Remove this Banner Ad

Swans furious with St Kilda; kick saints out of pride game

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You can set all of those things to private as well.

Unless you want the attention.
No one under the age 45 sets their social media to private.

FFS, I stopped using social media entirely about 10 years ago because I got sick of people talking about their job, their car, or their breakfast.

That's literally what social media is about.

Talking about shit that's important to you, but no one else.

Just singling out the gays is a bit rough.
 
The extrajudicial nature of certain groups in our society is not a good thing. Would the "Rainbow Swans" group have been satisfied if Collard's original 9 week suspension was upheld?

Is that what it's about? The fact that the Saint's legal team dared to argue against the (effective) cancellation of a young player for calling another player a homophobic slur (which he denies), rather than agree to the original 9 week ban?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

But they always felt bad all the time they were accepting millions of dollars.

Like how they feel bad taking money from crypto and alcohol and gambling. So very bad.
I have never been dumb enough to believe that corporations feel bad enough about anything to sacrifice their bottom line over it.

If their customers crack the sh*ts enough to stop buying their product and it hurts their bottom line - they'll adjust.

If they go too far and/or societal views shift and it hurts their bottom line, they'll adjust again.
 
No one under the age 45 sets their social media to private.

That's an untruth right there.


FFS, I stopped using social media entirely about 10 years ago because I got sick of people talking about their job, their car, or their breakfast.

That's literally what social media is about.

Talking about shit that's important to you, but no one else.

Just singling out the gays is a bit rough.

Nobody is singling out just the gays, it is applicable to anyone who plasters their whole lives out there on social media for every Tom, Dick or Harry to see, then has a sook when people mock them.

If you don't want your private life commented on by strangers, then don't let strangers into your private life.
 
The extrajudicial nature of certain groups in our society is not a good thing. Would the "Rainbow Swans" group have been satisfied if Collard's original 9 week suspension was upheld?

Is that what it's about? The fact that the Saint's legal team dared to argue against the (effective) cancellation of a young player for calling another player a homophobic slur (which he denies), rather than agree to the original 9 week ban?

Calling it cancellation is a bit woke isn’t it.

He was being punished for breaking afl rules. No need to be dramatic.

The swans obviously regard the position St Kilda put forward as a disgrace. Which I don’t necessarily have a problem with.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If the Saints genuinely believe Collard is innocent then they won't be apologising or changing their position. So I don't know how they and the Swans could find middle ground on this.
unless the evidence goes against there man...the saints need to stand by there man and support him.
Big call by the swans.
 
Am I reading this right?
The Saint's play an away game against Sydney, which Sydney name "Pride Game".
Now they play an away game against Sydney, which is now not called the "Pride Game".
That'll teach em :rolleyes:

What exactly did St Kilda get for competing in this game, that they are not going to get now?

This is not newsworthy in any way and does anybody really care?
 
Lance Collard obviously cared

The point is, having a "pride" round is not going to change anyone's opinon who doesn't agree. It's a complete waste of time. Most people, in modern western countries like ours couldn't give a stuff about anyone's sexuality anymore and the few that don't agree will never agree. That battle was won years ago.

A "pride" match would be far more needed in Afghanistan before an Afghanistan Soccer League match rather than in a country like ours, but we all know that isn't going to happen and we all know why. It's easy to virtue signal to an already tolerant audience like us, than to do it somewhere where it's actually needed where you might get killed.
 
Am I reading this right?
The Saint's play an away game against Sydney, which Sydney name "Pride Game".
Now they play an away game against Sydney, which is now not called the "Pride Game".
That'll teach em :rolleyes:

What exactly did St Kilda get for competing in this game, that they are not going to get now?

This is not newsworthy in any way and does anybody really care?

The club will lose access to 1 of its 8 different jumpers that they can flog to supporters. That's about it.

Very brave of the Qatar Airways Swans.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom