Tarrant Or Cloke

[tara]

Quick question to finish an argument.

My Irish mate swears blind and willing to bet his life on the fact that Tarrant was suspended for the GF a couple of years ago.

He wont accept that it was Cloke.

Would someone please sort this out for us?

 

[wookie]

it was jason cloke mate

 

[tara]

Thanks Wookie.

 

[Murray]

Cloke in 02
Rocca in 03

 

[wookie]

so on the topic, do you think hall will go this week?

 

[dumesny1]

Has your mate paid the ultimate sacrifice yet for being wrong?

 

[you idiot sheehan]

Go and tell him he's Irish. Although, he may as well have been rubbed out in '02. Oh Tarrant, if you'd just kicked that goal in the third quarter.

 

[tara]

Nope Irish hasnt paid the ultimate sacrifce yet. He realises he meant Rocca now when he originally bought up the topic.

Wookie I hope Baz doesnt get rubbed out but the AFL/VFL has a history of rubbing blokes out for nothing prior to the big day.

I dont remember the Rocca incident but I always thought Cloke was unfairly treated as his objective was the contest not the bloke.

The rule makers are turning the game into a non contact sport

 

[DidaksLeftFoot]

Well they both cost us the flag; Cloke for his reckless spoil attempt, Tarrant for his reckless goal-kicking...

 

[BarraKouta]

Tarrant was screwed out of 2 goals, there is no way that first one was touched, that call cost us the Grand Final, Chris is very much a confidence player, if that goal had been correctly called a goal I believe he would have kicked 4 or 5 and we would have won. Of course we still might have won if they paid free kicks for rape by full backs

 

[PieLebo87]

i want 2 cry