No buts. They are different and you're trying to base your line of arguing on an apples to oranges comparison. And about the dumbo remark: some people are so out of their league it's better not to argue but rather taunt. That be you.
No buts? I wonder if that would hold up in any debate, court of law or any other regulated/moderated discussion forum

It would be very easy to win arguments if you could pick and choose which points are worthy of a rebuttal and which are not at your own discretion.
Elitist ****







