Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once the cat was out of the bag and it was clear that no rug was going to be big enough to hide this s**t, the AFL operated with the percieved intent of acting tough. This got * supporters off side (acceptable outcome for the AFL) but when it came to the crunch self interest prevailed with the tribunal decision. Sure, they needed to kill some sacrificial lambs along the way, but there was never any chance that they were going to do anything that had the potential to tarnish their reputation or damage their bottom line. Being signatories to WADA is the only thing that stopped this from going unpunished, otherwise this would have been put under a rug and stayed there.Yeah the AFL treated Essendon 'so badly'... Even though it was the AFL tribunal that initially decided not to hand out any suspensions which caused ASADA to bring the case to WADA. So... it wasn't the AFL that gave Essendon the heads up about the investigation and tried to, at every turn, minimise the damage the saga inevitably did the the AFL brand.
I don't understand the logic, why would the AFL purposefully target 34 players and an entire club unless the club had something to hide. There is no gain for the AFL to scapegoat a club just to prove a point about PED use, and throughout the entire saga, the AFL has been like that mate trying to get a junkie into rehab, with the junkie in a feverish paranoia blaming the AFL for attempting to make them accept their responsibility in the situation.
Case in point.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-01-10/james-hird-was-let-down-by-people-he-trusted-says-father
JAMES Hird's major health crisis that saw him taken to hospital came "out of the blue", his father Allan says.
And he said football officials were "thugs" and "bullies" without "a moral compass" for their treatment of his son in the aftermath of Essendon's supplement scandal.
The former Essendon coach was admitted to Cabrini Malvern Hospital last Wednesday.
Allan Hird approached Melbourne radio station 3AW to speak about his son in a recorded interview that was aired on Tuesday morning. He said James Hird was well.
"He's fine. My daughter's been keeping me regularly informed. I'm in Brisbane and I'm coming down shortly to see him.
"I had no inkling. It was just out of the blue, but anyway, that's where it is."
Hird said his son placed too much trust in the people around him during the saga that saw 34 Essendon players suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
"He put too much trust in the club doing the right thing, he put too much trust in the AFL, he put too much trust in our system of government," Hird said.
"I think if he had his time over again, he would have done it differently."
Hird called for a top-level inquiry to look into the supplements scandal, with the people who handled the matter - including former federal government ministers and AFL and Essendon officials - giving evidence under oath.
He accused administrators of conspiring to make Hird the scapegoat for the ill-fated supplement program, protesting his son's innocence.
"Get them to tell the truth. Get the truth out there and we'll see where it lies," he said.
"A 'conspiracy' is probably the wrong word in a legal sense, but in the general public's eye, I'd say a conspiracy between the Gillard government, the AFL and elements of the Essendon board, plus the Australian Anti-Doping Authority to get a result for something to get everyone out of a hole.
"The Gillard government had got itself into a hole ... overblew that crime commission report enormously and they needed something and they did that for political reasons.
"Both his employers were gunning for him but there was nothing specific he had ever done and there still isn't."
Hird was released from Cabrini on Thursday and is receiving treatment elsewhere.
His wife Tania on Friday issued a brief statement pleading for privacy.
"We wish to express our appreciation for the public support that has been given to James and our family since news of his hospitalisation became known," she said.
"At this time James and the Hird family are in need of privacy. We ask that this privacy be respected.
"We particularly ask this of the media contingent currently gathered at our house.
"James' health is our primary focus and concern."
Two points:
1. Thanks Dad for maintaining the "it was everyone else's fault but James's" line. Good one. I'm sure that helps. Funnily enough, if you step outside that narrative for a moment, this major health crisis doesn't come "out of the blue" at all. Woods for the trees and all that, I guess.
2. Any media contingent gathered anywhere within 10km's of Hird's house should **** right off, immediately. Their door stopping of the *Hird family throughout this saga has been totally wrong.
What a foamer.
The thing I continually don't understand with these bell ends is their angst towards the AFL. Apparently it's an AFL conspiracy to get at Essendon and Hird, yet the AFL warned Hird off pursuing peptides and then Vlad tried to tip them off. And the thanks that they got was Essendon then trying to hang them out to dry for it.
It makes less than zero sense. It's about as logical as "we don't know what the players were injected with but we are sure it wasn't banned."
Seriously, Hird Snr, take a look in the mirror, perhaps your treatment of James contributed to never wrong attitude.
Essendon could've made this whole thing go away had they put their hand up like Cronulla and copped their fair whack.
Cronulla took their whack and came out premiers shortly after. Something the Bongers wish could happen.
Third point - while most people are rightly calling for the media to back off, Hird Snr is more interested in another moment in the reflected sun so keeps it on the front page via major radio interview. And he's not the only Hird supporter to do it.Case in point.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-01-10/james-hird-was-let-down-by-people-he-trusted-says-father
JAMES Hird's major health crisis that saw him taken to hospital came "out of the blue", his father Allan says.
And he said football officials were "thugs" and "bullies" without "a moral compass" for their treatment of his son in the aftermath of Essendon's supplement scandal.
The former Essendon coach was admitted to Cabrini Malvern Hospital last Wednesday.
Allan Hird approached Melbourne radio station 3AW to speak about his son in a recorded interview that was aired on Tuesday morning. He said James Hird was well.
"He's fine. My daughter's been keeping me regularly informed. I'm in Brisbane and I'm coming down shortly to see him.
"I had no inkling. It was just out of the blue, but anyway, that's where it is."
Hird said his son placed too much trust in the people around him during the saga that saw 34 Essendon players suspended by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
"He put too much trust in the club doing the right thing, he put too much trust in the AFL, he put too much trust in our system of government," Hird said.
"I think if he had his time over again, he would have done it differently."
Hird called for a top-level inquiry to look into the supplements scandal, with the people who handled the matter - including former federal government ministers and AFL and Essendon officials - giving evidence under oath.
He accused administrators of conspiring to make Hird the scapegoat for the ill-fated supplement program, protesting his son's innocence.
"Get them to tell the truth. Get the truth out there and we'll see where it lies," he said.
"A 'conspiracy' is probably the wrong word in a legal sense, but in the general public's eye, I'd say a conspiracy between the Gillard government, the AFL and elements of the Essendon board, plus the Australian Anti-Doping Authority to get a result for something to get everyone out of a hole.
"The Gillard government had got itself into a hole ... overblew that crime commission report enormously and they needed something and they did that for political reasons.
"Both his employers were gunning for him but there was nothing specific he had ever done and there still isn't."
Hird was released from Cabrini on Thursday and is receiving treatment elsewhere.
His wife Tania on Friday issued a brief statement pleading for privacy.
"We wish to express our appreciation for the public support that has been given to James and our family since news of his hospitalisation became known," she said.
"At this time James and the Hird family are in need of privacy. We ask that this privacy be respected.
"We particularly ask this of the media contingent currently gathered at our house.
"James' health is our primary focus and concern."
Two points:
1. Thanks Dad for maintaining the "it was everyone else's fault but James's" line. Good one. I'm sure that helps. Funnily enough, if you step outside that narrative for a moment, this major health crisis doesn't come "out of the blue" at all. Woods for the trees and all that, I guess.
2. Any media contingent gathered anywhere within 10km's of Hird's house should **** right off, immediately. Their door stopping of the *Hird family throughout this saga has been totally wrong.
I wasn't aware of that battle, but considering * and Hird fought everyone everywhere and lost, it wouldn't surprise me that they also as tried to take on ASADA in building sandcastles.
If I was to give him any advice, I would suggest to him to have a good hard look at the calibre of people that he surrounded himself with during 2013-2016 (starting with his lawyer who ran all those crazy court cases for him, at great expense to *Hird and great financial gain to his law firm, and is still in the media pushing the "*Hird is a victim line) as none of them helped. None. All they did was pump him up, help develop his narrative as the poor poor "victim" heroically martyring himself for a righteous cause and of course, swallow the bullshit he and his media advisor (Hanke) put out as part of the stupid media games *Hird and the AFL played (everyone in the wrong for that crap) and fill his head full of the kind of hero-worhipped self-importance that would appear to have seen *Hird end up where he ended up. Talk about a circle jerk.
Third point - while most people are rightly calling for the media to back off, Hird Snr is more interested in another moment in the reflected sun so keeps it on the front page via major radio interview. And he's not the only Hird supporter to do it.
Pere?Hird pere is one messed up individual. My understanding is that he and James aren't on speaking terms but the old man comes out playing the protective Dad who will do anything for his boy a la Bryan and Ben Cousins (and that relationship seems to have deteriorated badly too)
Hird pere is so clearly lacking in even basic self awareness that he can say that he doesn't intend to offer a running commentary on this, but then proceeds to er, do exactly that.
I mean, his son has been hospitalised due to what appears to be a self-harm incident. I fail to see how engaging the national press to "go into bat" for him is helping the matter. James is a 43 year old man with a wife and children. Given the nature of the father/son relationship this latest effort from Hird pere is an excellent illustration of why the two are estranged.
Apparently old man hird is calling for some kind of "enquiry" into ASADA and he want evidence to be given under oath.
My mail is that there were definitely no Xmas bonuses at Asshurts this year. In fact, quite the opposite, there's been a not insignificant reduction in headcount.Great, thorough post but I believe the highlighted piece is incorrect. The lawyer assumed that *FC's insurance company would foot the bill for the extended court action on behalf of Hird but they refused and their position was upheld in another court when Hird sued them. The lawyer was apparently not the most popular bloke among his partners come Christmas bonus time.
Pere?
Great, thorough post but I believe the highlighted piece is incorrect. The lawyer assumed that *FC's insurance company would foot the bill for the extended court action on behalf of Hird but they refused and their position was upheld in another court when Hird sued them. The lawyer was apparently not the most popular bloke among his partners come Christmas bonus time.
My mail is that there were definitely no Xmas bonuses at Asshurts this year. In fact, quite the opposite, there's been a not insignificant reduction in headcount.
Seems that the great riches anticipated from theirtakeover bymerger with the Poms have not materialised. Rather than tapping some vast global profit pool, the Australian branch of the firm (which is quite profitable) is subsidising the UK business which has hit hard times.
So sad.
Of course he hired Dank to enhance performance through the use of drugs, I'm sure he was convinced at the time that it was legal. His failing came in trusting Dank's word that it was and not investigating it further himself.
Cheers guys for some of the articles you've showed me giving a different perspective on the CAS verdict. I pride myself on not getting caught up in one point of view and on adjusting my perspective when I become aware of more evidence, so thanks again for showing me another side of the discussion which maybe wasn't as prevalent in the news outlets I generally read, I'll certainly be reading some more and maybe adjusting the level of guilt I attribute to the players, particularly senior figures such as Watson, Fletcher etc.
...and this right here is the issue I was addressing.
Apparently old man hird is calling for some kind of "enquiry" into ASADA and he want evidence to be given under oath.
Does he not understand that this is a contract issue, not a criminal case. Although, I can't see why it would not be a criminal act for a club or its officials to deceive players by convincing them that the supliments they took were legit when in fact they were not, so maybe in a kind of reverse logic manner, old man hird has a point.