Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Strawman argument.I don't understand how people think it's appropriate to defend serial human rights abusers by deflecting.
These people are scum and are every bit as bad as the worst dictators in history.
The 2 wrongs make a right argument is kindergarten shit
You're just flat out lying now.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
My only claim is that they've been accused of funding terrorist organisations.That's what you've been doing for the last 10 pages with your absolutely laughable Standered Chartered terrorism claims.
What has Sheikh Mansour been found guilty of?
My only claim is that they've been accused of funding terrorist organisations.
Which is 100% true. They have been accused no matter how much you close your eyes and refuse to see.
so why are you talking about SC if not to bizarrely validate human rights abuse.Strawman argument.
No one is defending serial human rights abusers.
I've said that I don't know what goes on in Abu Dhabi, and if I did a football forum wouldnt be the appropriate place to discuss it.
The fact that you an WC want to make this a football issue says a lot to me.
do you just read posts and then rearrange them in your head to suit what you want? genuinely wondering. no one has said they're guilty. just that they have been accused. which is the exact same thing that has happened to the sheikh. but that's different cos you know everything is for certain where that is concerned.It's not true and is 100% incorrect. SC are guilty of not picking up money laundering - as are most large multinational banks.
They have not and have never been found guilty of funding terrorism. But it isn't surprising that you continue this nonsense.
so why are you talking about SC if not to bizarrely validate human rights abuse.
There is plenty of information on it from respected investigative journalists and human rights organisations.
Where else do you want me to discuss it. It is a football related issue and is part of a wider strategy for these countries to improve their image through football. The world cup is going to qatar ffs.
I've never said they are guilty of it.It's not true and is 100% incorrect. SC are guilty of not picking up money laundering - as are most large multinational banks.
They have not and have never been found guilty of funding terrorism. But it isn't surprising that you continue this nonsense.
do you just read posts and then rearrange them in your head to suit what you want? genuinely wondering. no one has said they're guilty. just that they have been accused. which is the exact same thing that has happened to the sheikh. but that's different cos you know everything is for certain where that is concerned.
WC was talking about ISIS. It had bothing to do with human rights.so why are you talking about SC if not to bizarrely validate human rights abuse.
There is plenty of information on it from respected investigative journalists and human rights organisations.
Where else do you want me to discuss it. It is a football related issue and is part of a wider strategy for these countries to improve their image through football. The world cup is going to qatar ffs.
how do you know for certain that it didnt?
This whole argument is kindergarten shit. Thread hasn't been on topic for pages.I don't understand how people think it's appropriate to defend serial human rights abusers by deflecting.
These people are scum and are every bit as bad as the worst dictators in history.
The 2 wrongs make a right argument is kindergarten shit
due to mountains of deflectionThis whole argument is kindergarten shit. Thread hasn't been on topic for pages.
what the hell do you think you're doing!?OT is going to get work done in the summer this year to expand the area for disabled spectators. Apparently this will decrease the capacity to 72,500. With the others building new stadiums and new stands, boosting the main stand should be in the back of the Glazers' minds. According to Andy Mitten, this would increase capacity to 80k and then with further development, to 88k. If it wasn't for the damn railway tracks and housing behind the main stand, I'd suspect these developments would've already been done and dusted.
Who cares? It's been 7 pages since this thread discussed its topic.due to mountains of deflection
plenty it seemsWho cares? It's been 7 pages since this thread discussed its topic.
My bad. Mods move to appropriate threadwhat the hell do you think you're doing!?