And this is what the King F***wit had to say about it in his post match presser. So bitter,so deluded.
JAMES Hird dismissed Paddy Ryder's match-winning final term as 'lucky' but Port Adelaide coach Ken Hinkley believes the ruckman has plenty more heroics left in him.
Ryder kicked four goals – including three in the last quarter – to lift the Power to a 13-point win over Essendon in a high-scoring affair at Etihad Stadium.
But it wasn't enough to impress his former coach, with Hird claiming the ruckman's performance had little impact on the final result.
"I thought Ryder was held for three quarters; I thought he was lucky," Hird said after the game.
"He had four possessions at three-quarter time. So I didn't think (his impact was noteworthy) - no."
There can't be anyone left who believes *Albert now. His hubris is such that he thinks he can defend anything he does by lying and expecting everyone to believe him. It's now at the point where he doesn't realise that he has provided public proof of his willingness to lie in non-PED scandal scenarios, e.g.
1. When called out on his hypocrisy over the Sam Mitchell injecting incident, he tries to pass off the wearing of black below-elbow armbands by * in the 2001 GF, a dig at Brisbane's saline injecting at the time, as a tribute to Michael Long being injured the week before the game. Yeah, sure. I would suggest that there are at least 100 people who know first hand that he is lying, and half a million who suspect it.
2. Now this call that Ryder was lucky and had no impact. Everyone can see with their own eyes that this is wrong. It's not that he is a moron and got it wrong (having said that, he's nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is), it's him reacting to the implicit and fully justified criticism of his pig-headed decision to not play Giles whilst they get slaughtered in the ruck. So deny it.
For the remaining * and Sam Newman-like supporters who have stuck fast with the view that *Albert is a victim in the PED scandal as he is truthful and honourable, how can they ignore unrelated evidence of his lack of truthfulness and honour?