- Aug 25, 2011
- 25,014
- 75,489
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Coney Island Warriors, SFFC, Hajduk
- Thread starter
- #51
Drawing outside the lines.I can see at least one thing wrong with that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Drawing outside the lines.I can see at least one thing wrong with that.
That's a paddlin'.Drawing outside the lines.
So not followers? (ie RR and Ro as well)2 ruckmen
Good question, has caught alot of people out in the past.So not followers? (ie RR and Ro as well)
Jesus Christ Testy! Did you get your grandkids to fill out your teamsheet for you?
So no ruck required?Good question, has caught alot of people out in the past.
Nope. They're mids.
Two rucks, not ruck rovers or rovers.So no ruck required?
Yep, you're right - sorry man. Weird thing is when I looked the other day the babe was listed on a half back flank...I copied all of the teams and pasted them in notes on my phone so I didn't have to keep going back to the thread to check.Two points:
1) Snitches get stitches. Snitches who don't get their facts right tend to get even more stitches.
2) Whilst both are back flankers in terms of quality and attractiveness, the Swamprats and Gumbies did allow Rich the babe Evans and cats2rise by letting them play ruck in round 16 of season 30. I assume this was purely out of pity and disrespect to both their opponent and the league as a whole.
Ooh, thank god that was asked, otherwise I'd be screwed. Updated team Tiffy:
View attachment 1051255
Cough
I’m just trying to get a leg up on the oppo!Cough