- Thread starter
- #51
If they're indeed planning to play Hurley back, ok cool whatever. if they're expecting hardingham or w/ever to play on tarrant or w/ever tho...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
as per usual I'll say Ryder rucks the game so Bellchambers is the unlucky man. But we are paying Ryder 400K-500K (well not now, from next season) so it's kinda important we get the best out of him (or you could ship him off i guess)
But I guess with, here's hoping, no big KPP holes, Ryder could actually play that free roaming role that has so often been dreamt about and he might even be good at it, which could solve a problem or two.
Surprising, but very interesting. I think it could (could) be a good move, but it could backfire horribly.
Howlett --> Lee
Pears --> Fletcher
Slattery --> NLM (sub) --> Browne (mid) --> Hibberd (back)
Hooker --> Hurley (back) --> Crameri (forward)
Winderlich --> Monfries
I think we structured up pretty well last week, so it looks like they're going for a similar thing.
Certainly hope it isn't Crameri that would miss, seems the most obvious though.
Agreed I wasn't a fan when we only had Hurley resting ruckman and Crameri I reckon it throws our structure out IMO it would have been great to have gumby Hurley and cram up forward and tried to make them man up, instead I can see them just double team gumby and cram if hurley does go back and us just kicking high balls to davey and jetta. So i really dont understand this unless of course hooker and pears are injuried and if Hurley does start forward hopefully! I'd go hardingham to tarrent as he is the weakest link.Don't like it. We'll be exposed down back. Nor will we be able to expose their midget backline.