Conspiracy Theory 'snopes' & 'metabunk' discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

cannot

cannot

Norm Smith Medallist
Nov 30, 2016
5,054
4,967
^^ ""Flat World Champions".
AFL Club
Richmond
metabunk:






snopes:

Snopes Co-Founder Embezzles $98,000, Drops Weight, Leaves Fat Wife And Marries Actual Whore

n't it interesting how a little money can change a person? According to divorce papers, Snopes co-founder David Mikkelson started taking all sorts of trips around the world to bang whores after that sweet liberal shill money started rolling in. While engaging in this debauchery, Mikkelson wrote off just about everything as a business expense, embezzling a reported $98,000. The Snopes co-founder has since settled down and married a [NSFW] part time pr0n actress, Snopes.com administrator (spicy!), and sex worker. As in, she has a website devoted to being a whore. Apparently she's a pretty good one despite being "past her time as an adult model." In the same divorce papers, David Mikkelson fires back, claiming his hog of an ex-wife took millions from their joint account and bought property in Las Vegas. No word on who got their obese cat, or if it's still alive.

The Daily Mail reports:

"...a DailyMail.com investigation reveals that Snopes.com's founders, former husband and wife David and Barbara Mikkelson, are embroiled in a lengthy and bitter legal dispute in the wake of their divorce.

He has since remarried, to a former escort and pr0n actress who is one of the site's staff members.

They are accusing each other of financial impropriety, with Barbara claiming her ex-husband is guilty of 'embezzlement' and suggesting he is attempting a 'boondoggle' to change tax arrangements, while David claims she took millions from their joint accounts and bought property in Las Vegas.

She claimed he spent nearly $10,000 on a 24-day 'personal vacation' in India this year and expensed his girlfriend's plane ticket to Buenos Aires." -Daily Mail

As one of the five fact-checkers selected by Facebook to determine FAKE NEWS, and one of the most widely referenced "debunking" websites, is even a tiny moral compass too much to expect? We already know that Snopes staff are militantly liberal fact checkers who love insulting conservatives. Proven liberal bias aside, can we trust an organization co-founded by an embezzling, whore mongering, possibly cat abandoning shill? Plus, he's a ******* moron because he fell for the oldest whore trick in the book.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-weight-leaves-fat-wife-and-marries-actual-wh
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Haven't been on Snopes for a while - Just checked ' Is Barack Obama's birth certificate a forgery?' They say False.

Not so sure about that after checking out Sherrif Joe's investigation ..
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Sir James Sober said:
Haven't been on Snopes for a while - Just checked ' Is Barack Obama's birth certificate a forgery?' They say False.

Not so sure about that after checking out Sherrif Joe's investigation ..
Click to expand...

the lass is just finishing up an adult entertainment video, then she will right fake or false on that one
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Duritz said:
Someone who laughs about a child rape case would have no problems murdering children in the basement of a pizza shop.
Click to expand...
herculez09 said:
Someone who laughs about a child rape case would have no problems murdering children in the basement of a pizza shop, and would therefore have no problems with starting WW3
Click to expand...
So I guess anyone who enjoys South Park is capable of starting World War 3?

FWIW I checked the audio and I don't see the big deal to be honest, she's laughing at the legal system. Not a good look in any case, but it's no better or worse than Trump saying it's ok to grab women by the pussy.

Maybe Snopes is left-leaning- I don't use the website personally- but it's still more reliable than some random guy on YouTube, which is just about the only source most Conspiracy Theorists have...
 
Toump Ass said:
So I guess anyone who enjoys South Park is capable of starting World War 3?

FWIW I checked the audio and I don't see the big deal to be honest, she's laughing at the legal system. Not a good look in any case, but it's no better or worse than Trump saying it's ok to grab women by the pussy.

Maybe Snopes is left-leaning- I don't use the website personally- but it's still more reliable than some random guy on YouTube, which is just about the only source most Conspiracy Theorists have...
Click to expand...
The point is that Snopes called it a lie or whatever when it was clearly true. I'm not debating whether it was a good or bad look.
 
herculez09 said:
The point is that Snopes called it a lie or whatever when it was clearly true. I'm not debating whether it was a good or bad look.
Click to expand...
While Snopes did indeed change the goalposts a little, that blog is also playing semantics. It takes a literal interpretation of the initial claim when it is clear to anyone that the claim 'Hillary Clinton successfully defended an accused child rapist and later laughed about the case' is meant to infer that she is a bad person for laughing about the case, the result and the victim. Laughing about the nature of polygraphs means it may indeed be correct that she 'laughed about the case' but that's only relevant if you believe that laughing about the nature of polygraphs etc is a bad thing.
 
JackOutback said:
While Snopes did indeed change the goalposts a little, that blog is also playing semantics. It takes a literal interpretation of the initial claim when it is clear to anyone that the claim 'Hillary Clinton successfully defended an accused child rapist and later laughed about the case' is meant to infer that she is a bad person for laughing about the case, the result and the victim. Laughing about the nature of polygraphs means it may indeed be correct that she 'laughed about the case' but that's only relevant if you believe that laughing about the nature of polygraphs etc is a bad thing.
Click to expand...
I think that laughing about the nature of polygraphs is a bad thing. I find it pretty hard to laugh about polygraphs being so unreliable that a guilty pedophile walked free.
 
Duritz said:
Someone who laughs about a child rape case would have no problems murdering children in the basement of a pizza shop.
Click to expand...
Would like to see proof of this. Could you respond with a link to the story where someone laughs about child rape? Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top