Team setup alterations - Interested for input

What should we do with our team line-ups?

  • Extra OM and one less FWD

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

I love those numbers. I also don't mind the 9 40+ BMs (D*.75)] being a touch less top end than others because the position is less of a punt anyway, IMO, going a BM than an IM or OM because you're guaranteed points for their disposals, rather than hoping for them to be specifically contested or not. This means there could be a nice balance of LFFL coaches using it as their Captain choice. I'm all in for that possy.

I like all that there. I'm all in this year.

Yeah the BM is similar to the existing back position. Even average ones will still go alright even if they don't get many clearances.

I'm happy with the *.75 and the change to backs and forwards then the *2 CP change to IMs. Once I hear some more thoughts from people I'll confirm and post the carryover player thread.
 
I'm happy enough with this scoring:

Back: (D + R*4)
Back: (D + R*4)
Fwd: (D/2 + M*3 + G*6 + B)
Fwd: (D/2 + M*3 + G*6 + B)
CC:
IM: (CP*2 + CL*3)
OM: (UP*1.5 + CL*3)
BM: (D*0.75 + CL*3)
R: (HO + M*3)
T: (T*5)
U: (D + M*3 + R*4 + CL*3 + HO + T*5 + G*6 + B)
WAG just hoping to get a final word if anyone has any issues/concerns otherwise go with this.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'm happy enough with this scoring:

Back: (D + R*4)
Back: (D + R*4)
Fwd: (D/2 + M*3 + G*6 + B)
Fwd: (D/2 + M*3 + G*6 + B)
CC:
IM: (CP*2 + CL*3)
OM: (UP*1.5 + CL*3)
BM: (D*0.75 + CL*3)
R: (HO + M*3)
T: (T*5)
U: (D + M*3 + R*4 + CL*3 + HO + T*5 + G*6 + B)
Is this confirmed as the final scoring?
 
Has everyone been using this system?

Back: (D + R*4)
Back: (D + R*4)
Fwd: (D/2 + M*3 + G*6 + B)
Fwd: (D/2 + M*3 + G*6 + B)
CC:
IM: (CP*2 + CL*3)
OM: (UP*1.5 + CL*3)
BM: (D*0.75 + CL*3)
R: (HO + M*3)
T: (T*5)
U: (D + M*3 + R*4 + CL*3 + HO + T*5 + G*6 + B)

Because looking at scores, total team scores are about 20-25 PPG higher than they are when I put the scores into Excel... I mean, it could be my monkeys but when I double checked a few of them, they were what they were supposed to be...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

E7sMXcc.png


That's what I had, as I said just looking at the scores last round, the general theme was scores were about 20-25PPG higher than what i had when putting it in the Excel spreadsheet. I double checked a few names and my scores were correct. It didn't change results, especially not for my game with WAG who is probably lucky I've been AWOL considering the hammering I gave him in Round 3. Nonetheless, there were some close games in that round, so happy to check it some more, but think most of the results were the same, just scores different.
 
Not sure if you've had an error somewhere or I have but based off scores posted last round I won?
Can you post the player scores for each team? I'll compare and see where the error is.

I had it as a two-point win to the Polar Bears, so every point counts.
 
Can you post the player scores for each team? I'll compare and see where the error is.

I had it as a two-point win to the Polar Bears, so every point counts.

Bears

B: Michael Hibberd 64
B: Nathan Wilson 31
CC: Shannon Hurn (B) (vc) 43
F: Jake Stringer 40.5
F: Lachie Hunter 36.5
BM: Dayne Beams 27.75
IM: Luke Parker (c) 32x2=64
OM: Steele Sidebottom 37.5
R: Nick Vlastuin 9
T: Jack Graham 25
U: Dustin Martin 84

Polar Bears

Back- Rory Laird C 42 x 2 - 84
Back- Jeremy Finlayson - 31
Fwd- Taylor Walker 28.5
Fwd- Robbie Gray 38.5
OM- David Zaharakis 37.5
IM- Ollie Wines VC - 36
BM- Scott Pendlebury - 30.75
Ruck- Matthew Leuenberger - 23
Tackler- Jack Redden - 20
CC- Jarryd Lyons (IM) - 27
Utility- Brodie Grundy - 104

*Note: I've literally copied this out of the round 3 page so it could be wrong?
 
Back
Top