- Thread starter
- #51
Aren't we trying to avoid polluting the Torrens?
There is enough slim in it already!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aren't we trying to avoid polluting the Torrens?
Of course not. There is absolutely no way to do it without coming across as tools.[/QUOTE/]
the problem is that banning him from a presser doesn't stop him writing, strategic leaking to fairfax will get the attention of his editor
Does Rooch wish he was Caroline Wilson?
Tweeted to them to put Merve's phone call on Soundcloud. Everyone on twitter should. I missed the call but heard the aftermath.Can someone tell me about the Rooch getting baked in Fiveaa
Anyone know the Rooch's latest Big Footy Name....I remember Big Hawk being a decoy years back...does he still post anti crows BS here?If you really want to sabotage Rucci's career the Crows should leak info to other journalists. That would make him a fool like how a lot of Victorian journo's break stories about the Crows like the Sando sacking.
Yep, Tosser.Anyone know the Rooch's latest Big Footy Name....I remember Big Hawk being a decoy years back...does he still post anti crows BS here?
A bunch of facts presented with join the dots skills of a crayin weilding toddler who doesn't know numbers does is not "substantive truth" Just Sayin.
If you really want to sabotage Rucci's career the Crows should leak info to other journalists. That would make him a fool like how a lot of Victorian journo's break stories about the Crows like the Sando sacking.
The Torrens? I was thinking more Pine gapUse him for post-match entertainment. Catapult him into the Torrens in front of 50,000 people.
I don't get it.
You guys complain that the guys on 5AA are cheerleaders who won't ask any difficult questions, that the "ambassadors" are in the club's pocket, and yet you want to stack press conferences with yes men?
Which it is? Can't have it both ways
We want journalists to ask the tough questions. Not leading questions, where the answers get twisted to suit a personal agenda.I don't get it.
You guys complain that the guys on 5AA are cheerleaders who won't ask any difficult questions, that the "ambassadors" are in the club's pocket, and yet you want to stack press conferences with yes men?
Which it is? Can't have it both ways
We want journalists to ask the tough questions. Not leading questions, where the answers get twisted to suit a personal agenda.
No. Not at all. People who will ask tough questions then report on them in a fair and balanced manner.in other words yes men like you.
You want them to ask the hard questions, probe, investigate, get to the bottom of things and then agree with you.
Just accept the hypocrisy and move on
I miss my weekly emails from the rooch when I was moderator complaining about bigfooty. The best complaint was the mistruths on a forum. At least some on here are amateurs at mistruths, as opposed to him being a professional at distorting the facts...
in other words yes men like you.
You want them to ask the hard questions, probe, investigate, get to the bottom of things and then agree with you.
Just accept the hypocrisy and move on