Jesse White anyone? Score wasn't wiped then
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No head count takenJesse White anyone? Score wasn't wiped then
It does say though that unless specified otherwise it follows the AFL Laws of the Game, yes? Because I didn't find anything in the NEAFL by laws which referred to too many on the ground, but the AFL by laws certainly do.
Maybe now that he's headed down south Rhys Shaw can have a coffee with Gil on our behalf.You would think so, however hilariously it says:
“Where agreement is unable to be reached involving a question of interpretation of these Rules, the opinion of the AFL shall be accepted and acted upon and its decision will be final”
SF51 is incorrect...see law 5.1 NEAFL rulesIf the rulebook says that the points should be wiped for an infringement then we win by default. You can't change the rules on the spot because one finds them inconvenient. However SF51 might be on to something that there is no rule?
True but rules can't be changed based on a sentimental approach imo.Would of been a hollow way to win a GF anyways, Southport worthy winners.
Read above Mick. Anyways I suppose the decision has been made albeit dodgy af.True but rules can't be changed based on a sentimental approach imo.
True but rules can't be changed based on a sentimental approach imo.
Yes and the 'Laws of the Game' it refers to says there points should be wiped.
Didn’t prove there was a 19th playerJesse White anyone? Score wasn't wiped then
What are you having a go at me for?Yes and the 'Laws of the Game' it refers to says there points should be wiped.
I am not. I am just stating what it says in the book.What are you having a go at me for?
Does it really matter though? The NEAFL have decided it’s ok and the better team won.I am not. I am just stating what it says in the book.