Cactus_
Bluesky: @weirdmelbs.bsky.social
It is not really a matter of sympathy or not sympathy. Or what Stack deserves or doesn’t deserve. He’s done the wrong thing multiple times and doesn’t “deserve” much. Plus he almost certainly won’t play for us again. But I still don’t think it follows that the right thing to do is sack him.zero sympathy, because he already blew quarantine once. if anyone should have been all over the yays and nays of quarantine, it was him
he's shown contempt to everyone who agreed to give him a second chance. do we get a refund on the $100k and the list spot he will waste for us in 2021?
We should be lenient because:
- It shows we stand with our team mates even when they get themselves in trouble
- It shows we priorities player and employee welfare
- In these ways it enhances our reputation as a destination club
- It exposes us to less risk if Stack goes even-more-off-the-rails after he is no longer a Richmond player, if we can say that we went the extra mile for him
- It costs us very little in addition to what we’ve already invested in him to provide him welfare support through to the end of his contract.
Sacking him now (to use a very inappropriate metaphor) is basically slamming the door after the horse has bolted. All it would get us is a reputation for being hardball with our team mates when they’re in big strife, and how much is that really worth?





