Entertainment & Music Song contest part 4, host: Ulahoopski, theme: virgin redux, noms due by Thurs 10:00pm AEST

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Plugger35

The umpires are always right!
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Posts
92,108
Likes
89,852
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Chelsea, Black Caps, Subiaco
My song is a virgin but is also a bit of a whore.

Not quite sure how that can be possible but maybe she could just be a whore in terms of giving lots of blowjobs or handjobs and still remain a virgin.
 

Barney_stinson

All Australian
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Posts
636
Likes
608
Location
Townsville
AFL Club
Adelaide
Some seriously shit song posted this round. Virgin or not, they were ****en terrible.

I'd rather post a gun song that historically people enjoy listening to and enjoy than some ****en virgin shit no one gives a poo about to please the music snobs who insist on a clean skiing song to listen to.

Shit song is shit
 

MEB_

Mumma Mebbie
Joined
Feb 6, 2013
Posts
45,542
Likes
72,598
Location
Locker #5
AFL Club
Carlton
Moderator #1,911
My song is a virgin but is also a bit of a whore.

Not quite sure how that can be possible but maybe she could just be a whore in terms of giving lots of blowjobs or handjobs and still remain a virgin.
One of those chicks who will go up the butt to retain her virginity.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Back One Out

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 2, 2015
Posts
11,683
Likes
19,171
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
GAGF
You want spam? Click below and watch whatever you want.

www.youtube.com
People still had to nom a song for this round

There are 14 or 15 songs that I never would've listened to were it not for the process and this round's 'no theme'.

Despite the complaints, I've enjoyed listening to this batch of tunes. Probably the best playlist we've had since the 'Black performers' round. Even the modern-day rehash/ripoff punk tunes (which I normally despise) all had good riffs & great sections. I don't know why anyone was expecting to be blown away by our selections - we're still the same bunch of twats with questionable taste & limited knowledge. Not like we had Henry Wagons or Jarvis Cocker picking the songs for this round.

You said that picking a song to fit the theme is "part of the challenge", but what's so challenging about using Google, or scrolling through your music folder using a search filter ? (fun thing to do, but there'll be further opportunities to do that in the next few rounds)

Some people say they give votes according to the theme, but that's bullshit. e.g. Iron Maiden's 'Number Of the Beast' won the Talking Blues round. It has a 20 second bible reading from a Vincent Price imposter - the intro is superfluous to the song itself. It was probably the only song from that round which didn't really fit the theme. All the other noms had spoken word sections in the song, or spoken-singing, which was the host's intention. ('Rime of the Ancient Mariner' would've been a better fit from the Iron Maiden catalog.)

People don't vote for songs which best fit the theme - they vote for the songs they like best. The theme just gives us a chance to pick on 1 or 2 songs each round and argue over whether they should've been allowed. So for this round, we don't have those arguments. No great loss.
 
Last edited:

Ulahoopski

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Posts
6,609
Likes
7,643
Location
Sunshine Coast
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Raiders NFL, Mudlarks, GC Royals
People still had to nom a song for this round

There are 14 or 15 songs that I never would've listened to were it not for the process and this round's 'no theme'.

Despite the whinging, I've enjoyed listening to this batch of tunes. Probably the best playlist we've had since the 'Black performers' round. Even the modern-day rehash/ripoff punk tunes (which I normally despise) all had good riffs & great sections.

You said that picking a song to fit the theme is "part of the challenge", but what's so challenging about using Google, or scrolling through your music folder using a search filter ?

Some people say they give votes according to the theme, but that's bullshit. e.g. Iron Maiden's 'Number Of the Beast' won the Talking Blues round. It has a 20 second bible reading from a Vincent Price imposter - the intro is superfluous to the song itself. It was probably the only song from that round which didn't really fit the theme. All the other noms had spoken word sections in the song, or spoken-singing, which was the host's intention. ('Rime of the Ancient mariner' would've been a better fit from the iron Maiden catalog.)

People don't vote for songs which best fit the theme - they vote for the songs they like best. The theme just gives us a chance to pick on 1 or 2 songs each round and argue over whether they should've been allowed. So for this round, we don't have those arguments. No great loss.
I like the free hit in terms of being able to nom songs that I haven't been able to fit into any themes but I've also discovered a lot more good stuff through searching for songs to fit a theme than through noms. 6 of one...
 

Loonerty

Moderator
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Posts
36,464
Likes
43,065
Location
Wollongong
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Chelsea
Moderator #1,916
People still had to nom a song for this round

There are 14 or 15 songs that I never would've listened to were it not for the process and this round's 'no theme'.

Despite the complaints, I've enjoyed listening to this batch of tunes. Probably the best playlist we've had since the 'Black performers' round. Even the modern-day rehash/ripoff punk tunes (which I normally despise) all had good riffs & great sections. I don't know why anyone was expecting to be blown away by our selections - we're still the same bunch of twats with questionable taste & limited knowledge. Not like we had Henry Wagons or Jarvis Cocker picking the songs for this round.

You said that picking a song to fit the theme is "part of the challenge", but what's so challenging about using Google, or scrolling through your music folder using a search filter ?

Some people say they give votes according to the theme, but that's bullshit. e.g. Iron Maiden's 'Number Of the Beast' won the Talking Blues round. It has a 20 second bible reading from a Vincent Price imposter - the intro is superfluous to the song itself. It was probably the only song from that round which didn't really fit the theme. All the other noms had spoken word sections in the song, or spoken-singing, which was the host's intention. ('Rime of the Ancient Mariner' would've been a better fit from the Iron Maiden catalog.)

People don't vote for songs which best fit the theme - they vote for the songs they like best. The theme just gives us a chance to pick on 1 or 2 songs each round and argue over whether they should've been allowed. So for this round, we don't have those arguments. No great loss.
I definitely vote for songs that fit the theme then go by favouritism unless it is a perennial nom or has podiumed.
 

Back One Out

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 2, 2015
Posts
11,683
Likes
19,171
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
GAGF
I definitely vote for songs that fit the theme then go by favouritism unless it is a perennial nom or has podiumed.
Yeah, me too. All I'm saying is that 90% of songs in every round fit the theme to whatever degree. So we ignore/billy the ones which don't fit and then vote for the songs we like best. The theme simply serves as a valve.
 

Barney_stinson

All Australian
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Posts
636
Likes
608
Location
Townsville
AFL Club
Adelaide
For some reason, people got shitty with me when I did that :D

I thought it was productive way to melt over the results.

Maybe people get resentful when a noob comes on here and tells people they suck.
Ya think!!!

For the record, I've never saud anyone "sucks". I've said the song choices have "sucked" but I could have been more politically correct by saying they didn't fit my musical tastes.
 

Back One Out

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 2, 2015
Posts
11,683
Likes
19,171
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
GAGF
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...onday-6pm-aest.1124098/page-219#post-44189576
I've never said anyone "sucks". I've said the song choices have "sucked" but I could have been more politically correct by saying they didn't fit my musical tastes.
Yeah, just paraphrasing. It's how people take it when you question their music taste. It's like you're saying they suck, even though you're not. Our music taste is part of who we are, precious to us, personal, more so than our favourite movie or tv show.

I don't mind having a bit of a barney over music & shit noms. I sorta wish we had more of it in this thread instead of being polite (or having personal goes at each other). Illinois Nazi used to give his scathing reviews for every song and piss people off. We'd bite back and give him shit for being an ignoramus, etc…

Maybe I should bring back the Shame File.
 

Barney_stinson

All Australian
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Posts
636
Likes
608
Location
Townsville
AFL Club
Adelaide
I don't mind having a bit of a barney over music & shit noms. I sorta wish we had more of it in this thread instead of being polite (or having personal goes at each other). Illinois Nazi used to give his scathing reviews for every song and piss people off. We'd bite back and give him shit for being an ignoramus, etc...
The greatest justification someone can have for nominating a song (whore or virgin) is getting the votes from the establishment.

If someone says that song sucks and they get the votes, isn't that 'pie in the face' of the person who said it sucks? Why the need to get upset?

Back your song up and justify it but posting 'a crap unknown song' to avoid the horror of whoring a song isn't (IMO) what this song contest should/could/is about.

This won't go down well with the like of Loonerty and Ulahoopski but I'm going to have my say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom