Opinion Stephen Silvagni

Remove this Banner Ad

agro

Premiership Player
Jun 7, 2003
4,794
11,321
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
I think you're reading far too much into a comment made to highlight that the extra pick was a complete freebie, and we didn't have to "compromise" to get it. Wanted Kemp, got Kemp, also got a free hit at 20.

I also think it's clear that Philp was an astute pick up. Sounding like plenty of clubs were interested at the picks following ours. He has a good head on his shoulders, a strong work ethic, and some really impressive athletic attributes. Read the comments from the Knights talent manager, it paints a clear picture. This wasn't a "reach" for the sake of it, it was a targeted acquisition of a player who impressed the hell out of the club's recruiters, and happens to fit the specific needs the coach has apparently laid out.

Clubs that are already overloaded with midfielders- like Richmond were interested in Philp.

Clubs like us who are not overloaded with midfielders (and will struggle when or if our premier midfielder Cripps gets injured) - should have gone and would have gone for the percentage pick in Robertson, not Philp.

I wish Philp all the best - and hope he becomes the player he needs to be for us.
 

Kramer1

Norm Smith Medallist
Oct 8, 2007
9,883
18,371
AFL Club
Carlton
Clubs that are already overloaded with midfielders- like Richmond were interested in Philp.

Clubs like us who are not overloaded with midfielders (and will struggle when or if our premier midfielder Cripps gets injured) - should have gone and would have gone for the percentage pick in Robertson, not Philp.

I wish Philp all the best - and hope he becomes the player he needs to be for us.
Geelong just lost Tim Kelly and went for De Koning over Robertson..is Wells naive and pigheaded too?
 

JustaBattler

Everyone Looks Better In Blue
May 31, 2012
18,965
31,281
AFL Club
Carlton
How did Ratten and Malthouse interfere?
I’m sure all coaches and coaching staff brief their recruiting team about the type of players they want or feel will benefit the team.
This is an interesting discussion in its own right.

I'm on the side of coaches having serious input into trading and to a lesser extent drafting and quite liked to see Teague at the table on draft night.
However
this input has to be weighed against the overall balance and settings of the list at any particular point in time.

I imagine that sides with 'set lists' can concentrate much more on immediate 'needs' than sides whose lists are in the process of being put together.

With Hawthorn/Geelong/Richmond I see strong evidence of trades being made to plug immediate needs - all the time - whilst later picks are about longer term development

Carlton during rebuild were in no position (or lets say in a compromised position) to address so called 'immediate needs' - the overall balance of the list and the reality of building from base zero suited a medium term approach to construction. Talls/Mids and then the 'rest'.

This year saw the first indications of looking to trade in for needs (eg Papley)

what will ensure that the rebuild continues to be as good as possible under anyone's watch - is that both quality and value in traded in players ticked. Inexperienced operators will tend to overpay for a perceived key target - this is cardinal error #1 in portfolio construction. Inexperienced managers will also tend to hold on to an underperforming player for too long - this is cardinal error #2 in portfolio management.

What makes for an excellent List Manager is ruthlessness and focus on continual marginal improvement to both 'duration' of playing list ie average age being balanced AND satisfying needs.

There is an inherent 'tension' always between what a coach might want right now and what good list management demands.

I think talk of what Ratten did or didn't do has to be considered in the light of a basket case Club at the time - and the pressure he was always under to out perform.

In the case of Malthouse - I think he was just out of control and full of unjustified hubris in every area that he touched.

Carlton has moved from individual 'messiah' to a more corporate model throughout the organisation - however this movement necessarily involved a period of great control over list management ( portfolio construction) to SOS - because sometimes in early stages of business building - leadership and fast results is about giving total control over to the type of person who can actually do the job.

The next list manger inherits a much better balanced list and the opportunity for more coach involvement increases accordingly.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

bigm386

Premiership Player
May 17, 2012
4,224
8,209
AFL Club
Carlton
I don't want him to go either, but we could not 'manage' the situation.

Here's what I heard and I must say that some of it could be incorrect and some of it has been raised through the course of the year:
Silvagni has been a thorn in peoples side for some time now, including Boltons. They did not get on.
The real heat started coming on earlier this year when it was realised that SOS wielded too much power at the club.
The heat also contained the way we treated some possible recruits and the way we viewed our later and rookie selections.
Liddle wanted a review of the situation but SOS did not like this idea at all.
Other football department people didn't get on with SOS either and Teague's needs were dismissed. (Big problem)

* I want to see this one play out but it's possible a board member has sided with Liddle, whereas MLG sided with SOS.

This is the interesting part to me should the fight also be in the board room and you know what? It bloody well should be.
This is the first year to me that we actually used the rookie draft for players with upside rather than recycled spuds. So are you saying that SOS didn't get his way this year?
 

Blue__Balls

Norm Smith Medallist
Aug 22, 2014
9,970
31,722
AFL Club
Carlton
Clubs that are already overloaded with midfielders- like Richmond were interested in Philp.

Clubs like us who are not overloaded with midfielders (and will struggle when or if our premier midfielder Cripps gets injured) - should have gone and would have gone for the percentage pick in Robertson, not Philp.

I wish Philp all the best - and hope he becomes the player he needs to be for us.
Cripps, Setterfield, Walsh, Murphy, Curnow, Stocker, Dow, Fisher, SPS, Kennedy, Gibbons, Cuningham...

I mean, we've got plenty of mids, just that lots of them are stil developing. Robertson doesn't help that.

I'm also not sure why you're so sure he's the "percentage pick" - is it just that the draft coverage had him going higher? Some had him top 10, but that was on the basis that Freo would take him as a local prospect. Outside that he was expected to go in the later teens, so we haven't gone and passed on an "elite" slider.

Philp is clearly a very hard worker, has a great athletic profile, improved throughout the year, and featured in the Knights' bests in 24 consecutive games. He averaged 22 disposals, 6 tackles and 6 clearances a game - it's not like he's a raw, rangey tall - he had a strong season and addresses an obvious need.

How did Robertson interview?
 

Lace_Out

Premiership Player
Oct 1, 2014
4,996
9,116
AFL Club
Carlton
It's no secret that Silvagni is hard to deal with.
He doesn't let many people into his life and doesn't particularly care for accumulating friends. His prerogative and more-so his nature.
He's an icon of the club and knows he can get away with things others may not be able to and then there's his standing amongst the high-end friends he does have at the club (MLG)

Silvagni will go but for this to be a favourable outcome MLG should go also. He really should and maybe even Judd with him.
MLG had tied himself to Bolton but cut the ties last minute. He's tied himself to SOS and even offered him another job apparently.....To his mate.

Call it an agenda if you want but if the boys club was to be dismantled MLG would be a key ticket to tear up and then we'd have a genuine fresh start.
The way I see it, I think it's quite possible this may come but it's going to take a lot of work prising MLG out of the chair he loves.
Pretty much summed up.

He clashed with Bolts earlier in the year as well due to Bolts playing Polson ahead of Jack and likely well before that.
From what I heard SOS wasn't that well liked.

For the record we needed him as he undoubtedly has the best interests of the club and we were desperate for someone we could trust.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

agro

Premiership Player
Jun 7, 2003
4,794
11,321
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Cripps, Setterfield, Walsh, Murphy, Curnow, Stocker, Dow, Fisher, SPS, Kennedy, Gibbons, Cuningham...

I mean, we've got plenty of mids, just that lots of them are stil developing. Robertson doesn't help that.

I'm also not sure why you're so sure he's the "percentage pick" - is it just that the draft coverage had him going higher? Some had him top 10, but that was on the basis that Freo would take him as a local prospect. Outside that he was expected to go in the later teens, so we haven't gone and passed on an "elite" slider.

Philp is clearly a very hard worker, has a great athletic profile, improved throughout the year, and featured in the Knights' bests in 24 consecutive games. He averaged 22 disposals, 6 tackles and 6 clearances a game - it's not like he's a raw, rangey tall - he had a strong season and addresses an obvious need.

How did Robertson interview?

Take Cripps out of that list and how many games do we win in 2020.

Take Dustin Martin out of Richmond’s midfield and how many games do they win in 2020.
 

Nori

Club Legend
Nov 16, 2014
1,606
3,824
AFL Club
Carlton
Apart from the leaks to the press, which could have come from anywhere, this is great.

SOS has strong views on the independence of the list management process and if he sees an issue then why not convey it to the board and what they do with it after that is up to them.

Interestingly when SOS left GWS there was also speculation that he was unhappy about interference, so I’d imagine this is fairly common problem within football clubs.
 

agro

Premiership Player
Jun 7, 2003
4,794
11,321
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Geelong just lost Tim Kelly and went for De Koning over Robertson..is Wells naive and pigheaded too?

They’ve got plenty of quality miss and a few developing good ones like Constable - they identified a need for a quality tall as more important.

I hope we tie up Tom long term, because the De Koning family looked mighty happy when Sam was drafted.
 

Stamos

Brownlow Medallist
Mar 30, 2010
14,034
22,059
AFL Club
Carlton
Clubs that are already overloaded with midfielders- like Richmond were interested in Philp.

Clubs like us who are not overloaded with midfielders (and will struggle when or if our premier midfielder Cripps gets injured) - should have gone and would have gone for the percentage pick in Robertson, not Philp.

I wish Philp all the best - and hope he becomes the player he needs to be for us.
What nonsense.
Philp is an inside mid. Dow is an inside mid.
Aside from all the clubs before us who didn't pick Robertson, Port traded down twice rather than pick him.
 

Blue__Balls

Norm Smith Medallist
Aug 22, 2014
9,970
31,722
AFL Club
Carlton
This is the first year to me that we actually used the rookie draft for players with upside rather than recycled spuds. So are you saying that SOS didn't get his way this year?
It's possible this is the year SOS would have chosen to change tack with the late pick strategy anyway, so it's hard to say. The list is at that point now, where recycled mature-agers serve less of a purpose, given we have a greater pool of "ready" players to select from.

I think it's crystal clear that Teague has had significant input into what attributes he wanted the recruiters to target. Unlikely he took them a list of names 3 months ago, because he wouldn't have known the players, but he may have highlighted a few names after sitting in on interviews. Still, I doubt he would have been saying "SOS, I don't care what you have to give up, you need to draft Player X". Much more likely it was a collaborative effort to put together a shortlist of players, who could then be grouped by where we expected them to go in the draft (eg. Stephens, Young, Serong > Kemp > Philp, Dow > Ramsay, Honey > Phillips - with whatever other names might have been in the mix).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Jeremias

Moderator
Sep 26, 2004
38,600
40,441
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
MUFC, LAL, PSG
Great. So that's one opinion in many.

We get it, you don't like OBrien. But in discussing the Swans taking Stevens in the last week, Twomey said that they were desperate to draft him in 2017. They had pick 14. It's hardly a massive reach.
But other clubs laughed at us!!!

:rolleyes:
 

HARKER

Hall of Famer
Oct 15, 2008
49,611
85,151
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
This is the first year to me that we actually used the rookie draft for players with upside rather than recycled spuds. So are you saying that SOS didn't get his way this year?
I'm not saying that but as was evident after the draft, I was thrilled with our approach.
An approach I feel we could have invested in a couple of years earlier.
Even if Honey and Phillips fail, we've gone after the right types at the right time.
Also, our targets that we 'reached' for via the ND, suit the profile needs for the list.

The reason I don't want to lose SOS now, is that we seem to have everything in place when it comes to what counts.....If SOS doesn't get on with some people at the club so be it. Give him a cage of his own and allow him to do what he does best - Negotiate and broker deals....but that's not going to happen now.
 

Stamos

Brownlow Medallist
Mar 30, 2010
14,034
22,059
AFL Club
Carlton
Yes that’s right I’ve dared to criticise SOS here at his alter - I guess we have to cue John Cleese for the stoning scene in Life of Brian.

Here Stamos, you have a couple of big flat ones and Kramer you can go with a pointy one and a packet of gravel.
LOL
I'm not saying that SOS is beyond reproach, I'm just saying that you wouldn't be doing a better job.
So you should stop acting like you would be.

And continuing to say that taking O'Brien was a mistake, or that Philp ahead of Robertson was a mistake, at this stage is ridiculous.
We've noted your objections. Come back in 5 years to gloat if you're right.
 

agro

Premiership Player
Jun 7, 2003
4,794
11,321
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
LOL
I'm not saying that SOS is beyond reproach, I'm just saying that you wouldn't be doing a better job.
So you should stop acting like you would be.

And continuing to say that taking O'Brien was a mistake, or that Philp ahead of Robertson was a mistake, at this stage is ridiculous.
We've noted your objections. Come back in 5 years to gloat if you're right.

I’m giving you inside industry discussion how our drafting is viewed - not acting like how I could have done better.
 

Remove this Banner Ad