Stadium Redevelopments

[moomba]

None of those companies fund my football club which is what the discussion is about. Stop moving the goalposts.

The discussion is actually about football stadiums and redevelopments. You turned it into a discussion on owners to avoid talking about the Anfield redevelopment and the impact it had on the local community for years.

 

[Zidane98]

So because they do not relate to a football club, but use slaves it's OK?

(I assume it is as it does not suit your narrative)


lol. Do you even know how to argue?

So, do you own products that are made in China? Answer the question.

moomba has said several times he doesn't care.

I'll answer the question once moomba answers what he thinks of his owners ^(human rights abuses / slavery record.

 

[chef]

I think you'll find that plenty of Liverpool fans are against investment from the Middle East / companies with links to communist China. Which puts your argument to bed unless you think they hate their own club.

I think its a bit of a wank if you dont follow these morales through your whole life.

Just another chance to throw a bit of shit at clubs posters hate.

 

[moomba]

I think you'll find that plenty of Liverpool fans are against investment from the Middle East / companies with links to communist China. Which puts your argument to bed unless you think they hate their own club.

 

[Cruyff14]

You are talking about the morales of clubs in a thread about stadiums. Cruyff14 didnt move the posts.

Well, oops

I'll answer the question once moomba answers what he thinks of his owners ^(human rights abuses / slavery record.

Seems you're trying to stall answering the question, even though the answer is clear as day.

Which means only one thing. You're the world's biggest hypocrite.

 

[Cruyff14]

WC when you look in the mirror do you see a dick looking back at you?

Because right now, that's exactly what you look like, and you've done that all by yourself. Congratulations.

 

[Zidane98]

You are talking about the morales of clubs in a thread about stadiums. Cruyff14 didnt move the posts.

The thread talk was abut stadiums until someone posted a mindless jIbe about LFC. I shouldn't have bitten and here we are now.

 

[jd2010]

Maybe you should fact check your claims first from moomba:

https://www.sc.com/sustainability-r...ial_crime/identifying_terrorist_suspects.html

They're accountants. They've bound to have done something questionable. But it's ok to take questionable characters sponsorship money

 

[jd2010]

Also that link was very nice and shiny. Doesn't mean the real world practice is anything like it

 

[Zidane98]

Well, oops


Seems you're trying to stall answering the question, even though the answer is clear as day.

Which means only one thing. You're the world's biggest hypocrite.

The only hypocrite is the person demanding I answer a question completely off topic but won't demand the actual question from the original discussion be answered.

 

[Cruyff14]

Nah, you're definitely a hypocrite too.

 

[moomba]

The thread talk was abut stadiums until someone posted a mindless jIbe about LFC. I shouldn't have bitten and here we are now.

It was a comment about Liverpools redevelopmemt of Anfield. Exactly what this thread is intended for.

 

[chef]

The thread talk was abut stadiums until someone posted a mindless jIbe about LFC. I shouldn't have bitten and here we are now.

Might be time to give it a rest as everyone knows where you stand and its been done to death.

 

[jd2010]

It was a comment about Liverpools redevelopmemt of Anfield. Exactly what this thread is intended for.

He's mentioned that's it been great for those not forced out and then of course great for the club. But those who lived through the derelict area because the club land banked don't really count because they aren't proper LFC Scousers.

As I said all clubs/sponsors have skeletons in their closet. Some big other than others (Chelsea haha), Spurs included (look at our land buying and also how Joe Lewis got rich) so it's very rich for anyone to continually go at another's unless they're forest green supporters.

 

[Zidane98]

They're accountants. They've bound to have done something questionable. But it's ok to take questionable characters sponsorship money

Ok so you've gone from claiming they were funding terrorist groupswhich proved to be rubbish to claiming they are now "em questionable " characters. Bit of a slight difference lol

 

[jd2010]

Ok so you've gone from claiming they were funding terrorist groupswhich proved to be rubbish to claiming they are now "em questionable " characters. Bit of a slight difference lol

That website hasn't proven they didn't help fund terror organisations. They're accountants. They'll help fund whatever organisation pays them and that can hide their dirt. And then they'll put up an ethics web page to show the world they're all soft and cuddly

 

[Zidane98]

He's mentioned that's it been great for those not forced out and then of course great for the club. But those who lived through the derelict area because the club land banked don't really count because they aren't proper LFC Scousers.

As I said all clubs/sponsors have skeletons in their closet. Some big other than others (Chelsea haha), Spurs included (look at our land buying and also how Joe Lewis got rich) so it's very rich for anyone to continually go at another's unless they're forest green supporters.

Of course they do and aa I said with a development like Anfield not everyone is going to be happy. At the end of the day the area has benefitted and life moves on. We're a small amount of owners unhappy ? Yes. Many more would have been unhappy too if the club abandoned the project completely and went for Stanley Park.

 

[jd2010]

Also not copping city getting slated about morals by a supporter of a club whose legend bottled a DJ for not playing a song he wanted lol

 

[Zidane98]

That website hasn't proven they didn't help fund terror organisations. They're accountants. They'll help fund whatever organisation pays them and that can hide their dirt. And then they'll put up an ethics web page to show the world they're all soft and cuddly

Hahahaha so now they are guilty of finding terrorism until proven otherwise. You'd make a great judge in a court case!!!!

 

[moomba]

Ok so you've gone from claiming they were funding terrorist groupswhich proved to be rubbish to claiming they are now "em questionable " characters. Bit of a slight difference lol

They've paid over USD$900m in fines to US authorities in the past five years over breaches in anti money laundering legislation.

 

[jd2010]

Of course they do and aa I said with a development like Anfield not everyone is going to be happy. At the end of the day the area has benefitted and life moves on. We're a small amount of owners unhappy ? Yes. Many more would have been unhappy too if the club abandoned the project completely and went for Stanley Park.

It's not about how many people were effected. It's the questionable land banking tactics of the club to slum down the area in the 90s that is morally wrong imo

 

[jd2010]

Hahahaha so now they are guilty of finding terrorism until proven otherwise. You'd make a great judge in a court case!!!!

I know enough accountants to know they're 100% not squeaky clean!

 

[Zidane98]

I know enough accountants to know they're 100% not squeaky clean!

Banks & accountants never are of course. Bit of a leap to funding terrorism though!

 

[Zidane98]

They've paid over USD$900m in fines to US authorities in the past five years over breaches in anti money laundering legislation.

That's a bit different to the original funding of terror claim you made.

 

[jd2010]

Banks & accountants never are of course. Bit of a leap to funding terrorism though!

Some of the laundering would end up in the hands of terrible people. Terrorists or not. People only launder dirty money which normally involves bloodshed