, right wing that, such and such is a mouthpiece for this party or that party.

Not nearly enough is said about the dreadful quality of journalism we have to endure these days. Give me a slanted piece that is well researched and well written over the clickbait nonsense that passes for news any day.
 

Socrates2

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Posts
3,433
Likes
4,183
AFL Club
Richmond
Thread starter #9

TimmeT

Club Legend
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Posts
2,717
Likes
3,169
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
#10
Just saw a new global scientific study, that shows alarming and potentially catastrophic consequences , hardly given a mention in the Murdoch papers.Front page has 4 articles on Labor,one on the Greens and it's mostly a fear campaign in border security.The Daily Mail was recentlty taken off the reliable news source list by wikipedia. Is it time for the rest of the science denying papers to be added to the list? Four out if five climate change articles in The Australian recomnend no reduction in carbon emmissions.The Herald Sun is similar.Should we cop this from our newspapers and what can be done about it?
This is incredibly ironic.
 

_Swoon

Premium Platinum
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Posts
3,657
Likes
5,476
Location
live at the Greek
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Dallas Cowboys
#11
The HUN is a tabloid, not a proper newspaper. The Australian and WSJ are perfectly fine as news sources so long as people acknowledge they often have an angle. Ideally, people would read multiple papers from different sources and different angles to form their own opinions with points from each side, but these days it seems people don't like encountering things they disagree with.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Twoslabs

All Australian
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Posts
642
Likes
899
Location
Pakenham, (Land of Plenty)
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Chelsea, Glasgow Celtic
#13
What about the publications with much larger viewership eg Herald Sun and The Australian?
News.com.au 1,074,615 page likes
Australian 831,285 likes
Herald Sun 359,336 likes

Everything on the Oz and Hun is normally paywalled where as news still has many of the same stories without a paywall
 

TimmeT

Club Legend
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Posts
2,717
Likes
3,169
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
#14
The HUN is a tabloid, not a proper newspaper. The Australian and WSJ are perfectly fine as news sources so long as people acknowledge they often have an angle. Ideally, people would read multiple papers from different sources and different angles to form their own opinions with points from each side, but these days it seems people don't like encountering things they disagree with.
I am certain the OP will whip you gfor that little comment about the australian although it is absolutely correct. He thinks it is a false source.
 

Socrates2

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Posts
3,433
Likes
4,183
AFL Club
Richmond
Thread starter #17
The HUN is a tabloid, not a proper newspaper. The Australian and WSJ are perfectly fine as news sources so long as people acknowledge they often have an angle. Ideally, people would read multiple papers from different sources and different angles to form their own opinions with points from each side, but these days it seems people don't like encountering things they disagree with.
It's not a different angle ,it's deliberate misleading stories.The Australian has few truthful climate change article, in fact 80% of their climate chang articles say there is no need for carbon reductions. That's called fake news not different angle.
 

_Swoon

Premium Platinum
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Posts
3,657
Likes
5,476
Location
live at the Greek
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Dallas Cowboys
#19
It's not a different angle ,it's deliberate misleading stories.The Australian has few truthful climate change article, in fact 80% of their climate chang articles say there is no need for carbon reductions. That's called fake news not different angle.
Can I ask where you're getting your information that 80% of The Australian's climate change stories are fake news?
 

Socrates2

Premiership Player
Suspended
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Posts
3,433
Likes
4,183
AFL Club
Richmond
Thread starter #22

Snake_Baker

L'enfant terrible
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Posts
37,228
Likes
64,908
Location
inside your head
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Milf Smashers
#23
Just saw a new global scientific study, that shows alarming and potentially catastrophic consequences , hardly given a mention in the Murdoch papers.Front page has 4 articles on Labor,one on the Greens and it's mostly a fear campaign in border security.The Daily Mail was recentlty taken off the reliable news source list by wikipedia. Is it time for the rest of the science denying papers to be added to the list? Four out if five climate change articles in The Australian recomnend no reduction in carbon emmissions.The Herald Sun is similar.Should we cop this from our newspapers and what can be done about it?
Of course they're unreliable.

They also spawned PC group think.
 
Top Bottom