Moderator
#176
You dont seem to understand the terms inside and outside midfielders.
All those players are OUTSIDE midfielders.They arent game breakers, and they wont be able to change a game within 5 minutes. Palmer is an inside midfielder because he wins his own ball. He is probably the only consistent one in your squad and he COULD become a game breaker if he improves his kicking. If you want to contend for a flag, you can't have a team full of outside midfielders or you will be smashed. And Schammer? Okay he is going good, but what happens to him when the pressure is on? You dont have the depth of inside midfielders, while you have plenty of outside midfielders. Its the reason why your team can't make most of Sandiland's dominance in the ruck.
On the flip side we have plenty of inside midfielders and we lack depth in our outside midfielders, which isnt a problem because in every draft you can pick up speedy outside midfielders at around the 20-50 pick range.
We wont find out which team has the better future for atleast another year or two. So anything said right now is just an opinion and not fact.
All those players are OUTSIDE midfielders.They arent game breakers, and they wont be able to change a game within 5 minutes. Palmer is an inside midfielder because he wins his own ball. He is probably the only consistent one in your squad and he COULD become a game breaker if he improves his kicking. If you want to contend for a flag, you can't have a team full of outside midfielders or you will be smashed. And Schammer? Okay he is going good, but what happens to him when the pressure is on? You dont have the depth of inside midfielders, while you have plenty of outside midfielders. Its the reason why your team can't make most of Sandiland's dominance in the ruck.
On the flip side we have plenty of inside midfielders and we lack depth in our outside midfielders, which isnt a problem because in every draft you can pick up speedy outside midfielders at around the 20-50 pick range.
We wont find out which team has the better future for atleast another year or two. So anything said right now is just an opinion and not fact.
C Judd found his own ball at the same time had no problems carrying the ball.
With the eagles I see a whole group of either inside outside mids (Mainly inside). Very one dimensional players who I have no doubt would look good if you still had Judd and Cousins, but you don't.
Hill will in time prove to be both.
Mundy has taken great leaps to being both, however I agree has some way to go.
Suban hasn't really been given the opportunity, so but time is on his side.
