Why not have Goodes as a 'super sub' this year and play Towers.
Goodes can cover pretty much any position and he can make an impact.
Goodes can cover pretty much any position and he can make an impact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah. The final minutes of a grand final have nothing to do with rotations.
Bird places well in B&F's because he is a very consistent and reliable role player who does exactly what he is asked to do by the coaching staff. He plays at his best most weeks, which is more than you can say for most players, but his best isn't as damaging as a number of other people on the list.
Cunningham finished 10th last year, FWIW.
I think Bird is good but you don't need to paint the lily.
Wash your mouth outWhy not have Goodes as a 'super sub' this year and play Towers.
Goodes can cover pretty much any position and he can make an impact.
I wasn't painting the lily, just picking it up after careless feet had stepped on it. Had Bird been fully fit in the last GF he wouldn't have been sub. He plays the role of a tagging midfielder who can hurt on the rebound. That's an experienced role and not one that's easily filled.
Cunningham had a good year in 2014 and deserved 10th, though his inexperience showed in the GF, as it did with most of the younger players. Does your FWIW imply that you think the judging is poor ? That's a big call.
If we were a rebuilding team out of contention for finals I'd say bring on the newbies, but we're not. Our premiership window is wide open and it's our experienced players who are holding it open.
Serious LOL at our Best and Fairest. I really hope nobody actually thinks it represents the best 10 players of the year.No, I'm saying that someone's B&F finish doesn't necessarily represent their overall value to the team. Was Cunningham out 10th most valuable player last year? I'd say almost certainly not. But he likely exceeded coaches' expectations/instructions.
I'm also not suggesting we replace Bird. Like I said, I think he's good and should be in the side at the moment. But I also feel he's got reasonable limitations, and he'd be one of the mids in the frame when making a decision about Heeney (I'd replace Lloyd first though. Cunningham & Rohan too, but I don't think they'd feature in that decision for the coaches).
Haha ...Wash your mouth out
Serious LOL at our Best and Fairest. I really hope nobody actually thinks it represents the best 10 players of the year.
Adam Goodes was 3 votes off winning the damn Brownlow in 2008, and didn't even place in our top 10.
See that's not an informed opinion. That's just disrespectful bitching again.Longmire gets to vote in the best and fairest so its the most accurate way to tell anything, he is the super coach after all
See that's not an informed opinion. That's just disrespectful bitching again.
There was a chase in the third quarter where he chased Whitfield from miles back, he chased for about 80 meters, didn't catch him but nearly got there, its the first time ive seen him chase in a while, surely that can only mean good signs that he is much more able than last year. We def cant have sides just running of him all game just so we can have a bit of x factor in the forward line.
Bird would wanna do better tagging jobs than he did on R Grey if he is to win the Carlie Bungee
Bit like Reid trying to go one on one with Cameron. The guy is too good for most experienced defenders. Better to concentrate on killing supply to these types of players.
I agree on your comments on Reid but I doubt Heeney would have the experience to go with a gun player (yet). Bird, despite some limitations, can restrict most players while also hurting them on attack. In AFL circles he's well rated as a tagger. Mind you, it could do Heeney good to run with some of the best.
B Smith grundy rampe
Hb laidler richards mcveigh
C hannebery parker cunningham
Hf mcglynn franklin rohan
F heeney tippett towers
Foll naismith, kennedy jack
Int bird Mitchell lloyd goodes jetta One to be dropped
Reid can come in for laidler when he can defend
Good team Sir Swans. I think McVeigh off HB instead of the midfield is critical, needs to happen.
Bit different team to mine but that again proves the depth at Sydney. Just wondering what in your opinion are the pros and cons of Naismith V Pyke? You seem to be in preference of Naismith.
Also with Towers, do you think he will become the Goodes replacement in the team?
Yep i not sold on jetta off half back and i ditched shaw, i am not sure on our depth but may as well try to develop some.
I think Pyke is cooked but i am the only one who thinks that so he is safe as houses, i am just tired of his slow plodding round the ground, i think he has lost speed and does not get the ball as much but more importantly his hit outs are limited, he just taps it to his feet every time
I think derricxk offers little more than a battering ram, not against seeing him again, but i went naismith on the basis that tippett in round 1 did a lot of ruck work, he is our best ruck so why not develop a kid, naismith looked lost in seniors but not bad in nab and is ahead of nankervis with selectors it seems. I did like what i saw of nankervis though so either or
Towers again i think i am the minority but he was solid round 1, he has a bit of height, speed and footy smarts, long way to go but could be a good fwd mid option in my view
Think swans are seriously regretting trading Mumford, should of let someone go to enusre they kept him. He is (and was) one of the premium rucks.
Naismith, i'm not sure he ready yet? Saw him vs Richmond last year, he was pretty bad.....but saying that I haven't seen much of him this year. Derricxk is not a starting ruckman (in a bad place if he is).
Towers needs to improve his kickign efficiency, everytime I see him he turns it over or misses the mark.