The 6/6/6 Rule - does it help or hinder us

[Triple Baileys]

This rule change could really expose Trengove.

He is a better ruck than you are rating him. He'll be ok. The issue is going to be whether we take advantage, stymie and shark enough. We'll see.

 

[Triple Baileys]

If you don't want Gil getting "any more ideas", take away his right to visas to the US, and sabotage all his pay TV options. That way he might only get input from our own game, rather than all his 'inspirations' coming from the good old US of A.

He is inspired by anyone who will give him an all expenses paid overseas trip.

 

[Triple Baileys]

He is inspired by anyone who will give him an all expenses paid overseas trip.

Basically, he is a crook, like the politicians we keep voting for.

 

[Cudi]

Saw this graphic on Instagram

 

[cecil]

I think it really depends on the team we put out, and how experienced it is.

Wood and Morris are both very very good 1 on 1, so if they play most games then you'd think our defence should hold steady when it is 6 on 6 down there. I'm a big fan of Crozier too, and I only really see JJ as possibly being caught out from our "best" back 6 (Naughton and Cordy being the other two spots). I'm not huge on Daniel down back and this could affect him the most.

Up forward if we can get lots of games out of Dickson and Gowers then they could be advantaged by the rule because they are both good 1-on-1. It makes it easier for Schache too, which could help him that extra 10% he needs to transition to being a best 22 lock tall forward.