Yep.
And its 100 percent correct.
You don't believe in photo evidence?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep.
And its 100 percent correct.
Yeah, bowlers do it tough. But if they bowl a bad ball, they can rectify it.
Batsmen don't get that luxury. One mistake and they are gone. It's a pretty devastating moment generally for a batsman, and the last thing you need is the bowler in your face and/or personal space when it occurs.
I've never liked it. One day a batsman will lose his s**t over it and that alone is good enough reason to eliminate the practice.
I don't expect bowlers to act like "mild mannered angels", but there is plenty of scope for bowlers to celebrate a wicket while also steering clear of the batsman.
I am tooWell I'm glad I've got people like you to tell me what my point is......
Do people honestly want to see this sh*t?
I don't give a s**t what the rules are
Do you find there is someone that needs help in every conversation you take part in?You need help.....
Lol. Was just putting together a photo power point for my wife’s 40th and found some interesting pics in my thumb drive. I must have had a Starc related debate before - there were half a dozen different photos of him giving the batsman a serve.
I tried, but the discussion got personal and I'm not interested those kind of digs. I'd rather talk about the cricket on a cricket board.You need to read ALL posts.....
Keep up.
Look, I know you are arguing for the sake of it. So I will leave you with this thought.
Next time you see a bowler take a wicket, take note of how much available space the bowler has to celebrate - "with emotion" - without encroaching on the space of the batsman he has just dismissed.
Actually, here is an instructional video for you to save you the trouble. Courtesy of Bruce Yardley. You're welcome.
How Sad!What has been forgotten in all of this is the rotten image being left ( esp NSW kids under 9) by our so called cricket heroes on the children
Why are send offs bad behaviour though? You look foolish IMO giving someone a send off if you take a wicket when its 1-400. Its part of the theatre of the contest for mine. When Australia was up in the first test Lyon and Warner gave it out and in the second Rabada gave it back. As long you don't sook about afterwards (like the sledging) when it doesn't go your way I'm all for it
Come on mate, a good send off has been a part of cricket for as long as I've watched itWhy are they bad behaviour? Are you serious?
Running at a player and screaming in his face is clearly bad behaviour. I cannot believe you actually asked that question.
Come on mate, a good send off has been a part of cricket for as long as I've watched it
So how come Warner didn’t get pinged for his running and screaming at Markram - if he got pinged for that it would have been another demerit point and 1 test banWhy are they bad behaviour? Are you serious?
Running at a player and screaming in his face is clearly bad behaviour. I cannot believe you actually asked that question.
So how come Warner didn’t get pinged for his running and screaming at Markram - if he got pinged for that it would have been another demerit point and 1 test ban
When was that? I didn't see it.
Why are send offs bad behaviour though?
So how come Warner didn’t get pinged for his running and screaming at Markram - if he got pinged for that it would have been another demerit point and 1 test ban
Sounds like a typical Starc over
Starc's never made contact with the batsman though.
Thanks for the random Starc fact
Ironic. He could save Umpires from disregarding the rules, but not himself.Am I the only one who finds this hilarious from a poster with your reputation?
Hardly random outside the context of the argument of whether or not Starc does the same thing Rabada does.