Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

They ditched Qatar too though. Eventually.Its good to see they've learned to walk after years crawling to Qatar for cash. But sure, if they're backing their position in like this then they've set their own standard.
Social media is how most people under 45 years of age share things with friends and family.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I mean did they ditch Qatar or did Qatar ditch them? That petrol dollar is hard to refuseThey ditched Qatar too though. Eventually.
They ditched Qatar too though. Eventually.
What do you mean?Everyone's Peter Tatchell when it comes to gay rights in Islamic countries, it's just so easy.
No one under the age 45 sets their social media to private.You can set all of those things to private as well.
Unless you want the attention.
Breaking news: bisexuality existsA married to a woman footballer seeking attention you mean
I have never been dumb enough to believe that corporations feel bad enough about anything to sacrifice their bottom line over it.But they always felt bad all the time they were accepting millions of dollars.
Like how they feel bad taking money from crypto and alcohol and gambling. So very bad.
No one under the age 45 sets their social media to private.
FFS, I stopped using social media entirely about 10 years ago because I got sick of people talking about their job, their car, or their breakfast.
That's literally what social media is about.
Talking about shit that's important to you, but no one else.
Just singling out the gays is a bit rough.
that is such a wild thing to say about homophobiaIf you don't want your private life commented on by strangers, then don't let strangers into your private life.
and more common than many think, especially with women & Gens y/z/aBreaking news: bisexuality exists
The extrajudicial nature of certain groups in our society is not a good thing. Would the "Rainbow Swans" group have been satisfied if Collard's original 9 week suspension was upheld?
Is that what it's about? The fact that the Saint's legal team dared to argue against the (effective) cancellation of a young player for calling another player a homophobic slur (which he denies), rather than agree to the original 9 week ban?
unless the evidence goes against there man...the saints need to stand by there man and support him.If the Saints genuinely believe Collard is innocent then they won't be apologising or changing their position. So I don't know how they and the Swans could find middle ground on this.
There shouldn't even be a pride game. It's rubbish and unnecessary and no one cares about it. People stopped caring about other people's sexuality years ago. People coming out as gay is not even a thing that garners attention anymore. Scrap it.
Lance Collard obviously cared
Am I reading this right?
The Saint's play an away game against Sydney, which Sydney name "Pride Game".
Now they play an away game against Sydney, which is now not called the "Pride Game".
That'll teach em
What exactly did St Kilda get for competing in this game, that they are not going to get now?
This is not newsworthy in any way and does anybody really care?