Supercoach DRAFT - Discussion thread

[Krujan]

I come in peace!

 

[toxic]

Not swallow
Not hill
Not pops kelly

Ps look thru all threads...some great discussions

 

[astro_toby]

Kinda surprised Swallow is getting so much love, even on the North board they appear to be lamenting his fall from grace?

 

[Kadog]

There's a thread for Draft Leagues or the Player X, Y or Z thread. But you would know that if you took a minute to look around before posting this shit thread you lazy campaigner.

LMFAO! Bam!

 

[hoddo]

There's a thread for Draft Leagues or the Player X, Y or Z thread. But you would know that if you took a minute to look around before posting this shit thread you lazy campaigner.

Yep, it was a bugger of a SC round. It will be a few more days yet before we all recover enough to get close to being patient with this kind of thread.

 

[stevebbb]

Brandon Ellis!
I got him in my draft team. Hoping he can improve a little from last year

 

[rocker_oz33]

They are monsters. I only stay because of the cheap chicken Parma on Wednesday's.

The Parma's are on Tuesday's ............tight ass Tuesday's.
See ya next Tuesday .

 

[Krujan]

Yep, it was a bugger of a SC round. It will be a few more days yet before we all recover enough to get close to being patient with this kind of thread.

 

[KardiniaPark]

The Parma's are on Tuesday's ............tight ass Tuesday's.
See ya next Tuesday .

Like I said, ****ing Monsters the lot of you.

 

[Flandersss]

Like I said, ******* Monsters the lot of you.

Its Parmi night ffs, snap out of it man!

 

[Krujan]

Gone 2-0 so far in 10 man cash league from pick 7, lovely.

Tried to get Adams (WB) this week in DEF, cmon waiver!

EDIT. Of course somebody else got him, FFS!

In regards to common waivers, if 2 coaches claim the same player under waiver, who gets him?

 

[karaoke]

In regards to common waivers, if 2 coaches claim the same player under waiver, who gets him?

The one who is higher on the waiver list, which is set by the draft order in reverse initially.

Then it is adjusted according to if that position on the waiver list is used.

For example, lets say 3 people/teams are trying to get in Barlow, who is now on the waiver list.

Teams 1, 6 & 8 have all proposed a trade for him - team 1 will get him, but then be immediately demoted to 12th on the waiver list for the next selection that comes up.

 

[toxic]

In regards to common waivers, if 2 coaches claim the same player under waiver, who gets him?

The one who is higher on the waiver list, which is set by the draft order in reverse initially.

Then it is adjusted according to if that position on the waiver list is used.

For example, lets say 3 people/teams are trying to get in Barlow, who is now on the waiver list.

Teams 1, 6 & 8 have all proposed a trade for him - team 1 will get him, but then be immediately demoted to 12th on the waiver list for the next selection that comes up.

Stealing Barlow is not an acceptable thing to do krk

 

[karaoke]

Stealing Barlow is not an acceptable thing to do krk

 

[astro_toby]

Basically I am trying to get a deal with another coach to land Hodge & McVeigh. I am making Picken, Ellis, Swallow, Ebert, I.Smith, S.Hill & J.Kelly available to make it happen.

What do you guys consider to be fair to do this? I offered Picken, Ebert & J.Kelly and he scoffed as if i was trying to bang his misses. Do you guys see that is accurate?

 

[Krujan]

The one who is higher on the waiver list, which is set by the draft order in reverse initially.

Then it is adjusted according to if that position on the waiver list is used.

For example, lets say 3 people/teams are trying to get in Barlow, who is now on the waiver list.

Teams 1, 6 & 8 have all proposed a trade for him - team 1 will get him, but then be immediately demoted to 12th on the waiver list for the next selection that comes up.

Thanks, I still not 100% sure. I claimed Waite first under waiver the other day, yet toxic got him. I was higher than him in the initial draft order, so your comment makes sense. So, I'm assuming that since he has used his on Waite, I'll be the one to get Barlow? ...or does some other campaigner still snatch him from under me?

I would have prefered 1st in best dressed, as in whoever claims the waivered player 1st gets the player, regardless of draft order or ladder positions.

 

[Krujan]

Stealing Barlow is not an acceptable thing to do krk

I traded in Barlow 1st, you stole Waite from me who I claimed 1st as well. This comp is rigged so that minnow teams like yours get 1st preference. I blame socialism!

 

[stevebbb]

I traded in Barlow 1st, you stole Waite from me who I claimed 1st as well. This comp is rigged so that minnow teams like yours get 1st preference. I blame socialism!

AND YOU STOLE SHERIDAN OFF ME LAST WEEK!

Enjoy his spudness

 

[Krujan]

AND YOU STOLE SHERIDAN OFF ME LAST WEEK!

Enjoy his spudness

I didn't "steal" him. He was a free agent when I traded him in. Not my fault that you're too slow.

 

[stevebbb]

I didn't "steal" him. He was a free agent when I traded him in. Not my fault that you're too slow.

I took him as free agent before you. Then all of a sudden you had him! RIGGED!

 

[Krujan]

I took him as free agent before you. Then all of a sudden you had him! RIGGED!

Um, no you didn't. Had you traded him in as a free agent first, the trade would have gone through right away and impossible for me to end up with him.

Edit: Unless I'm incorrect and traded him in under waiver, which probably didn't happen because I'm always right.

 

[karaoke]

Thanks, I still not 100% sure. I claimed Waite first under waiver the other day, yet toxic got him. I was higher than him in the initial draft order, so your comment makes sense. So, I'm assuming that since he has used his on Waite, I'll be the one to get Barlow? ...or does some other campaigner still snatch him from under me?

I would have prefered 1st in best dressed, as in whoever claims the waivered player 1st gets the player, regardless of draft order or ladder positions.

Some other campaigner can (& will), that's how the waiver list works.

Sorry, I got the bit on the waiver list wrong though in regards to it's order - it is set on 'reverse ladder' order which was the recommended one.

The lowest ranked team at the end of the round gets the first priority - and I assume from there it works it way up to eventually the highest rank.

So this will then be reset as we start into & complete rd3.

Free agents are a first in best dressed scenario.

 

[stevebbb]

Um, no you didn't. Had you traded him in as a free agent first, the trade would have gone through right away and impossible for me to end up with him.

Edit: Unless I'm incorrect and traded him in under waiver, which probably didn't happen because I'm always right.

All I know is that I traded him in my side as a free agent. He was actually in my side. I moved him from my bench to my field...

I checked later than night and you had him

No joke. I'm 100% sure. I wish I took a screenshot..

 

[Krujan]

Some other campaigner can (& will), that's how the waiver list works.

Sorry, I got the bit on the waiver list wrong though in regards to it's order - it is set on 'reverse ladder' order which was the recommended one.

The lowest ranked team at the end of the round gets the first priority - and I assume from there it works it way up to eventually the highest rank.

So this will then be reset as we start into & complete rd3.

Free agents are a first in best dressed scenario.

I ****in hate socialism so much!

 

[Krujan]

All I know is that I traded him in my side as a free agent. He was actually in my side. I moved him from my bench to my field...

I checked later than night and you had him

No joke. I'm 100% sure. I wish I took a screenshot..

That's bizarre. karaoke how did this happen?