Competitions Six Players Goalkicking Competition Rounds 18 (CAR) -23 (FRE)

[Section 5]

Poster	Your Six Players Listed in Order	R 18	R 19	R 20	R 21	R 22	R 23		Total
rye	(18) Morris (19) Lohmann (20) Cameron (21) Hipwood (22) Ah Chee (23) Lohmann
M Malice	(R18) Hipwood, (R19) Bailey, (R20) Morris, (R21) Cameron, (R22) Lohmann, (R23) Hipwood.
Dalions	(18) Cameron, (19) Hipwood, (20) Bailey, (21) Morris, (22) Rayner, (23) Lohmann
Maboo	(R18) Morris (19) Rayner (20) Hipwood (21) Cameron (22) Bailey (23) Ah Chee
Section 5	(R18) Cameron (19) Morris (20) Hipwood (21) Bailey (22) Ah-Chee (23) Cameron
MSB ROYS	(R18) Morris (19) Bailey (20) Cameron (21) Lohman (22) Hipwood (23) Morris
irel	(R18) Cameron (19) Morris (20) Bailey (21) Lohman (22) Hipwood (23) Cameron
Voss the boss	(18) Bailey (19) Morris (20) Lohmann (21) Cameron (22) Hipwood (23) Ah Chee
Crusha	(18) Morris (19) Bailey (20) Hipwood (21) Rayner (22) Cameron (23) Morris
Nuggo	(18) Bailey (19) Morris (20) Ah Chee (21) Cameron (22) Hipwood (23) Lohmann
scoman	(18) Hipwood (19) Cameron (20) Morris (21) Lohman (22) Rayner (23) Bailey
uzabuz	(18) Morris (19) Cameron (20) Bailey (21) Ah chee (22) Hipwood (23) Lohmann
Viceregal	(18) Rayner (19) Bailey (20) Cameron (21) Lohman (22) Morris (23) Hipwood
Comeback Lions	(18) Rayner (19) Morris (20) Ah Chee (21) Hipwood (22) Bailey (23) Lohmann
Jivlain	(18) Morris (19) Bailey (20) Hipwood (21) Cameron (22) Lohmann (23) Morris
Gadzorks	(18) Cameron (19) cam raynor (20) hipwood (21) morris (22) lohman (23)Bailey
25
30

Round #	Players Goals & Behinds Scored	Players Behinds Only
18 CAR
19 WBD
20 GCS
21 COL
22 SYD
23 FRE

PREVIOUS WINNERS: MSB ROYS

 

[Section 5]

We have two players (bolded) this round that goals will be counted for.

For round 10
3 added Hipwood, Ah Chee, Cameron, Lohmann & Bailey
2 added Morris
1 added Rayner

 

[Section 5]

After week one there were 7 equal leaders.

End of week 2 just the one leader in Dalions with 7.4.

Gardiner kicks 4.0 but no one has him in their 7 players

 

[Section 5]

Dalions has had two perfect scores (seeing no one has Gardiner in their 7) and this week Bailey comes on board.
Also not having Cameron has paid off well

Hopefully Bailey has a great game without scoring ha ha.

Cameron: 5 of us started with you only for more getable shots missed than actually goals scored.
Get your act together man, some of us need you to lift big time.
Not to mention the team really needs you to at least convert 60% of your shots on goal

 

[Viceregal]

Cameron: 5 of us started with you only for more getable shots missed than actually goals scored.
Get your act together man, some of us need you to lift big time.
Not to mention the team really needs you to at least convert 60% of your shots on goal

About Charlie...

 

[Dalions]

About Charlie...

Glad for Charlie.
Atleast Bailes got 1 for me.

 

[Section 5]

New outright leader MSB ROYS with 12.6

The highest for the round was Crusha with 8.2

 

[Viceregal]

Methinks I read the instructions incorrectly...

When I saw:
R09 NTH: Hipwood
R10 MEL: Hipwood + Cameron
R11 HAW: Hipwood + Cameron + Morris

I didn't read it as Hipwood score in 9 plus Cameron score in 10 plus Morris score in 11 ... I read it as what Hipwood scored in 9 plus what Hipwood and Cameron scored in 10 plus what Hipwood and Cameron and Morris scored in 11.

Ah well the die is cast

 

[Section 5]

Methinks I read the instructions incorrectly...

When I saw:
R09 NTH: Hipwood
R10 MEL: Hipwood + Cameron
R11 HAW: Hipwood + Cameron + Morris

I didn't read it as Hipwood score in 9 plus Cameron score in 10 plus Morris score in 11 ... I read it as what Hipwood scored in 9 plus what Hipwood and Cameron scored in 10 plus what Hipwood and Cameron and Morris scored in 11.

Ah well the die is cast

The bolded in your post is correct, so you interoperated the rules correctly, but of course you chose a different player order

You chose (09) Cameron (10) Bailey (11) Hipwood

R09 Nth: Cameron = 1 goal 2 behinds or (1.2)
R10 MEL: Cameron (0.2) + Bailey (1.0) = (1.2)
R11 HAW: Cameron (3.0) + Bailey (1.0) + Hipwood (0.0) = (4.0)
Total 6.4
...........................

The best order you could have had for those 3 players would have been: Hipwood, Bailey, Cameron.
That would have given you a total of 9.4.

 

[Section 5]

Players added to various teams this week

Ah-Chee: 5
Morris: 4
Lohmann: 3
Hipwood: 3
Bailey: 2
Rayner:1

 

[Section 5]

I think we all expected more goals scored v a depleted Essendon last night.
However, that did not eventuate. At least we won again.

Lohmann kicked his first goal this season and finished with 3.0.
Those that had him earlier finally got a result.
The beneficiaries were the three that added him this week.
Unfortunately for the rest of us, last week's leader was one of the three.

Round 12 highest scores were Nuggo and rye with 7.3

Overall leader is still MSB ROYS who added Lohmann this week and is 18.6

Second on 16 plus behinds are uzabuz Dalions and rye

 

[Section 5]

Players added to various teams this week

Morris: 5
Cameron: 4
Ah-Chee: 4
Bailey: 2
Rayner 2
Lohmann: 1

 

[Section 5]

Looking at my players the only way i can make up ground on the leaders is for Rayner to kick a bag or at least 1 ha ha.
Leaders being on 16+ MSB ROYS Dalions rye uzabuz

That would also apply to other teams with Rayner too.
Unfortunately, Rayner kicking a bag might not help me catching some other teams in front of me.

 

[Section 5]

Unfortunately, Adelaide got the better of us by 5 points and we sucked at kicking any goals in the last quarter.

Most this week was Hanley with 6.4 closely followed by M Malice with 6.2

Leader still MSB ROYS on 22.8 next uzabuz 20.12 rye 20.11 Dalions 20.9

Three on 19+ myself Nuggo Hanley

 

[Section 5]

My hopes were on Rayner kicking a bag Friday to make up ground on the leaders.
He scored 2 but it could have been more.
He did the team thing with that gift handball to Charlie. Rayner missed a few also like other teammates.
An almost big game from Rayner

 

[Viceregal]

Checks table ... woohoo I am winning (the reverse ladder)

 

[Section 5]

Checks table ... woohoo I am winning (the reverse ladder)

Maybe i could change the rules.
Although Gadzorks would give you a run for your money

 

[Viceregal]

Maybe i could change the rules.
Although Gadzorks would give you a run for your money

Nah if we had known there was an awesome prize for the spoon someone would have picked Andrews, Lester, Answerth, Payne, Dev, and Fort ()

 

[Section 5]

We head to the last round with MSB ROYS still leading with 28.14

That total is 2 goals clear of myself rye Hanley Dalions Nuggo uzabuz

Only rye and Hanley can make up ground out of the above 6 to overtake MSB ROYS
The other 4 have the same 7 players as the leader so can't win.

rye: Needs McInerney to kick 2 goals and for Rayner not to score anything. Thats assuming Big O plays

Hanley: Needs Levi Ashcroft to also kick 2 goals and Lohmann not to score at all

MSB ROYS: Leading by 2 so is best placed to hang on for a win
Just one goal from both Rayner and Lohmann and that will ensure a win.
Also, if Big O misses and Levi also misses playing the Cats that wins it also.

Seven posters have a different player for this last round. I initially thought it would be less than that.
The 2 i mentioned above and Crusha with Berry (24.19), Gadzorks (20.15), scoman with McCluggage (24.17), leaper with Fletcher (24.17), Comeback Lions (22.17)
So, if Berry/McCluggage/Fletcher kick 4 or 5 goals and Lohmann & Rayner go scoreless that may get one of those 3 the win. Very unlikely i would think, but as teams way out of the 8 say each year it is mathematically possible from here.

 

[Section 5]

When i made up the comp i did realize a lot of teams would have the same 6 players in the 2nd last round and just about all would have the same 7 players in the last round.
However, i wanted to see how it unfolded.
The comp was a little different and i did not want it to be too complicated for that first time
Now posters have seen how it works i will make a few slight changes for those last 2 rounds.

I am not sure how much interest this has generated but i will run another after the bye
Starting either R17 or 18. I don’t want to clash with the first week of the Knockout Goal Kicking Competition.
I assume another is starting up soon.

 

[Jivlain]

When i made up the comp i did realize a lot of teams would have the same 6 players in the 2nd last round and just about all would have the same 7 players in the last round.
However, i wanted to see how it unfolded.
The comp was a little different and i did not want it to be too complicated for that first time
Now posters have seen how it works i will make a few slight changes for those last 2 rounds.

I am not sure how much interest this has generated but i will run another after the bye
Starting either R17 or 18. I don’t want to clash with the first week of the Knockout Goal Kicking Competition.
I assume another is starting up soon.

Yeah, I'll restart after the bye.

 

[Hanley]

Thanks Section 5 ! I'll be backing Levi to the hilt this weekend to turn it around and kick two more goals than Kai. Will happily play again post bye

 

[Section 5]

Yeah, I'll restart after the bye.

Okay that's good. I can start again round 18.

 

[Gadzorks]

I'm dead last again.

Picking the opposite of winning is as hard as picking winning.

I'm claiming I'm in the joint lead.

 

[Section 5]

I'm dead last again.

Picking the opposite of winning is as hard as picking winning.

I'm claiming I'm in the joint lead.

That "pick 1" prize position is not yours yet.
You are only 1 behind in front of Viceregal for the spoon, if that makes sense.
Depends which player scores the least out of (Lohmann Viceregal) or (Levi Ashcroft yourself)
This is a battle worth losing.
Maybe i could change the rules so that last position gets an extra pick from a list of defenders next comp.
Just kidding, i think.

 

[Gadzorks]

That "pick 1" prize position is not yours yet.
You are only 1 behind in front of Viceregal for the spoon, if that makes sense.
Depends which player scores the least out of (Lohmann Viceregal) or (Levi Ashcroft yourself)
This is a battle worth losing.
Maybe i could change the rules so that last position gets an extra pick from a list of defenders next comp.
Just kidding, i think.

Game on Viceregal!!! I reckon I've got you covered cause lohman it's building confidence and due for a three goal haul against Geelong

Whereas the young bull Levi is exhausted from his debut season. Poor thing. And while he will be valient and worthy of our deepest respect he just won't have the leg to finish his sole oppotunity from 50 and will shank the ball into the post.

And I'll lose ...... cue evil laughter.

It might be late and i might need sleep but right now this makes sense in my head. Which admittedly is a low bar.