- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Posts
- 763
- Reaction score
- 264
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Avalanche
Rix is big, strong, fit, aggressive, determined, is a good mark and is bloody fast. He offers versatility (Ruck, tall tagger, defender or decoy forward). He doesn't have the best footy brain or footskills but he is a lot better than many ruckmen getting a game (Jamar, Richards, Knobel, Ackland, Taylor, Doyle, Laycock, etc).
The reason that he wasn't drafted until he was 24 years old is because he had a very late growth spurt. When on Hawthorn's rookie list (2003?), he was 194cm and too short to ruck. He then grew 4-5 cms and got his chance.
If Rix gets a game ahead of Brooks it won't be because of size, because are they both 198cms and around 97kgs.
To me it sounds like there's a little bit of Small-Man's Syndrome (No offence intented) kicking in with your comments on Rixy.
Exactly what i intended to say. I cant stand a bloke getting a game just because he is big. And thats at junior and senior level of local football. At the elite, a player must have skill and footy smarts and in turn i think you answered my exact arguement.
Thats whats ruining the game at the moment. The athlete being overtaken by the footballer. I was trying to suggest (and i think it involentary showed in your post) that Rix may have the height, muscle, fitness and speed that are second to none but lacks good footy brain and skills. Which is why is believe he is an avenue that will eventually come to a dead end. He is 24/25 therefore the game is way past the point of trying to teach him now.
Its quite funny how we can accept a good athlete but neglect the most important aspects of the game. Which is playing it. Its like the NHL getting figure skaters to play professional hockey.
But i understand he has great attributes, but lets be realistic, if the bloke cant read the game or kick a drop punt at 24/25 well, he's not going to learn overnight.






