Mega Thread The 2017 'Buckley's Chances' Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThePheonix

Senior List
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
160
Likes
92
Location
Chiang Mai
AFL Club
Collingwood
One thing that's been consistent in these discussions all along is that for most, if not all, of the reasons people put out their in favour of sacking Bucks, there's always several responses (often rooted in truth) about how "criticism X isn't Buck's fault, it's actually excuses 1, 2, and 3 that explain that".

Bucks has been probably the most unluckiest of coaches that I can remember, but all that means is that it's possible to come up with reasons why we shouldn't sack him, rather than the flip side, which is to come up with good coaching merit based reasons for keeping him. All these (perfectly valid) excuses do, is mask his actual coaching ability. After 6 years, we still haven't seen anything that demonstrates that he's a capable coach that deserves reappointment - only reasons that show how unfair it'd be to sack him.

Given our declining results each year, the decision on whether to keep/fire him based on thus far obscured coaching merit, is therefore a massive gamble. It could pay off or fall apart in extreme equal measures. Or it could be more of the same.
Great coaches overcome any disadvantages or misfortunes that arise, it is the reason why they are great. If it was easy and experience no misfortunes then anyone will be able to coach.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

PhiloBeddoe

Premium Gold
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Posts
4,848
Likes
5,101
Location
Ma's house.
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
None
One thing that's been consistent in these discussions all along is that for most, if not all, of the reasons people put out their in favour of sacking Bucks, there's always several responses (often rooted in truth) about how "criticism X isn't Buck's fault, it's actually excuses 1, 2, and 3 that explain that".

Bucks has been probably the most unluckiest of coaches that I can remember, but all that means is that it's possible to come up with reasons why we shouldn't sack him, rather than the flip side, which is to come up with good coaching merit based reasons for keeping him. All these (perfectly valid) excuses do, is mask his actual coaching ability. After 6 years, we still haven't seen anything that demonstrates that he's a capable coach that deserves reappointment - only reasons that show how unfair it'd be to sack him.

Given our declining results each year, the decision on whether to keep/fire him based on thus far obscured coaching merit, is therefore a massive gamble. It could pay off or fall apart in extreme equal measures. Or it could be more of the same.
1,2 and 3 are only excuses when you absolve Buckley of any responsibility for the state of the list and performances. Many of the points here are explanations.
 

jackcass

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Posts
15,791
Likes
13,355
Location
Bendigo
AFL Club
Collingwood
Great coaches overcome any disadvantages or misfortunes that arise, it is the reason why they are great. If it was easy and experience no misfortunes then anyone will be able to coach.
Yeah, like Barassi at Melbourne and Sydney, Hafey at Collingwood, Sydney and Geelong, Sheedy at GWS, Blight at Geelong and StKilda, MM at Carlton...
 

jackcass

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Posts
15,791
Likes
13,355
Location
Bendigo
AFL Club
Collingwood
1,2 and 3 are only excuses when you absolve Buckley of any responsibility for the state of the list and performances. Many of the points here are explanations.
I agree with you, the arguments put are usually valid explanations, not excuses. However I don't see that they absolve Bucks, merely provide mitigation.
 

PhiloBeddoe

Premium Gold
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Posts
4,848
Likes
5,101
Location
Ma's house.
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
None
I agree with you, the arguments put are usually valid explanations, not excuses. However I don't see that they absolve Bucks, merely provide mitigation.
Some believe that a poster's motivation for mentioning injuries etc would be to absolve Buckley, hence they call them excuses.
Same for his press conferences when they label his explanations as excuses e.g. Can't wait for the Buckley's excuses after the game.' Granted he has come up with a couple but on the whole, he explains why we lost.
 

Help My Club

All Australian
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Posts
751
Likes
411
AFL Club
Collingwood
Some believe that a poster's motivation for mentioning injuries etc would be to absolve Buckley, hence they call them excuses.
Same for his press conferences when they label his explanations as excuses e.g. Can't wait for the Buckley's excuses after the game.' Granted he has come up with a couple but on the whole, he explains why we lost.
"he explains why we lost"

Indeed. And he has that down to a fine art.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Posts
1,150
Likes
1,059
Location
Elwood
AFL Club
Collingwood
Disagree, think we've had very clear understanding of what we've needed.
The club might have had a clear understanding of what we needed, but we can only judge the results of that and the consensus of most of the list experts is that we have an over abundance of defensive mids and a shortage of KPP's.
 

jadami1973

Team Captain
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Posts
368
Likes
162
AFL Club
Collingwood
Stated facts are fine but they are only a starting point. To analyse each one would turn this into a typical TLDNR post.
I'll work with a couple.
All teams do have injuries but they will differ in terms of position, experience and how important they are in terms of on ground leadership and effect on other positions. Comparing injury lists is futile because very few will go into detailed analysis of how each team suffers in its own way when it comes to injuries. Many of the commentators /experts won't go into it because it seems like a taboo thing to do and takes too much effort. It's also a time thing because they only have a short time to go into the details of each team.

Some sides have the luxury of replacing one soldier with another, others don't. To throw a blanket over the whole lot and blurt out the line "injury is no excuse", is stuff from another era that even the professionals won't let go of.
Injury depleted sides may win a few games against more fancied opponents but most of the time, that level performance is unsustained. If it ends up being a knock on list management, so be it.

As for your fact that the rebuild was forced and not required, whether it was required is based on opinion so it's not a fact.
Really you think when Buckley took over we needed a rebuild rather that a few minor tweaks to allow for form and retirements ? That is all Chris Scott did with Geelong and won them another flag.
To me a rebuild is re-working your list because it was deemed not good enough. That clearly wasn't the case. It is a fact we only lost 3 games in 2011.
 

CFC2010

Premium Gold
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Posts
17,240
Likes
29,807
AFL Club
Collingwood
Really you think when Buckley took over we needed a rebuild rather that a few minor tweaks to allow for form and retirements ? That is all Chris Scott did with Geelong and won them another flag.
To me a rebuild is re-working your list because it was deemed not good enough. That clearly wasn't the case. It is a fact we only lost 3 games in 2011.
Do you think it was Buckley's decision to "tweak" the team or the whole Clubs?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

jadami1973

Team Captain
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Posts
368
Likes
162
AFL Club
Collingwood
Judge him on his coaching.........the rebuild as you put it is on our Club as a whole.

Especially our drug crusader.
it's simple we need change to happen we are mediocre. We lack direction and have done for several years. Buckley is the head coach so much of the responsibility lies with him.
 

CFC2010

Premium Gold
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Posts
17,240
Likes
29,807
AFL Club
Collingwood
it's simple we need change to happen we are mediocre. We lack direction and have done for several years. Buckley is the head coach so much of the responsibility lies with him.
You are right the buck stops with Bucks (pun intended) but IMO I don't think the change you and most people want will happen this year.

Just my two cents
 

PhiloBeddoe

Premium Gold
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Posts
4,848
Likes
5,101
Location
Ma's house.
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
None
Really you think when Buckley took over we needed a rebuild rather that a few minor tweaks to allow for form and retirements ? That is all Chris Scott did with Geelong and won them another flag.
To me a rebuild is re-working your list because it was deemed not good enough. That clearly wasn't the case. It is a fact we only lost 3 games in 2011.
Doesn't matter what my particular opinion is but according to club at the end of 2012, the current list wasn't going to win them the next flag so they started making moves. There's two differing opinions, your and theirs. The only fact there is that the club made a decision. How many changes were made to the 2011 list in the off season?
Scott won a flag in his first year so not a lot of opportunity to make massive list changes.
Of those who were 'culled', who needed to stay?
 
Last edited:

Carringbush2010

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Posts
4,474
Likes
2,474
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Pines Football Club
I reckon it would be the pinnacle for an AFL coach....just like a driver, getting the Ferrari gig in F1 :)
Leon Cameron has the gig at gws - sorry got confused he has the mercedes team.

Don't reckon we're the fez though, more like the williams or force india
 

Carringbush2010

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Posts
4,474
Likes
2,474
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Pines Football Club
Disagree, think we've had very clear understanding of what we've needed.
Understanding yes but planning no, sure the well was dry last year but IMO we would've been better keeping the warchest instead of wells and mayne. Those 2 look like a mistake that the club won't admit
 

Carringbush2010

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Posts
4,474
Likes
2,474
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Pines Football Club
What he said on Footy Classified was that whether he stays or goes is not solely a decision for the club. He said if he felt he wasn't doing the job well and getting the best out of the players, regardless of what the club wanted, he also had a decision to make about whether he would want to continue as coach.
In your opinion is that an admission that he might walk at years end should things stay awry? I watched that episode too and in my opinion it is ultimately the clubs decision to make; he may have an opportunity to "convince" the board 1 way or the other but it should rest with the club and not the coach and I think he'll find that out sooner or later
 

Carringbush2010

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Posts
4,474
Likes
2,474
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Pines Football Club
Yeah, like Barassi at Melbourne and Sydney, Hafey at Collingwood, Sydney and Geelong, Sheedy at GWS, Blight at Geelong and StKilda, MM at Carlton...
Apart from mm you could argue the rest are certainly not worse, Blight at geelong and Hafey with us had better seasons
 

Jafo

All Australian
Joined
Oct 12, 2016
Posts
967
Likes
615
AFL Club
Collingwood
I'd like Eade back. In his first two years with us, he was the Director of Coaching (before the role was abolished) and mentoring Bucks. Coincidence that we made the finals in those two years? Probably, as I know most attribute that to the lingering influence of MM and the fact that we still had most of our premiership players.

Then Eade joined the merry-go-round of heads of our football department following Walsh's departure.

What position would he take up?
And your opinion of Balme? Was good at Geelong, didn't go too bad last time with us and stellar revival at Richmond so far.

Not sold on return of Rocket based on track record at Swans, Dogs and now Suns. I hear a lot of Dogs supporters having not much confidence in Rocket gelling a playing group together very well. Much like how we are talking about Bucks as our senior coach.

Wouldn't mind Harley either.
 

Farktherest

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Posts
11,141
Likes
17,157
AFL Club
Carlton
Really you think when Buckley took over we needed a rebuild rather that a few minor tweaks to allow for form and retirements ? That is all Chris Scott did with Geelong and won them another flag.
To me a rebuild is re-working your list because it was deemed not good enough. That clearly wasn't the case. It is a fact we only lost 3 games in 2011.
This...not sure how anyone could disagree.

Iirc Collingwood were a very young team at the time and there was talk of a dynasty with prolonged success.

You were successful at a good time with the expansion clubs coming in and FA started a few years later...it's well documented hawthorn took advantage of being successful at this time to stay at the top. Geelong are also doing it they've been in contention for years.

Could have followed their path of just tweaking the list etc instead of a full overhaul.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom