Uhuh-be careful what you wish for Marty. They might start havering a longer look at sloaney.
Sloane hit on Dangerfield
- Thread starter Marcus DuQuesne
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Uhuh-be careful what you wish for Marty. They might start havering a longer look at sloaney.
They could but danger Selwood and Selwood would be in serious trouble
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Nope if the umps get better-Selwood and paddy don't get soft frees. Am more than happy for that outcome. Sloaney's consequences, on the other hand, would be greater than that.
Marty-you are in the GF -let go the bitter stuff and enjoy yourself. You have a very good team with an excellent chance. Have fun.
Chocoholic
Senior List
- Nov 24, 2016
- 261
- 190
- AFL Club
- Geelong
It was done at half time so the 20mins expired before the 3rd quarter.
dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
So they sent him back out before doing it originally?
Danger cited for charging Rory Sloane.
Chocoholic
Senior List
- Nov 24, 2016
- 261
- 190
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Sigh.
No, it happened in the last minute of the 2nd quarter. He came off for the concussion test plas 20 minutes and returned for the 3rd quarter. How hard is that to understand.
dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
I'm confused as to when it was found that he was concussed then. The original Geelong poster said the hit concussed him.
- Jun 23, 2013
- 10,737
- 12,861
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Los Angeles Clippers
0. But if they fine him cotchy is gone
- Jul 20, 2002
- 18,184
- 10,243
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Blyth Spartans, Dallas Cowboys
Ling couldn't get on Sloane's side quick enough. When Roberton took a high contact from Westhoff two years ago he sped out to Roberton with obscene haste and interviewed him in a distressed state to show that he had been concussed and pretty much gave Westhoff no chance of getting off. And the recent decision on Jonas was laughable. A bad record can extend one game to two but even by the MRP's blinkered standards he could have only gone for a fine up to 1 game for a bad record. There can be no doubt that the commentators and the MRP have their favorites.
- Jul 13, 2015
- 36,490
- 40,670
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I think its good to have a discussion. The issue is that a couple of idiots/troublemakers are posting garbage.
MRP made the right decision here.
Danger hams it up?? Seriously if he had gone for the 20mins which your erstwhile fellow posters are suggesting then Sloane is gone. But they are mates and he wouldn't want that so he refused the initial test.
So crows very lucky he isn't Dane Rampe.
Go Cats!!!!!
Mate give it up. He acts and exaggerates, everyone can see it (except maybe Geelong supporters)
Plus I don't think it is the players choice as to if they have a concussion test, unless Geelong have terrible doctors.
Darkyprotector
Premiership Player
- Apr 10, 2017
- 4,871
- 2,379
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
do you know what Justice means
MRP sure dont
Sloane forearm to the head 2 down to 1
ellis a fine
cothin 1 week down to fine becomes 1 week
crow , cloke, rocca all say hello
all missed grand finals for LESS
FACT
Darkyprotector
Premiership Player
- Apr 10, 2017
- 4,871
- 2,379
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
How dare Danger headbut sloanes forearm
No duty of care
Everybody should just move on - it's all done and dusted and we all know that the MRP has and always will be inconsistent, ie Barry Hall being allowed to play in the 2005 GF. It's been going on for years!
- Banned
- #120
Cloke clotheslined someone in the head and from memory Rocca kneeed someone in the head. You're not even in ball the park.
He throws our players under the bus too, which is actually pretty bad considering his connections to Geelong.
You really nailed that one.
