Can i make the call of i think sheedy should coach the Vics.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can i make the call of i think sheedy should coach the Vics.
Don't get too excited everyone - this is just a one-off for the 150th anniversary of Australian Rules Football. It won't go any further.
A question though - Why is the AFL celebrating the 150th anniversary of Australian Rules Football? I thought it (and many of its foundation teams' supporters) didn't care about anything that wasn't part of the VFL/AFL est 1897?
Or does everything Victorian that preceded the VFL/AFL matter, but not anything anywhere else in Australia?
Good news. At that time Juddy will be accustomed to wearing the navy blue...
who cares?
Why wouldn't the AFL celebrate the 150th anniversary of Australian Rules Football? Just because it started as a different competition doesn't mean they shouldn't celebrate the games creation... What do you mean we don't care about anything pre-VFL/AFL? Are you saying that we don't care about the first 50 years of our clubs history?Don't get too excited everyone - this is just a one-off for the 150th anniversary of Australian Rules Football. It won't go any further.
A question though - Why is the AFL celebrating the 150th anniversary of Australian Rules Football? I thought it (and many of its foundation teams' supporters) didn't care about anything that wasn't part of the VFL/AFL est 1897?
Or does everything Victorian that preceded the VFL/AFL matter, but not anything anywhere else in Australia?
who cares?
I'd rather have the ACT in there then have a team sit out. No doubt the league will squeeze as much money as they can out of this so they might have a team (who will lose every game anyway).Has to include all states, otherwise it will crash and burn.
Make it a rolling system. 1v2, 3v4, 5v6, 7th team sits out.
Everybody gets a chance of being "Champions of Australia", no state misses out, and games are less likely to be a blowout.
Perfect.
Eighty six per cent of players want interstate football to be re-introduced, while 11 of the 16 clubs are also in favour.
Let's hope it's in the pre season, because if its mid season game their is no way it will be fair dinkum, clubs will protect their stars mid season, at least in pre season they will want match practice.
Why? I don't understand this line of thinking.
The pre-season competition isn't for the fans. It is a chance for coaches to trial their youngsters in a semi-competitive situation. It also allows the players to get some valuable match practice before the season-proper.
Replace the IR, but the Pre-season comp is there for a reason.
If it was as simple as one state v the other state it would work - NRL SOO is fairly clear cut.
AFL has 3 major states, 2 mid range (QLD, Tas) ans one minor (NSW) Its a good problem to have as it shows the game is doing well.
Its a shemozzle to make a series out of.
Someone suggested a 'rolling' finals type thir the stats seeded 1v2, 3v4 and 5v6, with the loser and winners to swap each year. theyd have to play a game each home and away for it to be 'fair'