Steve Johnson vs Jason Akermanis

[Hodgepodge]

Who's the better player?

 

[MARVELDC]

AKKA all the way!

 

[sirlothie]

Not a fair comparison right now because SJ is at his peak and Aka is past 30 but at his peak, Akermanis better than Johnson. Considerably.

SJ never played in the middle.

 

[Claude Balls]

At his peak, Aker was a midfielder, so there's no need to be pendantic and make qualifications.

Right now, and one can only assume that is the point of this poll, Johnson is better than Aker.

 

[davey_magik]

They've been pretty close this year, Aka maybe just shading Johnson, but when they are both done in their careers Aka will be far and away the better player.

 

[Fitz roos]

Aker is still very good, just not as good as his prime years. ATM i would say Johnson is a bit better, but noth can turn games very quickly

 

[legitimatic]

Wow, Akermanis easily.

 

[Souup]

How is Steve Johnson winning this poll?

Akermanis easilly

 

[Monkster]

Aker is still very good, just not as good as his prime years. ATM i would say Johnson is a bit better, but noth can turn games very quickly

You realise that Aker is on target (statistically) for his best ever season right?

 

[Vegas.]

Yeah, Aker. But I'd rather have Johnson.

 

[BLUE BLEEDING]

aka in his primal days with brisbane.
and is still as good or better than johnson.

 

[Claude Balls]

You realise that Aker is on target (statistically) for his best ever season right?

Geez, not even mods have the sense to take stats with a grain of salt.

I wonder how his best ever year - statistically speaking - will compare qualitatively with his brownlow year, or any of the several other years in which he figured as a key member of the fab four?

 

[Rosella]

Not a fair comparison right now because SJ is at his peak and Aka is past 30 but at his peak, Akermanis better than Johnson. Considerably.

SJ never played in the middle.

He does, actually