Most likely this has been discussed before, but am interested in people's thoughts.
Personally, i like the current drama thats afforded by players deciding when and when not to review. I know there have been calls for this to be taken out of the players hands and the 3rd umpire to adjudicate without this being requested, whether from players or on field umpires
Ideally i would have no review system but we've come too far to revert back to this. I've always gotten some kind of sick pleasure from watching incompetent decisions from umpires (See Bucknor non decision against Symonds vs India, Billy Bowden non decision vs Simon Jones in 05 ashes).
Opinions? Do you want to see the third umpire be given this much power and what would be the repercussions or benefits to the game were this to happen?
Personally, i like the current drama thats afforded by players deciding when and when not to review. I know there have been calls for this to be taken out of the players hands and the 3rd umpire to adjudicate without this being requested, whether from players or on field umpires
Ideally i would have no review system but we've come too far to revert back to this. I've always gotten some kind of sick pleasure from watching incompetent decisions from umpires (See Bucknor non decision against Symonds vs India, Billy Bowden non decision vs Simon Jones in 05 ashes).
Opinions? Do you want to see the third umpire be given this much power and what would be the repercussions or benefits to the game were this to happen?