Tarrant Or Cloke

tara

Senior List
Joined
Sep 2, 2004
Posts
261
Likes
2
AFL Club
Carlton
Thread starter #1
Quick question to finish an argument.

My Irish mate swears blind and willing to bet his life on the fact that Tarrant was suspended for the GF a couple of years ago.

He wont accept that it was Cloke.

Would someone please sort this out for us?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

tara

Senior List
Joined
Sep 2, 2004
Posts
261
Likes
2
AFL Club
Carlton
Thread starter #8
Nope Irish hasnt paid the ultimate sacrifce yet. He realises he meant Rocca now when he originally bought up the topic.

Wookie I hope Baz doesnt get rubbed out but the AFL/VFL has a history of rubbing blokes out for nothing prior to the big day.

I dont remember the Rocca incident but I always thought Cloke was unfairly treated as his objective was the contest not the bloke.

The rule makers are turning the game into a non contact sport :mad:
 

BarraKouta

Senior List
Suspended
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Posts
263
Likes
0
Location
Lexus Centre
Other Teams
Collingwood
#10
Tarrant was screwed out of 2 goals, there is no way that first one was touched, that call cost us the Grand Final, Chris is very much a confidence player, if that goal had been correctly called a goal I believe he would have kicked 4 or 5 and we would have won. Of course we still might have won if they paid free kicks for rape by full backs
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Top Bottom