- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Posts
- 83,739
- Likes
- 44,750
- Location
- North Shore
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Hull City, Adelaide United, EH
I'm not across Leicester's financials from 14/15 or 15/16 so who knows how much profit they made. But I do think its financially risky re-signing players to long contracts on increased money on the basis of having increased revenues for the very first time from CL money.
Say Mahrez signs a new 5 year 100k a week deal (no clause because its just stupid). They then dont make the CL, he wants out and they arent able to pay him that sort of money without CL money, you get a situation where both player and club need to sell and the price wont be as high because of the desperation shown.
Say Mahrez signs a new 5 year 100k a week deal (no clause because its just stupid). They then dont make the CL, he wants out and they arent able to pay him that sort of money without CL money, you get a situation where both player and club need to sell and the price wont be as high because of the desperation shown.

