What on earth are you trying to say here. Because SJW is a pejorative that covers many things, it actually diminishes its effect? SJW is a broad term used to whinge about everything from women to people of other races to sexual identity. You know, social justice concepts like equality. It absolutely can be sexist (and racist) and usually is. When people say Star Wars has become too SJW, it invariably relates to the fact it has a woman in a position of strength, a black man in a position of strength, anAsian woman etc.
Star Wars Episode V - Princess Leia in a position of power and esteem within the Rebellion, also a woman - Lando Calrissian, the leader of an entire mining colony/city, also a black man.
Is the Empire Strikes Back an "SJW" movie? No it is not.
Your point is wrong, being "SJW" does not relate to having women or diverse characters in positions of power, it is about exploring, or pandering, to fringe social theories perpetuated by real life social justice warriors, while detracting from the main story.
Effectively, an "SJW" movie is a movie that has a context that demands one type of action - say that a general in a rebellion fleet would keep the captain of her fighter pilot fleet in the loop about a plan they have developed - and yet elects not to portray that action (which is demanded by the context) in order to promote an external social agend, in this case Holdo not telling Poe the plan because he's a stupid arrogant man and Holdo and her all female leadership cast can sort this out without a man's influence. By doing this, a film creates a critical error that ruins narrative flow where the audience is left wondering, why the **** did that character do that? And the answer is... so Hollywood elites can feel good about themselves and the film might get a positivie write up in the Huffington Post or some other leftist rag.