Im curious Have we lost every game when Ken is in the vicinity?
And won the games when he is not around.
And won the games when he is not around.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Carlton v Geelong - Rd 12 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 69% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 12 Games
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 12
SuperCoach Rd 12 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - 2026 Fight MND Comp ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 12 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Your lack of comprehension skills are absolutely astounding. I’m genuinely impressed with how confidently you misunderstand things.I’m not a boomer champ, why are you following a sporting organisation hoping they lose. Losers attitude
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
We were the better team for all but a patch of 5 minutes?
Huh?
They smashed us in territory
We were lucky to even come close. We were efficient early , yes. The better side , no.
I dont understand how you cant see it. Blinded by bias.Explain that, logically. Perception is not fact.
It was a 1 point margin.
Thats not a second string Crows side you troll.
They're nearly full strength. Keane for Borlase is a nothing change when Borlase is allowed to scrag just as much as Keane does.
Its just Dawson and Fogarty that's missing.
****ing second string side? Thats more like what we're rolling with injury.
Spot on Sweet had every right to do that if we were down by 5 points, absolute brain fade under pressure AGAINOf all the things to do as ruckman when you're a kick up and a minute to go, hitting the ball into space would be ranked #998 out of #1000. Its literally what the Crows would've been trying to do.
Surely they had a conversation as a group beforehand to plan what to do?
One of the stupidest things I've seen in some time given the context of the game.
It’s actually like the first showdown last year but in reverse, Rozee and Boak spraying their kicks for the match winner and wasting the inside 59s racked up
Actually amazing how we continually lose these games. Like with luck and variance you would think we would win at least one
We just kept kicking it down the line.Crows did there homework, werent going to allow easy centre corridor movement.
Crows don't have much talent but what they do seem to get right is being competitive all game and having more composure than us in these games. We are mentally piss weak and have been forever.It’s actually like the first showdown last year but in reverse, Rozee and Boak spraying their kicks for the match winner and wasting the inside 59s racked up
Actually amazing how we continually lose these games. Like with luck and variance you would think we would win at least one
So obviously with your logic you’re miserable as **** when we winYour lack of comprehension skills are absolutely astounding. I’m genuinely impressed with how confidently you misunderstand things.
I’d tell you to read through my posts again, but I don’t think that’s the issue here.
I dont understand how you cant see it. Blinded by bias.
They had +21 inside 50s. The Crows are not a high I50 team. We are. Our transition from D50 to F50 and our ability to stop the oppo was apparently why we have lifted the last few weeks.
Instead, they controlled territory all night. They stopped our ball movement, forced us into old school hinkleyball. Panicked bombs and hack kicks, and plenty of long down the line which they just cut off and rebounded at will. They turned the game into the scrap, broke even against our midfield in the clearances despite a sizeable advantage we had in hit outs. Really had we not been the benficiary of a handful of really poor umpiring calls and had they not missed or fumbled so many opportunities they would've won by much more.
This is fact, not perception.
The coaches will go away from that and be happy we stuck in the fight but they'll know the Crows played that game on their terms.
They never do, Nicks has been playing the same song for years and we fall for it over and over again.Crows did there homework, werent going to allow easy centre corridor movement.
He should have retired after his 2-3 nasty head knocks. At this point he's just adding to the risk of a pretty bleak life after footy.Marshall is a very odd one
Not a defenders arse
Does nothing when he goes forward
What’s the point if he’s getting 0 possessions in a half
If Marshall isn't playing forward i only see him in a Westhoff type role, he's no defender.Didn’t miss him last week



It actually wasn't that bad until somewhere before half time they start kicking to the contest on the wings instead of finding targets. I expected the coaches would talk to them and they would be back to strategic kicking when they restarted, but it just continued after that, except perhaps for a bit near the end.One thing I noticed is I thought our ball movement was far more stagnant than against Hawthorn and Geelong. Less use of the corridor and less risk taking.
We could learn from that.Did he tho? Tackled a lot..
Agree . One thing Chad and Ken are right on as opposed to Carr.If Marshall isn't playing forward i only see him in a Westhoff type role, he's no defender.
Spot on Sweet had every right to do that if we were down by 5 points, absolute brain fade under pressure AGAIN
I don't necessarily blame just Sweet eitherSweet made a mistake at the end but overall I'm happy with what he is bringing the last few weeks. He has a real physical presence. Playing some good football under Josh.
