When was the last time a side only kicked one point for the game as Sydney did tonight?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

StK v HAW · CAR v GEE · SYD v RIC · BL v FRE · WB v COL · MEL v GWS · WCE v ESS ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
2010 Rd. 16 - Brisbane 7.1 vs. Hawthorn 17.16When was the last time a side only kicked one point for the game as Sydney did tonight?
Last night in the Tigers/Swans game the opening quarter lasted 38:57 and the final quarter 25:36. Am I right in assuming they're the longest and shortest quarters this year?
Also, when was the last match with such an extensive gap between its shortest and longest quarters?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Taking AFL to mean VFL/AFL, I'm going to suggest University is the clubhouse leader.Which club has had the highest average ladder position in their time in the AFL?
Which club has had the highest average ladder position in their time in the AFL?
Which player has had the highest average ladder position over their career?
Last time 3 teams lost with 100+ points?
Just an amazing round of football, this one! There had only been two games all season with both teams scoring 100+ points, now we've had three games in one round. Throw in some major upsets (with another one looking very likely to happen) and it has been quite incredible!Last time 3 teams lost with 100+ points?
nb: this was for the ladder position in every round, whereas Ron has just used end-of-year ladder positionslast one I'm doing, Geelong take the lead with 5.85, my money says they almost certainly win
1944 Rd. 13: North Melbourne 11.21 (87) d. Richmond 14.2 (86)In 1918 VFA Round 5 - North Melbourne kicked 5 29 (59) to Brunswick's 8 6 (54)
North Melbourne kicked 3 goals less than Brunswick...but still won.
Has this ever happened in the VFL/AFL...or any other competition?
That's cool, but I believe it would be a lot more relevant to create an equation that calculates a team's average finishing ladder position as a percentage based on the number of opponents they faced each season.Using only end of year positions and making no allowance for number of teams
Club|Ladder
\Co|4.9
\Ca|5.4
\Es|5.71
\Ge|5.74
\WC|6.90
\Ri|6.92
\Fi|6.93
\Sy|7.0
\Me|7.3
\Ha|7.4
\Ad|7.5
\NM|7.8
\WB|8.0
\PA|8.2
\St|8.3
\Un|8.4
\Br|10.4
\Fr|10.5
\GWS|11.8
\GC|15.4
That's cool, but I believe it would be a lot more relevant to create an equation that calculates a team's average finishing ladder position as a percentage based on the number of opponents they faced each season.
I.e. Finishing 5th in an eight team competition should have exactly the same weight as a team finishing 10th in a 16 team competition.
In the above two examples, a team has finished above 44.4% of the field. Using that percentage as a guide, would it be possible to rank teams using this method?

In 1918 VFA Round 5 - North Melbourne kicked 5 29 (59) to Brunswick's 8 6 (54)
North Melbourne kicked 3 goals less than Brunswick...but still won.
Has this ever happened in the VFL/AFL...or any other competition?
Ablett and Judd are probably the most famous examples. They both received three votes in matches their teams got smashed in.In the Herald Sun's Player of the Year award today, four of the players who received the three votes (best on ground) were from the losing team. Equating this to the Brownlow, is anybody able to determine which rounds have seen three Brownlow votes given to the most players from losing teams? It was tricky wording this question, hope it makes sense.
1944 Rd. 13: North Melbourne 11.21 (87) d. Richmond 14.2 (86)
https://afltables.com/afl/seas/1944.html#13
That is the only such occurrence in the VFL/AFL.
Edit: Not a win, but a draw in the 1948 Grand Final: Essendon 7.27 (69) vs. Melbourne 10.9 (69)
https://afltables.com/afl/seas/1948.html#fin
One of the more famous/infamous scores/results in the competition's history, I would say, especially given that Melbourne won the replay very easily!
Also a draw in Rd. 7 1935: Footscray 12.7 (79) vs. Carlton 9.25 (79)
https://afltables.com/afl/seas/1935.html#7