i think people on here are getting the two situations confused...baker is the one who hit the richmond player, hamill was the tripping charge. i think you'll find a hell of a lot of st.kilda supporters myself included were disgusted at bakers act, it really was pathetic, regardless of what happened before it you can't go around punching guys in the face! but to call him a sniper is a bit rich, it's not like he gets reported every week for this stuff, he's a dirty player but most of the time doesn't get out of control like yesterday, he's no libba that's for sure.
And all this crap about amnesia is rediclious, as if that makes a difference or not he still hit the guy, what does it matter if he remembered it..he was obviously well enough to find the richmond players face to make deliberate contact with. 4-6 for sure, we can replace him. Thomo should have come straight out and said that kind of stuff isn't on, you can't defend a bloke who blatently hits a guy behind play!!!
Anywho..hamill...didn't see the incident and they couldn't replay it on channel 10 either because they didn't have any footage of it so what happens here?? is there extra footage they can show at the hearing?? or is it his word against the umps??