Remove this Banner Ad

Teams distribution

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

ToroHombre

Club Legend
Jul 15, 2007
1,403
8
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Green Bay Packers
I looked through my team and I noticed that I have players represented from 15 of the 16 AFL teams. Usually in the past there have been 2 or 3 clubs I have not included.

I have:
Adel - 1
Bris - 2
Carl - 3
Coll - 1
Ess - 1
Freo - 4
Geel - 2
Haw - 1
Melb - 0
Kang - 2
Port - 1
Rich - 5
StK - 1
Syd - 1
WC - 2
WB - 2
 
Adelaide - 1
Brisbane - 2
Carlton - 2
Collingwood - 0
Essendon - 5
Fremantle - 4
Geelong - 1
Hawthorn - 0
Melbourne - 0
North Melbourne - 3
Port Adelaide - 2
Richmond - 1
Sydney - 3
St Kilda - 3
West Coast - 3
Western Bulldogs - 0
 
Up until last night I was only missing a Roos player. Now I swapped Ziebell for Sidebottom and am only missing a Magpie.

Adelaide - 1
Brisbane - 2
Carlton - 3
Collingwood - 0
Essendon - 1
Fremantle - 4
Geelong - 2
Hawthorn - 2
Melbourne - 2
North - 1
P.A. - 2
Richmond - 2
StK - 1
Syd - 3
WC - 2
W.B. - 1
 
Ben the gooner/adamania - you both have 5 players from your own team. Sure this can be ok, but perhaps just reassess a little to make sure you arnt being biased.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Adelaide - 1
Bris - 4
Carl - 2
Coll - 0
Ess - 2+2 reserves
Freo - 3+3 reserves
Gee - 1
Haw - 1
Melb - 0
NM - 2
Port - 1
Rich - 1
Stk - 1
Syd - 1+1 reserve
Wce - 1+1 reserve
WB - 1+1 reserve
 
Ben the gooner/adamania - you both have 5 players from your own team. Sure this can be ok, but perhaps just reassess a little to make sure you arnt being biased.
Was gonna say that myself.
Still mixing up my team, but I know that the most players I have from 1 team is Collingwood. Atm I have 3, but I might get Shaw which makes it 4.. :eek:
 
Bombers own has good idea - list players in 22, then reserves. Its ok to have 4-5 from one team, especially if they are reserves too (hill, suban, ballantyne for example), but i would be a bit worried if i was say a sydney supporter and i had mcveigh, ryan okeefe, vespremi, jolly, mattner all in my team, or even worse, a bombers supporter with lucas, gumby, davey all in the same 22 (just as an example).
 
1 is a player I expect to improve on last year due to a better structure.
1 is a player I expect to have a breakout year
1 is a gun returning from injury
1 is a rookie priced player guaranteed a game
1 is a <200k player who will score well, and is guaranteed a game

The first two are judgement calls coming from knowing my club intimately - I'd expect you could give me 2 in the same category from Sydney.

The last three are players everyone should be at least considering.
 
1 is a player I expect to improve on last year due to a better structure.
1 is a player I expect to have a breakout year
1 is a gun returning from injury
1 is a rookie priced player guaranteed a game
1 is a <200k player who will score well, and is guaranteed a game
Mcphee
Houli?
Lucas
Gumbleton
Skipworth
 
From watching essendon v dogs, i actually think grant is a better selection than gumbleton. For me, grant almost always gave a contest, and worked hard, and generally looked more dangerous (though his kicking was shocking). There were a couple of times, where grant would be 10m away from the contest then sprint to put the spoil on or at least contest, then 5mins later gumbleton would be in the same position but wouldnt be able to do the same thing. Just something i picked up that to me shows grant to be little more advanced at this stage.
 
Ben the gooner/adamania - you both have 5 players from your own team. Sure this can be ok, but perhaps just reassess a little to make sure you arnt being biased.
My Richmond players are:
- A cheap player who had a good start to the NAB cup
- A guy who had a great finish to 2008
- A young, cheap player who looks to be a good prospect
- A young, developing tall
- A talented player with dual eligibility.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Ben the gooner/adamania - you both have 5 players from your own team. Sure this can be ok, but perhaps just reassess a little to make sure you arnt being biased.

I think its also to do with job security, the bombers are rebuilding and keen to get games into their youngsters, the Dogs are more reluctant to thrown Grant to the wolves.
 
My Richmond players are:
- A cheap player who had a good start to the NAB cup
- A guy who had a great finish to 2008
- A young, cheap player who looks to be a good prospect
- A young, developing tall
- A talented player with dual eligibility.
Raines
Tuck
Jackson?
Riewoldt
Deledio
 
Adelaide - 2
Brisbane - 2
Carlton - 4
Collingwood - 1
Essendon - 1
Fremantle - 4
Geelong - 1
Hawthorn - 0
Melbourne - 2
North Melbourne - 2
Port Adelaide - 1
Richmond - 3
St Kilda - 1
Sydney - 2
West Coast - 2
Western Bulldogs - 2

Dont have any Hawks in the team at the moment.
 
Currently looks like this, but likely to change before Rnd 1

Adelaide - 1
Brisbane - 1
Carlton - 2
Collingwood - 4
Essendon - 2
Fremantle - 5
Geelong - 2
Hawthorn - 0
Melbourne - 2
North Melbourne - 2
Port Adelaide - 2
Richmond - 2
St Kilda - 2
Sydney - 1
West Coast - 1
Western Bulldogs - 1

Pies and Freo higher due to bench players
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Adelaide - 4
Brisbane - 3
Carlton - 2
Collingwood - 0
Essendon - 2
Fremantle - 2
Geelong - 5 :)
Hawthorn - 0
Melbourne - 0
North - 2
Port - 1
Richmond - 3
St Kilda - 2
Sydney - 1
West Coast - 2
Bulldogs - 1
 
Adel - 0 +1 rookie
Bris - 1
Carl - 2
Coll - 1 +1 rookie
Ess - 1
Freo - 2 +1 rookie
Geel - 5 +1 rookie
Haw - 0
Melb - 0
Kang - 2
Port - 1 +1 rookie
Rich - 1
StK - 3
Syd - 0 +2 rookie
WC - 1
WB - 2 +1 rookie

Does having 6 geelong players make me biased? and with no hawthorn players......bitter?
 
Adelaide - 0
Brisbane - 1
Carlton - 2
Collingwood - 3
Essendon - 2
Fremantle - 5
Geelong - 1 woooo
Hawthorn - 0
Melbourne - 0
North Melbourne - 3
Port Adelaide - 1
Richmond - 4
St Kilda - 2
Sydney - 3
West Coast - 2
Western Bulldogs - 1
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Teams distribution

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top