Spida is not owed open arms at Hawthorn. He came to the club, when we were at our most vulnerable. He started to believe that WE needed him, more than he needed the club. His attitude and numerous incidents showed total disregard for the club.
As soon as Clarko and co, realised we had players capable to cover Spida we kicked him to the curb.
Spida needs to grow up, and when he doesn't get his way, he needs to stop jumping up and down like a little b*tch.
If a player gets away with such behaviour, then it’s the club that has the problem.
Spida has a strong personality and has had a propensity to push the boundaries of acceptable standards and team rules within a football club – these traits have been known to the football community for almost a decade and a half. Hawthorn would have been fully aware of Spida’s traits long before he joined the club and the club should have had systems in place to deal with any potential problems BEFORE they signed him up.
Sydney is quite a different environment (to Hawthorn of the past 5 years); it has a very strong and settled management and coaching group which has a proven record of not being prepared to cop sh*t from players, (eg the dropping of Nick Davis and the de-listing of Ricky Mott for breaking team rules and unprofessional conduct). Sydney has a pretty good record of handling erstwhile “troublesome” footballers and in some cases turning their careers around – the Spida exercise may blow-up in Sydney’s face, but it’s the type of club that offers the best chance of harnessing his potential.
A lot of the hand wringing by posters in this thread is laughable (questioning Spida’s football ability; questioning his “loyalty” to the club etc).
His ability is good enough to have made him a club B&F.
Hawthorn decided that he should only be offered a one year contract (as is their right) – Spida wanted a longer contract (as is his right). It was a commercial decision for both parties, neither side showed any “loyalty’ to each other.