- Banned
- #1
Hadnt known of this before and it seems to be coming to a head of steam and has the potential to cause generation long angst.
Farm reclamation stepped up
SAfrica gives white farmers deadline
South Africa has warned white farmers it may seize their properties under the land restitution program if they fail to agree on a selling price within six months.
The program aims to hand back land to blacks who were forcibly removed from their ancestral homes under apartheid, or offer them financial compensation.
This is part of efforts to correct skewed land ownership created under white minority rule.
President Thabo Mbeki's government wants 30 per cent of farmland in black hands by 2014 but the transfer process has been slow, with only about 4 per cent of land transferred so far.
Agriculture and Land Affairs Minister Lulu Xingwana said wrangling with whites over price was one of the main reasons for the low turnover.
"We are now going to negotiate six months - no more, no less," she said at a briefing in the northern Limpopo province.
"Indeed, we don't have time to be talking and talking for 10 years ... because already our people have been waiting."
"At least now we have ... expropriation. Therefore we will no longer waste time negotiating with people who are not committed to transformation."
South Africa has been quick to dismiss comparisons with neighbouring Zimbabwe - where a similar campaign was frequently marked by violence - and vowed to take a more orderly approach to addressing its apartheid and British colonial legacy.
Xingwana's department has already identified several properties that will be taken over if it cannot reach agreement over price with the owners, but it is the first time the government has set a time limit on such talks.
Officials stressed this would only be used as a last resort and farmers have the right to appeal against the decision in court.
Land claims are an especially emotive part of the post-apartheid reforms as they often bring white families who have lived on the land for generations up against blacks whose historical ties to the land run even deeper.
So far, 89 per cent of the nearly 80,000 claims that were lodged by the December 1998 cut-off date have been settled. The government has set a 2008 deadline to finish the process.
-----------------------------------
This is the only issue of South Africas ( and Zimbabwes) step into post colonialism that worries me . Are the farmers being recognised for their skill in farming the land , where does generational ownership get overtaken by historical ties? Will the person/people reclaiming the land be as good as the previous owners? Now I understand that the whites were allowed to onsell at any time in the last 100 years so emotion cant be used as a defining argument but for those who dont want to go , how must they feel?
From Israel to Zimbabwe to even Australia land reclamation will always have 2 sides on it. In Zimbabwe we have seen the collapse of the farm economy because of the poorly structured and poorly managed handover/takeovers.
My take is that farms are a part of the free trade economy and the farms should be allowed to remain in control of the current owners until such time as the current owners WANT to sell. Forcing owners to sell at government rates will only lead to many more problems down the track, economically as well as sciologically
Farm reclamation stepped up
SAfrica gives white farmers deadline
South Africa has warned white farmers it may seize their properties under the land restitution program if they fail to agree on a selling price within six months.
The program aims to hand back land to blacks who were forcibly removed from their ancestral homes under apartheid, or offer them financial compensation.
This is part of efforts to correct skewed land ownership created under white minority rule.
President Thabo Mbeki's government wants 30 per cent of farmland in black hands by 2014 but the transfer process has been slow, with only about 4 per cent of land transferred so far.
Agriculture and Land Affairs Minister Lulu Xingwana said wrangling with whites over price was one of the main reasons for the low turnover.
"We are now going to negotiate six months - no more, no less," she said at a briefing in the northern Limpopo province.
"Indeed, we don't have time to be talking and talking for 10 years ... because already our people have been waiting."
"At least now we have ... expropriation. Therefore we will no longer waste time negotiating with people who are not committed to transformation."
South Africa has been quick to dismiss comparisons with neighbouring Zimbabwe - where a similar campaign was frequently marked by violence - and vowed to take a more orderly approach to addressing its apartheid and British colonial legacy.
Xingwana's department has already identified several properties that will be taken over if it cannot reach agreement over price with the owners, but it is the first time the government has set a time limit on such talks.
Officials stressed this would only be used as a last resort and farmers have the right to appeal against the decision in court.
Land claims are an especially emotive part of the post-apartheid reforms as they often bring white families who have lived on the land for generations up against blacks whose historical ties to the land run even deeper.
So far, 89 per cent of the nearly 80,000 claims that were lodged by the December 1998 cut-off date have been settled. The government has set a 2008 deadline to finish the process.
-----------------------------------
This is the only issue of South Africas ( and Zimbabwes) step into post colonialism that worries me . Are the farmers being recognised for their skill in farming the land , where does generational ownership get overtaken by historical ties? Will the person/people reclaiming the land be as good as the previous owners? Now I understand that the whites were allowed to onsell at any time in the last 100 years so emotion cant be used as a defining argument but for those who dont want to go , how must they feel?
From Israel to Zimbabwe to even Australia land reclamation will always have 2 sides on it. In Zimbabwe we have seen the collapse of the farm economy because of the poorly structured and poorly managed handover/takeovers.
My take is that farms are a part of the free trade economy and the farms should be allowed to remain in control of the current owners until such time as the current owners WANT to sell. Forcing owners to sell at government rates will only lead to many more problems down the track, economically as well as sciologically