Re: Stuart Dew, looking sharp!
Your average non-Hawthorn BF Poster.
Is that even possible?
Your average non-Hawthorn BF Poster.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Is that even possible?
If that is your interpritation of a draft pick well used then the whole football fraternity thanks you for not ever getting involved in football decision making.
30 goals a season is nothing to be scoffed at, however let’s do a quick comparison. Nathan Ablett kicked about 30 goals last season and is about 20, Dew is 28. Nathan Ablett was is good physical shape, Dew clearly is not. Nathan Ablett had (has) plenty of time to develop his game and improve, Dew does not. Nathan Ablett had the potential to be a great player, Dew has been a great player but will never reach those same heights again.
Now the reason I used Nathan as an example in this instance is because I think most of you will agree that he was a standard player with potential if given time and he really applied himself. And to be honest there are dozen’s of players nation wide with similar characteristics to Nathan.
So why not picked a young player over an older over weight player? When you can easily get the same input.
I doubt we drafted Dew to kick over 50 goals a season. I doubt many small non marking players would have that kind of pressure on them.
What about goal assists, setting up play, kicking efficiency, experience in a young group which can't be measured with stats but is vitally important, or his ability to break the flood meaning coaches have to change their gameplan a little if we have C. Young and S. Dew outside 50, they can't just drop players back.
Competition for spots is hot, and Dew has a lot of work to do, but we were certainly in a position to trade a pick in the third round to take on a player like Dew, and probably were one club it makes sense to take a punt on him.
Easily get the same output in the third round than a 28/29 premiership player?
We got him to make an impact immediately, I doubt many young players could have Dew's potential impact immediatley, at the ground or around the club at training.
Break the flood? Are you implying Dew will be firstly nullifying his direct opponent and then stream out of defence and hit Buddy lace out? Every coach in the AFL would love to see Dew line up against them on the half back or half forward line.
They can expose his lack of pace, lack of fitness at both sides of the ground. Running half back players like McLeod and Graham would have a field day on Dew. And forward players could drag him back to the square and completely nullify his entire existence on the field
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Your average non-Hawthorn BF Poster.
![]()
(Im not comparing ability)
Well then don't bother.
Your average non-Hawthorn BF Poster.
![]()
All Im saying, is that pace isnt eveything, Dew still has some good skills, and a good footy brain, hed defanatley be a walk up start at carlton, even now, without losing the few extra kilos that he is on target for!
Well considering Carlton's general youth policy I'd say he wouldn't be a walk up start. Also can't dispute that although he had many MANY well publised faults Lance Whitnall had a great footy brain, and as history has shown that can only get you so far.
What good is a football smart's when you team's will look to expose his weight, speed and undeniable one dimensional football?
Lance made captain of your great club!
Dew being one dimensional is debatable!
Stuart Dew chucked in the towell stating 'lack of passion' what's your point.
And on being 1 dimensional his physical attributes limit his ability to such an extent that he can only be used one way.
Describe Greg Williams 'physical attributes' ?
Describe the era in which Greg Williams played. Even though it is only 10 years since he retired the game has changed significantly since then. Even though Greg Williams would probably still be in the best 22 at most clubs today, there would be plenty of opposition coaches ready to exploit his lack of pace by rotating 2-3 run with players against him. Something he didn't have to worry about when he played.
BTW, Greg Williams had much more football smarts than Dew, but that wouldn't have been enough to see him dominate today, like he did during his career.
Describe Greg Williams 'physical attributes' ?
Are you saying Dew has no chance in todays game?
Are you saying Dew has no chance in todays game?
I'm saying he is the obvious weak link. He cannot chase his direct opponent, so they will run off him all day regardless of his position. He has never been a great mark, he certainly is not quick and has no vertical leap.
His only upside is his kicking skill's, and they will only be an upside if his kicks are more damaging than his oppenent's. Which considering he can't chase them all day mean's they are likely to get it a fair bit more than him shouldn't be to difficult
Forget Dew, how good is Hodgey looking!
Fair assesment!
Although, I see him playing a pinch hitter role off the bench, or a hard body forward who can be damaging off either foot! He has great skills, and brings his teamates into the game, a great expierienced player who sets a great training example to the young hawks who is a great asset to the hawthorn football club!
Also, I just like to see the fatboys do well!![]()
As usual he isnt looking as good as Judd. Always the bridesmaid...![]()
As usual he isnt looking as good as Judd. Always the bridesmaid...![]()
If that is your interpritation of a draft pick well used then the whole football fraternity thanks you for not ever getting involved in football decision making.
30 goals a season is nothing to be scoffed at, however let’s do a quick comparison. Nathan Ablett kicked about 30 goals last season and is about 20, Dew is 28. Nathan Ablett was is good physical shape, Dew clearly is not. Nathan Ablett had (has) plenty of time to develop his game and improve, Dew does not. Nathan Ablett had the potential to be a great player, Dew has been a great player but will never reach those same heights again.
Now the reason I used Nathan as an example in this instance is because I think most of you will agree that he was a standard player with potential if given time and he really applied himself. And to be honest there are dozen’s of players nation wide with similar characteristics to Nathan.
So why not picked a young player over an older over weight player? When you can easily get the same input.